Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization |
Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Costs of Automotive Mercury Recycling |
Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the cost of recycling mercury from cars is discussed. |
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation | Feb 21 2001 | Conference proceedings |
| Mercury Pollution from Automobile Recycling |
Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the impacts of mercury pollution from car recycling is explored. |
Ecology Center | Feb 21 2001 | Conference proceedings |
| Extended Producer Responsibility policy approach to solving environmental impacts of disposing and recycling end-of-life vehicles: the case of the European Union ELV directive |
Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation European policies for end of life vehicles is explored. |
University of Tennessee | Feb 21 2001 | Conference proceedings |
| Implementing EPR regulations and programs in North America |
Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the barriers and benefits to EPR regulations in North American are explored. |
Environment Canada | Feb 21 2001 | Conference proceedings |
| The US Carpet Recycling Industry |
Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation carpet recycling in the US is discussed. |
Office of Environmental Assistance, State of Minnesota | Feb 21 2001 | Conference proceedings |
| Promoting EPR in the Civil Society |
Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the possibilities for EPR adoption are explored. |
Canadian Auto Workers | Feb 21 2001 | Conference proceedings |
| The Clean Car Campaign |
Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the successes and challenges of the Clean Car Campaign are explored. |
Clear Car Campaign | Feb 21 2001 | Conference proceedings |
| Toxics in Vehicles: Mercury |
The United States had a record 210 million automobiles on the road in 1999, up 15 million from 1994, and the total for all of North America in 1996 was more than 235 million. Each year, some 12 million of these vehicles are retired from useful life. Many of the materials used in their production create problems along the way, either in the vehicleÕs manufacture, use or end-of-life. This report examines the historic and continuing use of the highly toxic metal mercury in automobiles and estimates its releases to the environment from end-of-life vehicle (ELV) processing. The report will show that emissions from vehicle recycling and disposal processes are one of the largest sources of mercury contamination to the environment. The report also examines strategies for cleaner production and proposes key policy solutions to eliminate mercury hazards from both new and existing vehicles. |
Ecology Center; Great Lakes United; University of Texas Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies | Jan 21 2001 | Report |
| Practical Problems with POPs Exemptions How U.S.-Proposed General Exemptions Undermine the International POPs Treaty |
The United States government has proposed that a number of general exemptions be included in the international treaty on persistent organic pollutants (POPs). This document explains how these exemptions will undermine the treaty. |
Great Lakes United; Pesticide Action Network | Nov 17 2000 | Report |
| The Pollution of Pisces: Fish Advisories and Chemical Contaminants in the Great Lakes States |
Fish advisories are warnings to the public from state health departments and federal agencies that eating certain fish poses a danger to health because of chemical contamination. They provide graphic public testimony to the risks chemical contamination poses to local and regional ecosystems. The Great Lakes region of the United States contains a disproportionate share of the nations fish advisories. While the states bordering the Great Lakes account for 27 percent of the nations people, they are home to 75 percent of the nations fish advisories and 72 percent of all of the nations fish advisories due to POPs contamination. Fully 100 percent of the Great Lakes waters and their connecting waters are under advisories. |
Clean Water Fund; Ecology Center; Great Lake United; Lake Michigan Federation; Michigan Environmental Council; Sierrra Club Great Lakes Office | Nov 16 2000 | Report |
| A Resolution to Develop a Lakewide Management Plan for Lake Huron |
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that Great Lakes United spare no effort to convince the |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution on Pickering "A" Nuclear Station |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:(1) Great Lakes United rcspcctfi~llyrc quests Canada's Minister of the Environment to appoint an independent panel to review the re-start of the Pickering "A" nuclear station; and (2) Great Lakes United respectfully requests the Environment Minister to instruct the panel to reconsider the scope of the review, and to include amongst other issues the review of a severe accident with loss of containment, alternative means of generating electricity, and an economic evaluation of the re-start proposal and its alternatives. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution on Regulating Mine Effluent |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United, in concert with its member |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution on Protecting the Zoar Valley Multiple Use Area |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United hereby supports full protection of all old growth from any logging or disturbance in Zoar Valley Multiple Use Areas and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes any logging in the Valentine Flats and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports keeping Valentine Flats off limits to motorized vehicles. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution on Alternative Sea Lamprey Controls |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United commends the U.S. Government for |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| A Resolution on the Elimination of Commercial Timber Extraction on Federal Lands |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports prohibition of logging for the purpose of commercial timber extraction on federal lands, as the first step towards managing Great Lakes forested ecosystems sustainably. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution Against Public Subsidies from Nuclear Power in the Great Lakes |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that governments be requested to legislate the permanent |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution to Adopt Advocating Removal of the Robert Moses Parkway |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United members advocate the removal |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Kesolution for a Legally Binding Global POPs Treaty |
Therefore be it resolved: Great Lakes United calls upon the US and Canadian Federal |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution to Restore Native Fish to the Great Lakes |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes go on record in favor of an extensive program to bring native fish populations up to levels supportable by the forage base through restoration, and that further stocking of non-native fish species be annually reduced until final elimination of such stocking is achieved. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 4 2000 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Health Effects (1 of 3) |
Health Canada's Great Lakes Health Effects Program prepared an analysis of health statistics for each of the Canadian AOCs that "may be linked to exposure to environmental contaminants." While not directly making a cause and effect link, each report stated what kinds of chemicals are known to result in particular health problems. The Health Canada reports were printed and ready for release by November 1998. The government, however, withheld them and they weren't released until almost a year later in October 1999. This was only because the government was forced to after community activists gained access to them and gave them to a news reporter. The Health Canada release was brief and they were quickly removed from the web and buried again. Shortly thereafter, Health Canada closed down its ground-breaking Great Lakes Health Effects Program. This document compiles reports for the following Areas of Concern: Jackfish Bay, Nipigon Bay, Peninsula Harbour, St. Marys River, and Thunder Bay. |
Health Canada | Oct 1 1999 | Report |
| Great Lakes Health Effects (2 of 3) |
Health Canada's Great Lakes Health Effects Program prepared an analysis of health statistics for each of the Canadian AOCs that "may be linked to exposure to environmental contaminants." While not directly making a cause and effect link, each report stated what kinds of chemicals are known to result in particular health problems. The Health Canada reports were printed and ready for release by November 1998. The government, however, withheld them and they weren't released until almost a year later in October 1999. This was only because the government was forced to after community activists gained access to them and gave them to a news reporter. The Health Canada release was brief and they were quickly removed from the web and buried again. Shortly thereafter, Health Canada closed down its ground-breaking Great Lakes Health Effects Program. This document compiles reports for: Collingwood Harbour, Detroit River, Severn Sound, Spanish Harbour, St. Clair River and Wheatley Harbour. |
Health Canada | Oct 1 1999 | Report |
| Great Lakes Health Effects (3 of 3) |
Health Canada's Great Lakes Health Effects Program prepared an analysis of health statistics for each of the Canadian AOCs that "may be linked to exposure to environmental contaminants." While not directly making a cause and effect link, each report stated what kinds of chemicals are known to result in particular health problems. The Health Canada reports were printed and ready for release by November 1998. The government, however, withheld them and they weren't released until almost a year later in October 1999. This was only because the government was forced to after community activists gained access to them and gave them to a news reporter. The Health Canada release was brief and they were quickly removed from the web and buried again. Shortly thereafter, Health Canada closed down its ground-breaking Great Lakes Health Effects Program. This document compiles reports for: Bay of Quinte, Hamilton Harbour, Metro Toronto, Niagara River, Port Hope Harbour, St. Lawrence River. |
Health Canada | Oct 1 1999 | Report |
| Resolution on genetic engineering of foods |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that GLU supports an immediate moratorium on the growing of |
Great Lakes United | Jun 13 1999 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Resolution on above ground storage of radioactive waste |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls on the Federal Cabinet to immediately overrule the Minister's decision and direct her to make preparations for a full, independent panel environmental assessment hearing to fully address the health and social concerns expressed by the public. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 13 1999 | Great Lakes United resolution |