Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization |
Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Water Act and Income Protection |
THEREFORE BE II' RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will work closely with affiliated labor organizations, the bi-national labor movement at large, and other environmental organlzations in the U.S. and Canada, through the GLU LaborIEnvironment Task Force, to assure that the goals and interests of affected workers as well as those of the binational environmental community are considered to the maximum extent possible; AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United will campaign for, educate on, fully support, and if necessary, initiate, the inclusion of income protection language in the Clean Water Act; AND TEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the GLU LabourIEnvironment Task Force will seek to work with the labour movement in Canada on an ongoing basis to explore and investigate legislative mechanisms for the inclusion of income protection language in Canadian clean water legislation, as well, such as MlSA and others which may arise in the future. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Expanding Right to Know in Canada and United States |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the United States Congress to expand the current right to know reporting requirements to include more facilities and more chemicals, to close the recycling loophole, to require reporting on the use and production of toxic chemicals, to expand reporting on hazardous waste, and to require companies to develop toxic use reduction plans, by passing H.R. 2880 and equivalent Senate legislation; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Canadian Federal Government to develop a strong, comprehensive right to know program that will require reporting on the use, production, and release of toxic chemicals, as well as information on the storage and handling of toxic chemicals that can be used to asslst in emergency preparedness and accident prevention programmes. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Support Basin Business |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United make it a policy to look first at purchasing, where possible, environmentally sound products that are produced in unionized shops within the Great Lakes Basin in order to promote a sustainable economy in the Basin. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| US Federal Wetlands Legislation |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes HR 1330 and S 1463 and endorses HR 4255 as an important, fair legislative tool to halt further loss of wetlands in the US.; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United will communicate this position to all U.S. Senators and Representatives from Great Lakes states within the next month. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Legacy Natural Heritage Areas Program |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will work to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy Program to preserve natural areas as reservoirs of biodiversity and protect the best examples of biodiversity in aquatic and terrestrial sites located in pristine or restored areas of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU strongly urges the Council of Great Lakes Governors to provide regional political leadership necessary to establish and implement the Great Legacy program, a Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin-wide biodiversity conservation strategy; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU urges the states and provinces in the Great Lakes Basin as well as local units of government to take expeditious and appropriate steps to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy program; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be conveyed to the Governors and Premlers of the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Basin and the office of the Council of Great Lakes Governors. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| NYS Environmental Trust Fund |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the establishment of an Environmental Trust Fund in New York State which:
|
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Protection for Long Point, Ontario |
BE IT RESOLVED, that the government of Ontario be urged to take the steps outlined above with respect to the Long Polnt watershed: AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the governments of Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York across Lake Erie from Long Point and the federal governments of Canada and the United States, through the appropriate legislators, agencies and ministries, the International Joint Commisslon, and non-governmental agencies and groups be urged to ask the Ontario government to pursue the actions listed above to protect and preserve Long Point, a world class example of biodiversity and variety of natural habitat. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Reauthorization of the US Endangered Species Act |
NOW BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that Great Lakes Unlted supports passage of HR 4045 and will communicate this position to Congressmen from the Great Lakes states. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Human Health Project |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Task Force takes into account that:
|
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Requesting Indiana Join in Funding the Great Lakes Protection Fund |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, be It resolved by the delegates assembled for the 10th Annual Meeting of Great Lakes United (GLU) request the State of Indiana to contribute to the Great Lakes Protection Fund. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Calling for the Passage of the United States Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Reform Act |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes legislation is needed to strengthen and revise the Occupational Safety and Heallh Act; AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the prompt passage of the Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Reform Act (S. 1622, H.R. 3160). AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Congress appropriate and allocate adequate funding to fully implement all aspects of the Reform legislation. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Ontario Waste Management Corporation |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes Untted urges the Ontario Government to drop its plans to build a hazardous waste incinerator and landfill; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Ontario Government to divert the money it is now putting into the OWMC lnto waste reduction activities. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Islands and Shoals |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United call on State and Provincial jurisdictions to call for a moratorium on further development of Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River islands until a scientific inventory of lslands and shoals and a plannlng vision are completed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU request the U.S. and Canadian Nature Conservancies, the Center for the Great Lakes and local land trusts to pursue a protective strategy towards islands and shoals basin-wide, and that such private not-for-profits in conjunction with governments further promulgate an approach to development that protects the natural resources, open space, and scenic and heritage value of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Lake Calument Airport |
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United representing environmental, labor and civic organizations and communities throughout the eight states and two provinces of the Great Lakes region hereby oppose the construction of the Lake Calumet Airport in Chicago and northwest Indiana and recommend more serious, good-faith efforts to develop alternate means of surface and/or air transportation to relieve any current or potential air haffic congestion at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Kenosha Diversion |
THEREFORE, Great Lakes United demands a formal investigation of the Kenosha diversion by the Wisconsin Justice Department, Wisconsin State Legislature. the Council of Great Lakes Governors and the Michigan Attorney General, to determine how it could occur, what state laws were also broken, how to enforce the cessation of the diversion, and any penalties that may be appropriate. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Quebec-Canada St. Lawrence River Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Quebec - Canada Agreement include a section specifying that the St. Lawrence River clean up effort must have a public participation component similar to the ones In C.O.A. and the GLWQA. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition Congress to Increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to Inflation since 1980; these programs Include, but are not limited to: 1. NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Michigan DNR |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the abolishment of the citizen boards and commission. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Public Involvement in the Negotation of a Revised Canada-Ontario Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges both negotiating partles to the Canada-Ontario Agreement to: 1) Acknowledge the right of the publlc and thereby the right of the R.A.P. Public Advisory Committees to be provided the opportunity to present public concerns and expectations to both negotiating parties, respecting the R.A. P. process and Implementation of remedial actions within C .O.A.; and 2) Provide such oppohunity In good faith and prior to finalizing a C.O.A. draft document to ensure full opportunity for consideration and inclusion of public expressions and recommendations in all C.O.A. negotiations; and 3) Recognize the urgency for completing a new C.O.A. and therefore arranging for public consultation without any further delay. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Reform the National Flood Insurance Program |
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United strongly supports S. 1650. and calls on Senator Riegle, and all other Great Lakes Senators to protect the bill from weakening changes and promptly pass the bill in the Senate Banking Committee and full Senate. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Wolfe and North Fox Islands |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU call on the Province of Ontario to conduct a thorough review of the proposed Mathews prolect under the Environmental Assessment Act and the Federal Canadian Government under the Environmental Assessment Review Process in order to ensure that the project will have the minimum adverse impact on the island's natural resources, the rural community of Wolfe lsland and the international Thousand Islands region. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Diversions |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its opposition to any out-of-basin diversion, AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United specifically oppcses the Lowell, IN diversion. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| US EPA's Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United, at its 1992 annual meeting in Saginaw, Michigan, calls upon U.S. EPA Administrator William Reilly to restore the public's right of access and right to comment on the importance of the lnitiative by immediately publishing the draft rules in the Federal Register and holding public hearings, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we call on governments at all levels to immediately implement programs to stop the discharge of toxic chemicals into Great Lakes and their tributaries, and to implement the promises in the U.S.€anada Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and the U.S. Clean Water Act. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that GLU calls upon all its member organizations to write Administrator William Reilly calling for the immediate publication of the draft rules in the Federal Register. Additionally, the letter should request that during public comment period, EPA provide education and Information dissemination as part of the public hearings. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, GLU encourages member organizations to educate their members about the issues pertaining to the Great Lakes initiative in preparation to actively participate In the public hearings along with submitting written comments during the public comment period. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Clean Water Jobs Program |
THEREFORE, Great Lakes United supports the Labor and Environmental Clean Water/Jobs Funding Proposal which:
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will work with Industry, Labor and Environmental Groups In the Great Lakes Basin and nationwide to promote this Clean Water/Jobs Program as part of the Clean Water Act debate, ensure that new facilities built wlth these funds are separated from toxic industrial wastes and inform the Great Lakes Congressional Delegalion of this resolution. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Implement Indiana's Water Quality Standards |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the delegates assembled for the 10th Annual Meeting of Great Lakes United, this 3rd day of May, 1992, that: 1) The lndiana Water Pollution Control Board, IWPCB, be requested to adopt proposed revisions to Indiana's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, NPDES, rule, 327 IAC 5, as expeditiously as possible to implement limits in NPDES permits for discharges to the State's surface waters which will assure standards In 327 IAC 2-1 that adequately protect human, terrestrial, and aquatic life from the toxic Impacts of water pollutants are met: AND 2) The IWPCB Include In those revisions, a requirement to phase out as expeditiously as possible the use of mixing or any dilution allowances for discharges of both the 43 pollutants annotated in Indiana's new water quality standards rule "to be bloconcentrating and of concern" and to sunset these and any other chemicals currently Identified and any other pollutants cunently Identified by the U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative as "Bioaccumulative Chemicals of Concern," AND 3) The IWPCB include in those revisions, a requirement to employ alternative techniques, such as monitoring of internal processes, caged biota studies, or regular analysis of tissues of resident fish species for detecting and restricting discharges of pollutants whose water'quality based effluent limits are below levels of detection or quantitation; AND 4) The WPCB retain the State's ability In those revisions to enforce the Level of Detection as a compliance point in NPDES permits when water quality based effluent limits are below the Level of Detection; AND 5) To prevent further loading of pollutants in impaired waters, the IWPCB prohibit in those revisions, discharges of Intake water containing concentrations of a background pollutant in excess of its water quality based effluent limit to receiving waters that are not from the same source as the intake water; AND 6) The IWPCB retain the variance provision in the new water quality standards rule, 327 IAC 2-1 -8.8, and in revisions to the NPDES rule, that will place a burden of proof on a discharger to make the maximum effort possible to meet a water quality based effluent limit for a pollutant, through reducing, eliminating or treating a pollutant in the effluent, before being eligible for consideration of a variance from meeting that water quality based effluent limit; AND 7) To cleanup Indiana's impaired surface waters, the IWPCB not add criteria for variances to the new water quality standards rule or the NPDES rule revisions that would include conditions in the receiving stream, such as background pollutants, low flow, other physical features or human induced conditions as grounds for considering variances from meeting water quality standards. |
Great Lakes Universe | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |