Description:
Op-ed dispelling myths surround the Annex Agreements, and explaining why the agreements are a positive step forward for Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River protection.
Author:
Jackson, John; Gilbert, Reg; Hall, Hoah
Organization:
Great Lakes United; National Wildlife Federation
Content Type:
Letter, comment, or government submissions
Despite needing some improvement, agreements proposed by the ten Great Lakes governors and premiers provide much better defenses against U.S. diversion proposals while leaving in place strong diversion bans recently passed by Canada, Ontario, and Québec.
A widespread myth on both sides of the international border is that the Great Lakes are already well protected from U.S. water diversions. After all, a U.S. federal law allows any one of the eight Great Lakes governors to veto diversion proposals for any reason.
Usage Restriction:
For free use – please credit