Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title |
Description |
Organization | Date published | Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the areat Lakes United Board of Directors be charged with the responsibility of establishing an ongoing working body responsible for the promotion of environmental awareness, either through the establishment of an ongoing task force or through a formal working relationship with Great Lakes Tomorrow and other related educational organizations. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems and Pretreatment |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, GLU recommends that BPI, the states and provinces and municipalities place a high priority on the evaluation and control of industrial discharges to municipal treatment systems; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, environmental groups and local citizens actively participate in the overview of development and implementation of local pretreatment programs; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, municipalities with adequate technical and financial assistance from the federal, state, and provincial agencies assure that adequate monitoring is conducted to identify and determine the need for control of toxic substances. This evaluation shall not be limited to EPA'a priority pollutants and should focus on industrial raw materials, catalysts, intermediates, by- products, etc. The evaluation shall include periodic sludge, air and effluent evaluations. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Farm Bill |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakea United supports these provisions in the 1985 Farm Bill; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United supports the reforms of existing federal farm programs t a remove subeidies for production of surplus crops on wetlands drained and cleared after 1981. |
Great Lakes United | May 15 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Fish and Wildlife Habitat Chicago World's Fair |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United at its annual meeting in Toronto, May 13, 1984, opposes any filling of Lake Michigan for the 1992 World's Fair. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Permanent Solution to Toxic Landfills |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United calls upon the Environrental Protection Agency to replace their general policy for remedial action at abondoned hazardous waste sites in the Great Lakes Basin with a policy which emphasises permanent solutions to these problems through: |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Permanent Solutions to Toxic Landfills |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United calls upon the Environrental Protection Agency to replace their general policy for remedial action at abondoned hazardous waste sites in the Great Lakes Basin with a policy which emphasises permanent solutions to these BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United be authorized to join local organizations actively opposing construction and operation of new land burial facilities such as CECOS Secure Chemical Residue Facility (SERF) #6 being proposed by CECOS Int'l. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Land Use Land Quality |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United encourages that adequate funding levels for government efforts to reduce non-point pollution be establiahed, coordinated and maintained; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, voluntary coneervatioa measures be achieved through incentives and by example and that local direction for non-point pollution probleme be emphasized as a primary component in such an effort. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Run-Off Resolution |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United encourages the use of theee known and innovative techniques to clean and keep clean the waters of the Qreat Lakes. We specifically applaud the Sod Buster and Swanp Bueter provisions of the new Agriculture Bill and stream restoration techniquea being initiated by state and federe1 natural reesource agencies. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Navigation II |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United reaffirm its Navigation Resolution of 1983; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Navigation Task Force undertake the preparation of a poeition paper representing the Great Lakee United view of commercial navigation use of the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence. In the preparation of this poaition paper, the task force will consider the need to place the issue of navigation on the Great Lakes within the wider context of social, economic and environmental factors--the ecosystem approach. Specifically, the task force shall address navigation issues, including:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, with these considerations in mind the task force shall develop a Great Lakes United action strategy for effective protection of the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the task force shall submit its poaition paper and recomrendations to the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting in 1985, with recorrendationa for inmediate action forwarding to the Board of Directors in the interim. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Adequate Enforcement and Implementation of Environmental Laws |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United work work with its member organizations at the state, provincial and national levels to: 1. assess and analyze the staffing and funding needs of state, national and international programs that should operate to protect the Great Lakes from pollution and mismanagement, |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Wetlands Protection |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United: - opposes any attempts to reduce the scope of the Section 404 program or the protections now given wetlands by the U.S. EPAss 404(b) (1) Guidelines;
|
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Fish and Wildlife Habitat |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United: -- encourages the Province of Ontario to develop further legislation with the goal of preservation of remaining wetlands; -- recommends that decisions pertaining to any wetlands program, particularly drainage, include participation by the public; and -- suggest that a system of tax relief for owners of wetlands be developed to encourage the retention of such areas on private landa. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Reauthorization of the Coastal Zone Management Act |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Coastal Management Act be reauthorized with continued etrong federal support for state management programs; and BE IT FURTHER RBSOLVBD THAT, special emphasis and additional funding be provided for additional acquisition of estuarine sanctuaries forprotection and study; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the crippling Supreme Court decision undermining the consietency provision be overturned in the area of offahore oil and gas leaeing, and that the federal consistency provision be strengthened to encompass other important federal activities, such as the designation of ocean incineration sites; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Coaetal Zone Management Act, with a reinstituted consistency provision for ell federal activities directly affecting states' coastal zonee, be expeditiously reauthorized by Congress at adequate funding levels during the 1984 legielative session. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Use of Oil Over-Charge Monies |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes states apply a significant amount of funds to long-term and meaningful energy conservation efforts and utilization of renewable energy sourcee consistent with the court decieion. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Navigation on the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence River Waterway System |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes United navigation task force should be broadened and continue its work for the purpose of: (1) investigating the critical issues which have been advanced in the position paper and any others which may arise; and (2) work along with Great Lakes United members in the development and refining of an action strategy for implementation of Great Lakes United resolutions on commercial navigation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United Navigation's Task Force-promote the following recommendations: The establishment of uniform and coordinated regulatory standards and rules governing commercial navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System which takes the unique environmental, 'social, climatic, economic conditions of the Basin into account. Elements to be coneidered in these uniform regulatory initiatives are: 1. limitation of hazardous goods transported on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System to ice free and good weather conditions; 2. and in some instances, completely banning the transportation of some kinds of hazardous material, such as radiotoxic material; 3. the enactment of provisions which would impart absolute liability for carriers and shippers of hazardous materials; 4 . the application of stringent safety requirements (which would equal thoee most stringent standards now existing in the basin); 5. the mandatory development of proven containment and clean-up provisions and mechanisms 6. the creation of coordinated mechanisms to ensure the proper monitoring and enforcement of the uniform regulations between Canada and the U.S 7. further research ott the ecological and human health effects of various substances and materials and the working toward a more specific and uniform definition of "hazardous" and "dangerous" material. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Navigation I |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the members of Great Lakes United are hereby advised to be prepared to communicate to Members of Congress, their concerns relative to winter navigation just prior to the vote; and to remind those Congressmen that signed the letter of opposition of their commitment; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United wishes to extend its appreciation for the outstanding contributions of several public officials who have played key roles in organizing the opposition to this legislation, including Canadian Minister of the Environment Ckarlee Caccia, Canadian-U.S. Ambassador Allan Gotlieb, Michigan Governor James Blanchard, Michigan Congressmen David Bonior, Robert Davis, Dennis Hertel, Harold Sawyer, New York Congressmen Henry Nowak and David O.B. Martin, and Minnesota Congressman James Oberstar. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Initiative |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, where the current effluent level of a discharge is below the permitted level for a particular parameter, any permit reissued shall require the current discharge level to be the new permitted level; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the wildlife criteria shall be designed to protect the most ecologically sensitive species; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the human health criteria shall be designed to protect high risk populations, including heavy consumers of fish and sensitive groups such as newborns and the elderly; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, as part of the implementation procedures, any permit which regulates discharges of bioaccumulative, persistent compounds shall include a sunset provision to phase out the use of the compound; therefore achieving zero discharge; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, any new or reissued permit must include a pollution prevention plan developed by the discharger and approved by the permitting agency; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, all aquatic, wildlife and human criteria shall be expanded to include protection from reproductive, neurological, and other non-cancer effects. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Promote Giving for Great Lakes Issues and Organizations |
THEREFORE, Be it resolved, Great Lakes United (GLU) would investigate establishing and promoting "Give Greatly" campaign to encourage individuals, foundations and companies to give of their time, talent and resources to the betterment of the Great Lakes environment. The "Give Greatly" campaign might involve:
|
Great Lakes United | Jun 7 1998 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Wolfe and North Fox Islands |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU call on the Province of Ontario to conduct a thorough review of the proposed Mathews prolect under the Environmental Assessment Act and the Federal Canadian Government under the Environmental Assessment Review Process in order to ensure that the project will have the minimum adverse impact on the island's natural resources, the rural community of Wolfe lsland and the international Thousand Islands region. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Canadian Grand Canal Program |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakea United exprasses its outrage that the Grand Canal project could even be seriously considered by Canadian private interest groups and public officials and opposes any study or further considerations of the proposal. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Preservation of Strawberry Island |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakea United provide expertise and assistance to achieve the goals of erosion control, future State ownerahip and long-term management. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourage the Federal Governmental Agencies, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and the New York Department of Parka and Recreation to apply ecologically aound methods to control erosion and to further enhance the recreational, fisheries and other natural benefits of the island. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Designating the Great Lakes as Outstanding National Resource Waters |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United at its Annual Meeting in Mackinaw City on May 16-18, 1986, commends Governor lllenchard and the Michigan Water Remources Commission for proposing to classify Michigan's waters of the Great Lakes as "outstanding national resource waters" for purposes'of U.S. EPA's water quality standards regulations; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon Governor Blanchard and the Michigan Water Resources Commission to eliminate the exception in proposed rule 1098(3) which would allow new or increased pollutant diacharges into the connecting channels or tributaries of the Great Lakes within Michigan's boundaries even if these discharges adversely affect Great Lakes water quality; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Michigan Water Resourcee Commission immediately to promulgate proposed rule 1098 designating Michigan's waters of the Great Lakes as "outstanding national resource waters," mended as suggested herein, as a revision to Michigan's water quality standards; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the other Great Lakes states immediately to revise their water quality standards to classify the open waters of the Great Lakes located within their boundaries as "outstanding national resource waters" for purposes of the U.S. BPA's water quality standard regulations. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Use of Non-Recyclable and Disposable Products |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United adopts a policy banning the use of disposable products, especially polystyrene and other plastic products, where alternative recyclable and reusable producis exist in ail its offices and at all its meetings, even when where such poiicy is understood to increase COSTS; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will adopt a policy promoting the recycling of all paper, glass and beverage czns used in its ofices and at all its meetings; AND BE IT FGRTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will adopt a policy to use recycled paper in all its publications, the office and other activities to the greatest extent possicie; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thar Great Lakes United will publicize these policies wherever possible as a means of setting a positive example and acting as a model in this area. |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1989 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Strengthening and Passage of the Michigan Scenic Rivers Act of 1990 |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United and its member organizations support passage of a strong Michigan Scenic Rivers legislation and pass our concerns on to appropriate parties. |
Great Lakes United | May 6 1990 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Sault St. Marie Lock |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes that no justification exists to spend $226.6 million at this time for a new 1300 ft. lock at Sault Ste. Marie. However, if construction of this lock is to proceed despite these objections it should include the following elements not included in the Detroit District's final interim feasibility study. They are: (1) Dredged materials be used to enhance the local environment. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |