Home

policy recommendations

Resolution on the review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

Description: 

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United (GLU) and its members participate in the governments’ review of the GLWQA, and Be it further resolved that GLU confer with its members throughout the review process to develop positions on actions that should be taken as outcomes from the review, and Be it further resolved that GLU continue to consult with its members and communicate to the governments recommendations to improve the review process as it moves forward, and Be it finally resolved that GLU communicate to the governments that the review should first review the purpose and scope of the GLWQA and provide for broad public review, before review of Agreement and Annexes.

Author: 
Great Lakes United
Organization: 
Great Lakes United
Date published: 
Jun 11 2006
Content Type: 
Great Lakes United resolution
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

An action plan on invasive species

Description: 

This report outlines five areas in which the Obama administration and 111th Congress can take action to stop invasive species in the United States. It includes: screening intentional imports; preventing inadvertent introductions; funding early detection and response; federal leadership; addressing other funding gaps.

Author: 
National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species
Organization: 
National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species
Date published: 
Jan 13 2009
Content Type: 
Report
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

An opinion on the governors and premiers’ proposed “Annex Implementing Agreements”

Description: 

Op-ed dispelling myths surround the Annex Agreements, and explaining why the agreements are a positive step forward for Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River protection.

Author: 
Jackson, John; Gilbert, Reg; Hall, Hoah
Organization: 
Great Lakes United; National Wildlife Federation
Date published: 
Sep 20 2004
Content Type: 
Letter, comment, or government submissions

Despite needing some improvement, agreements proposed by the ten Great Lakes governors and premiers provide much better defenses against U.S. diversion proposals while leaving in place strong diversion bans recently passed by Canada, Ontario, and Québec.

A widespread myth on both sides of the international border is that the Great Lakes are already well protected from U.S. water diversions. After all, a U.S. federal law allows any one of the eight Great Lakes governors to veto diversion proposals for any reason.

Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

Environmental Group Comments on the Proposed State-Provincial “Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement”

Description: 

Comments on the Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement.

Author: 
Great Lakes United
Organization: 
Great Lakes United
Date published: 
Sep 7 2004
Content Type: 
Letter, comment, or government submissions
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

Environmental Group Comments on the Proposed International “Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement”

Description: 

Comments on the Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement.

Author: 
Great Lakes United
Organization: 
Great Lakes United
Date published: 
Oct 18 2004
Content Type: 
Letter, comment, or government submissions
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

Environmental Group Comments on the Proposed “Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Compact”

Description: 

Comments on the Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Compact.

Author: 
Great Lakes United
Organization: 
Great Lakes United
Date published: 
Oct 18 2004
Content Type: 
Letter, comment, or government submissions
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

The Nature Conservancy Comments on the Annex 2001 Draft Implementing Agreement

Description: 

Comments by the Nature Conservancy on the Annex 2001 draft Implementing Agreement.

Author: 
The Nature Conservancy
Organization: 
The Nature Conservancy
Date published: 
Aug 30 2004
Content Type: 
Letter, comment, or government submissions
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

Diversions and “Annex” Water Agreements

Description: 

Background information on considerations for the development of the Annex agreements.

Author: 
Great Lakes United
Organization: 
Great Lakes United
Date published: 
Sep 10 2004
Content Type: 
Factsheet
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit

A way forward: Strengthening decision-making and accountability under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

Description: 

This report focuses on the role and actions of the federal governments (with a particular emphasis on the Canadian government), the Binational Executive Committee, and the International Joint Commission. The report is viewed principally through the lens of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, an historic pollution prevention document signed by Canada and the United States. The authors call for the two governments to reinvigorate leadership on clean-up and protection through the present review and possible renegotiation of the Agreement, and to fully involve the public throughout this process.

Author: 
Jackson, John; Kraft Sloan, Karen
Organization: 
Great Lakes United
Date published: 
Jan 14 2008
Content Type: 
Report
Usage Restriction: 
For free use – please credit
Syndicate content