Great Lakes United  
Join Our Mailing List: go
Invasive Species Join Us
AGM 2008 Join Us

Asian Carp Issue Letter

September 24, 2002

Everett Wilson, Chief
Division of Environmental Quality
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 322
Arlington, VA 22203

Dear Mr. Wilson:

I am writing on behalf of Great Lakes United regarding the proposed rule to list the black carp as an injurious species of wildlife under the federal Lacey Act, as published in the Federal Register (Vol. 67, No. 146, RIN 1018-AG70). Great Lakes United is an international coalition of over 150 environmental and conservation organizations, unions, academia and businesses in the U.S., Canada, First Nations and tribes dedicated to the protection and restoration of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. This comment letter is being submitted electronically and via mail.

Great Lakes United supports:

Listing of black carp as an injurious species of wildlife under the federal Lacey Act
Expansion of the Lacey Act listing to include other Asian carp species, including the bighead, grass and silver carp
Removal of species of carp where currently stocked or traded in the U.S.

Great Lakes United is extremely concerned with the threat of Asian carp invading the Great Lakes basin and compromising the already faltering biological integrity of Great Lakes waters. The threat of Asian carp invading the Great Lakes is tremendous. The black carp, for example, prey heavily on native shellfish, clams and mussels, which are already under considerable stress due to invasion by the invasive zebra mussels. The combination of competition by the zebra mussels and the predation by black carp may drive native bivalve and univalve species to extinction. Carp also pose a significant risk to native fish species, due to the carp’s voracious appetite, high fecundity, and tendency to modify its environment. These characteristics could lead to disruptions in native fish behavior, including feeding and spawning, and eventually fish population extirpations.

Great Lakes United supports the black carp listing to be expanded to include the bighead, grass and silver carp species. This would eliminate interstate shipment of live Asian carp for trade. These two bighead and silver carp species have not yet invaded the Great Lakes, and every effort to prevent this species from entering the Lakes should be taken.
Due to the threat of living carp stocks already in held in the U.S., Great Lakes United would support efforts to immediately remove the black carp, or other species listed as an injurious under the federal Lacey Act, from trade, markets, fish ponds, or wherever they may be found.

Further, to help get the horse back in front of the cart, Great Lakes United promotes the creation of permitted (white) lists, as well as prohibited (black) lists. Any species not listed as permitted should be prohibited from entering the United States until reviewed and proven safe by an independent scientific panel, and also reviewed publicly through the Federal Register. Current regulations allow importation of some species that are later deemed injurious. This is simply a backwards approach and should be ameliorated. This approach often lists species as injurious after extensive private investment, after injurious species already escaped into the wild, and after prevention measures are no longer available. This approach would regularly require extensive, expensive and questionably effective and safe control measures for species listed as injurious. If U.S. businesses are allowed to continue investing money importing potentially injurious species, any future efforts to regulate these species will be even more contested than they are presently. This is unnecessarily divisive and should be avoided. To protect the Great Lakes biological integrity, fish communities, fisheries and general public, the burden of proof must be satisfied before entry is permitted. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (through the current permitting process) single-handedly holds the keys to the future of the Nation’s aquatic resources. That is wrong. Permitting authority should therefore be placed under control of the U.S. Department of the Interior.

We encourage federal agencies to take immediate, aggressive action with regard to limit the spread of Asian carp and other invasive species, issues and make strong decisions to protect the Great Lakes biological integrity, fish communities, fisheries and the general public. Unfortunately, the Great Lakes are in a position where no compromise on this issue is acceptable—the basin integrity is “deteriorating from an acceptable state” (from the Environmental Protection Agency and Environment Canada report on the State of the Lakes 2001), and invasive species are the number one cause of species change in the Great Lakes (International Joint Commission’s 11th biennial report, page 29). Invasion by Asian carp would inflict significant modifications to the ecosystem, and could be catastrophic.

Great Lakes United will support strong federal action taken to control the introduction and spread of invasive aquatic species and exotics. The Fish and Wildlife Service should take immediate, aggressive action to list and control black carp under the federal Lacey Act earlier than now.. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this critical issue.