Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Titre | Description | Organization |
Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Letter to Secretary Salazar on the need for improving measures to screen for invasive species imports |
A letter to Secretary Ken Salazar of the U.S. Department of the Interior expressing the need for improved legislation to screen animal and plant imports on their risk to the environment. |
National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species | Jan 26 2011 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Resolution Against Radioactive Waste Metal and Materials Dispersal Into Consumer Products |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United: |
Great Lakes United | Dec 22 2010 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution in Opposition of Movement of Hazardous Cargo on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes setting the precedent of shipping radioactive waste metals and materials on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United firmly opposes the shipping of any hazardous material in ice conditions; THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United strongly recommends that the following conditions be met as it pertains to the movement of hazardous cargo on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River: |
Great Lakes United | Dec 22 2010 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution in Support of the Promotion of Green Infrastructure Policies and Practices |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United urge the provincial and state governments of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region to give integrated watershed planning legal standing in water management instruments, including the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statement, the Water Resources Act, Clean Water Act, and Conservation Authorities Act; THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United urge the state and provincial governments of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region to quantify the economic, social, environmental, and health benefits of green infrastructure, and that such accounting be inclusive of any savings realized from the extended life of existing grey infrastructure; THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United urge municipalities and the state and provincial governments of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region to set ambitious, achievable performance measures and targets to ensure sustainable water resources on a watershed and aquifer basis; such targets will take into consideration human, economic, and ecosystem needs; |
Great Lakes United | Dec 22 2010 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution Requesting Serious Opportunities for Public Input into Renegotiation of Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United ask the Canadian and U.S. governments to provide a draft new GLWQA to the public for comment before finalization of the Agreement; and, |
Great Lakes United | Dec 22 2010 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution Calling For Dedicated Funding for Large-Scale Remedial Actions in the Next Canada-Ontario Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United, in concert with stakeholders, urge the Governments of Canada and Ontario to commit, on the signing of the next Canada-Ontario Agreement, to the establishment and resourcing of a 10-year, $ 1.0 billion (total) CDN fund, to be made available on a cost-share basis to municipalities for the implementation of large-scale ( (greater than $10 million CDN) Remedial Actions that address contaminated sediment, combined-sewer overflows, or other green or grey infrastructure upgrades as required to meet Beneficial Use Impairment delisting criteria in the remaining Canadian Areas of Concern. |
Great Lakes United | Dec 22 2010 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution opposing the construction of new nuclear reactor at Darlington Generation Station |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United urges the suspension of the federal environmental assessment and licensing process currently underway for the construction of up to four new nuclear reactors at the Darlington Generating Station, |
Great Lakes United | Dec 22 2010 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| An Introduction to Green Infrastructure |
This slideshow from the the Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition identifies opportunities and benefits of green infrastructure practices. |
Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition | Dec 6 2010 | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) |
| Public Participation in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Renegotiation |
Presentation explaining the need for greater public participation in the renegotiation of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, including recommendations |
Great Lakes United; Canadian Environmental Law Association | Dec 2 2010 | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) |
| Construction of New Nuclear Reactors at Darlington Generating Station |
Presentation regarding the construction of new nuclear reactors at Darlington Generating Station. |
Northwatch, Greenpeace | Dec 1 2010 | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) |
| Annual Report 2009 |
Great Lakes United's Annual Report for 2009. |
Great Lakes United | Nov 20 2010 | Report |
| Great Lakes Green Chemistry Network Wins Michigan Green Chemistry Governor's Award |
The Great Lakes Green Chemistry Network, an organization whose mission is to promote the practice of Green Chemistry in the binational Great Lakes basin, has won the 2010 Michigan Green Chemistry Governor's Award for outstanding work by a public sector organization to advance green chemistry. |
Great Lakes Green Chemistry Network | Oct 29 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Release: Groups Warn of Radioactive Waste Shipping Risks on Great Lakes | Beyond Nuclear, Great Lakes United | Sep 16 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions | |
| Letter to Leaders Regarding the Shipment of Steam Generators |
This letter and the accompanying resolution requests immediate action to halt the shipment of sixteen radioactively contaminated nuclear steam generators, each weighing more than 100 metric tonnes, through the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway. |
Great Lakes United | Sep 12 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| The costs and benefits of changing operations in the Chicago Waterway System | Multiple | Sep 9 2010 | Factsheet | |
| Asian carp Factsheet: Unraveling the science behind the bighead carp found in Lake Calumet |
A new report has been released which attempts to determine the life history of the bighead carp captured on June 22, 2010, in Lake Calumet, just 6 miles from Lake Michigan. Great Lakes United, in partnership with Alliance for the Great Lakes, Healing Our Waters Coalition, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Prairie Rivers Network have produced a factsheet to unravel the science and clear up some of the misconceptions behind the bighead carp found in Lake Calumet. |
GLU, HOW, NWF, NRDC, PRN | Aug 11 2010 | Factsheet |
| Water Resources Development Act Request Letter - Asian Carp |
A letter from the Great Lakes Task Force (U.S. members of Congress in the Great Lakes states) to the Committee on Environment and Public Works recommending that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers implement measures to authorize a study to separate the Great Lakes and Mississippi watersheds, and prevent the spread of invasive species. |
Multiple | May 24 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Letter to U.S. Senators urging hydrological separation for the Great Lakes from the Mississippi River |
Great Lakes United signed onto this group letter sent to key members of U.S. Congress regarding the need to separate the Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins to protect our waters from Asian carp and other damaging species. The letter describes what hydrological separation is, what benefits will come from it, and what hydrological separation does not mean. It is a useful resource for anyone seeking information about how to successfully stop invasive species from entering the Great Lakes from the Mississippi river ecosystem. The document gives a clear outline of the economic and ecological benefits of hydrological separation and urges decision makers to take action to prevent further spread of invasive species. |
Multiple | May 20 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| A Resolution in support of Ecological Separation of the Mississippi and Great Lakes basins (Advisors to the GLFC) |
A joint resolution from the U.S. and Canadian advisors to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission supporting the ecological separation of the Mississippi River basin from teh Great Lakes basin, and calling upon the Great Lakes Fishery Commission to support this position. The resolution also expressses frustration that aquatic invasive species continue to menace the Great Lakes ecosystem after decades of experience with the ecological, social, and economic devastation to the Great Lakes region by exotic species such as sea lamprey, zebra mussels, and the more than 180 other species that have invaded and continue to invade the Great Lakes as a result of legislative and regulatory inaction, and call for immediate implementation of the recommendations of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration to address all major invasive species pathways. |
Advisors to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission | Mar 25 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Letter to the US Army Corps of Engineers |
Letter to the US Army Corps of Engineers: Comments regarding preparation of Environmental Assesment |
Multiple | Mar 12 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Preliminary Comments and Recommendations on Governance Issues for Consideration During the 2010 Renegotiation of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
Preliminary comments and recommendations on governance matters. Increasingly, those involved in Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) matters assert that one of the prime reasons for our failure to achieve more under the GLWQA is the flawed nature and functioning of government institutions and processes around the Agreement. |
Multiple | Feb 15 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Letter re: Public Consultation during GLWQA Renegotiation |
We write today to recommend important changes to the public consultation process for the renegotiation of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The process outlined by the governments on their January 14 public Webinar is inadequate and unsatisfactory. The process outlined will not provide for sufficient public input that is both relevant and meaningful to you as you renegotiate the agreement. We urge you to re-evaluate your consultation plans and make changes to the process to ensure the public consultation process undertaken this year is as or more robust than the one that the Canadian and U.S. governments followed in their 1987 negotiations. |
Multiple | Jan 26 2010 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Great Lakes United's Green Book |
A resource developed for the Great Lakes United TALL SHIPS CHALLENGE® 2010, the Green Book is a introductory guide to the problems affecting the Great Lakes in 2010. Topics include water conservation, Asian carp, toxics and pollution, wind energy and green gardening. |
Great Lakes United | Jan 6 2010 | Report |
| Great Lakes Task Force Sign on Letter - Asian Carp Action Needed |
The Great Lakes Task Force has begun circulating the attached letter to the Great Lakes Congressional delegation for sign on. The letter calls on the Army Corps of Engineers, the Coast Guard, the EPA and the US Fish & Wildlife Service to take immediate action to keep the Asian carp out of the Great Lakes. |
Great Lakes Task Force | Dec 7 2009 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Comments: Proposed Rulemaking and Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Standards for Living Organisms in Ships’ Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters |
Comments in regard to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Standards for Living Organisms in Ships' Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters, Docket No. USCG-2001-10486. The comments are co-signed by Alliance for the Great Lakes, Great Lakes United, Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes Coalition, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the National Wildlife Federation, in consultation with the Conservation Law Center, Inc. |
Alliance for the Great Lakes; Great Lakes United; Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes Coalition; Natural Resources Defense Council; National Wildlife Federation | Dec 3 2009 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |