Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Description Organization Date publishedsort icon Content Type
Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to:

1. NOAAJs Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2. EPA's Research Stations at Grosse lie, Michigan and Duluth. Minnesota;
3. Great Lakes research programs funded through the United States Commerce Department's Sea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region;
4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Fisheries Center - Great Lakes, Arbor, Michigan
5. NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
RAPs

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that RAP writing teams be advised that all RAPs should thoroughly identify and investigate all potential AOC and upstream sources of urban non-point source pollution; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all RAPs should include existing data, for all identified and likely sources of urban non-point source pollution, then make detailed recommendations for monitoring, levels of detection, specific sources, estimations of loadings, specific methods of remediation, a timetable for completion, a list of parties responsible for remediation, and a list of potential sources of funding for remediation; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that remedial measures for cleaning up urban non-point source pollution should set a goal of zero toxic discharge, with emphasis on the source reduction of polluting substances.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that remedial measures be developed in the control of urban runoff and the use of wetlands be considered as an appropriate management tool to prevent further degradation of water quality resulting from urban runoff.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Banning Chlorine in the Paper Industry

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon all U.S. and Canadian Jurisdictions on Lake Superior to ban the use of chlorine and chlorine compounds used for de-lignification and bleaching by the paper industry on Lake Superior; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United views this as a litmus test issue in determining whether or not political leaders and regulators are willing to comply with the visionary spirit of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement; AND

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a ban on the use of chlorine and chlorine compounds for de-lignification and bleaching by the paper industry throughout the Great Lakes/ St. Lawrence River Basin, throughout North America and throughout the world.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Antidegreadation Policy

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the inclusion of strong antidegradation procedures as part of the U.S. EPA's Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative. The antidegradation policies and procedures should be used to move expeditiously to zero discharge of persistent toxic substances. Such policies should be implemented in conjunction with efforts such as Lakewide Management Plans and Remedial Action Plans that set clear targets for reducing total loadings of persistent toxic chemicals in regular, enforceable steps to zero. Antidegradation review should triggered not only by proposed or actual increases above current discharges, but should be also triggered by increases above target load allocations derived from load reduction plans thereby assuring steady progress to zero discharge; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United proposes that Great Lakes antidegradation policy be implemented in such a way that:

1. any exception to antidegradation prohibitions be treated as "variances" so that decisions about proposed exceptions are made in a public forum,
2. such exceptions be allowed only after the discharger requesting exception satisfies the following hierarchy of legally enforceable requirements:
a) that the discharger has implemented a waste reduction program using the best available waste reduction/pollution prevention techniques,
b) that the discharger can prove that no environmental damage will occur and that the proof is corroborated by independent experts.
c) that economic and social factors shall not be considered reasons for variances.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Open Water Disposal in Maumee Bay

THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the U.S. and Canadian Governments not to dispose of contaminated sediments in the open waters of the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Corps of Engineers must abide by state water quality standards t o the extent mandated in Section 404 of the Clean-Water Act in determining the Federal Standard for the disposal of dredged sediments.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Continuing Government Support of Beluga Whale Research in the St. Lawrence

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United contact the Canadian Minister of the Environment and Members of Parliament to request the continued funding from the Wildlife Protection Fund for Pierre Beland's critical research and matching funds he sought from the appropriate U.S. Federal Agency t o recognize their binational responsibility to protect this endangered species.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes United Taskforce on Labour and the Environment

THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED place a high and immediate priority on obtaining new funding to support the work of the Labor/Enviranment Task Force, with the objective of supporting paid staff time and providing other necessary resources; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will introduce and promote the principle of worker compensation and economic protection as well as other options in all its pollution
prevention policies and initiatives; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the GREAT LAKES UNITED'S Taskforce on Labour and the Environment will take responsibi1ity for reviewing and evaluating current worker protection and compensation programs as they exist in the Great Lakes Basin with the future task of providing further policy recommendations to the Board as required.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in Canada

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the government of Ontario to substantially revise and immediately implement the draft Provincial Wetlands Planning Policy Statement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must immediately develop effective wetlands protection legislation and expedite its implementation and enforcement to provide effective protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must undergo a full review of the municipal land use planning and review process to ensure that it provides adequate protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the meantime, all existing statutes and regulations that provide for the protection of all wetlands must be used and enforced, including the Conservation Authorities Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, the Public Lands Act, and the Federal Fisheries Act.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in United States

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Congress of the United States to proceed deliberately in reauthorizing the Clean Water Act, and to oppose the numerous bills that would weaken wetland protection provisions of the Act, particularly Section 404; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Congress explicitly include wetland protection in the Clean Water Act Goal Statement, and that the current regulatory definition of waters of the United
States be amended to presume that all waters and wetlands are susceptible to use in interstate commerce; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the list of activities regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act be expanded to include all activities that may damage or degrade wetlands such as draining, dredging, channelizing, flooding, placement of floating and piling supported structures; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 401 should be amended to expressly broaden the protections provided by this section to include wetlands, and direct states to address physical and biological alterations of aquatic areas, as well as chemical pollution; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Nationwide permit program should be substantially revised to control ongoing cumulative wetland losses, specifically to (1) eliminate Nationwide General Permit No. 26, (2) comply with Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines, and (3) prohibit using multiple general permits to avoid the acreage limitations of other general or individual permit requirements.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Wetlands

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a new Annex specifically addressing wetlands losses and their effects on the integrity of the Great Lakes ecosystem be added to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement at its next revision; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for the wetland base in the Great Lakes Basin to be restored, the U,S, and Canadian federal governments should immediately declare the Great Lakes Basin a "demonstration region" for a "Net Gain" in wetland functions and quantity.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Hydropower Projects in the James Bay Region

THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the James Bay hydropower project until its effects on native cultures and the environment are fully addressed by New York State and Canada in a comprehensive environmental study; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports Assembly Bill 2162A as a step towards the State of New York becoming responsible consumers of electricity and for the protection of the environment; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United commends Assemblymen William B. Hoyt and Maurice D. Hinchey for their leadership in introducing Assembly bill A2162A.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Open Space Protection in Canada

BE I T RESOLVED, that to further promote and encourage the protection of land in the Province of Ontario and the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Region, that the Provincial Government be urged and encouraged to adopt legislation that will allow private not-for-profit organizations to acquire conservation easements; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Federal Government be urged to change Canadian Federal Law so that it promotes the use of the conservation easement by providing tax incentives f o r property owners, that is, making gifts of such easements tax-deductible to the property owner(s).

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Proposed Permanent Diversion of Water Out of Great Lakes Basin at Lowell Indiana

BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges the Great Lakes governors to withhold approval of Lowell's water diversion proposal; AND

BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED THAT, alternatives should be publicly examined in more detail, including the alternative for the state to commit to supporting construction of a pipeline to re-divert the water back into Lake Michigan (as was agreed to in the Wisconsin case) and also water conservation methods that will be used with timetables for implementation of these measures.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
US Bill to Expand Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United will send letters to key legislators in the House supporting the passage of Congressman Peter Viscloskeyf's Dunes Expansion bill ("The Columbus Day Comprise) ; send letters to Senators Lugar and Coats urging that a comparable or better bill be introduced in the Senate; send letters to key senators supporting the passage of such legislation this year; and encourage its constituent members to also support these efforts with letters to their senators and congress people on their own letterhead whenever feasible.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Lake Superior

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the governments of the United States, Canada, Ontario, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota to immediately implement a moratorium for new or increased discharges of persistent toxic pollutants to Lake Superior until the International Joint Commission recommendation has been implemented; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments use their statutory authority to designate Lake Superior as an Outstanding National Resource Water (ONRW) for persistent toxic pollutants, the highest protective status given to water bodies under the U.S. Clean Water Act, and that the Lake be given a similar protective status under Canadian law; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments immediately schedule a phase out of the use of chlorine in the pulp and paper industry to eliminate the major point source of persistent toxic pollutants to Lake Superior; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments take other appropriate action to implement the International Joint Commission recommendation for Lake Superior as a demonstration area.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Zero Discharge and Pollution Prevention Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Public Participation in Remedial Action Plan Implementation

BE I T FURTHER RESOLVED,

that the governments fund this public consultation process; AND

BE I T FURTHER RESOLVED,

that the Canada-Ontario Agreement formally ensure that the public is consulted in all actions undertaken to implement the Remedial Action Plans.

 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,  that the U.S. and Canadian governments ensure that the public is involved in the implementation of all U.S. and Canadian Remedial Action Plans;

AND

Great Lakes Universe May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Trail Creek Indiana

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United strongly urges the International Joint Commission to recommend, and the U.S. and Canadian federal governments to designate, Trail Creek, Indiana as an Area of Concern.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Canada-Ontario Agreement

THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United and other environmental organizations be formally included as full participants in the renegotiation of the Canada-Ontario Agreement.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Consistency of State and Provincial Regulations with the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

 

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that Great Lakes United acknowledges the leadership of former Michigan Governor Blanchard in writing an Executive Order that requires regulations and programs to be reviewed for their consistency with the GLWQA; and that other Great Lakes states and provinces be urged to make similar commitments to review regulations and programs prior to adoption to ensure their consistency with the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Initiative

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, where the current effluent level of a discharge is below the permitted level for a particular parameter, any permit reissued shall require the current discharge level to be the new permitted level; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the wildlife criteria shall be designed to protect the most ecologically sensitive species; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the human health criteria shall be designed to protect high risk populations, including heavy consumers of fish and sensitive groups such as newborns and the elderly; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, as part of the implementation procedures, any permit which regulates discharges of bioaccumulative, persistent compounds shall include a sunset provision to phase out the use of the compound; therefore achieving zero discharge; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, any new or reissued permit must include a pollution prevention plan developed by the discharger and approved by the permitting agency; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, all aquatic, wildlife and human criteria shall be expanded to include protection from reproductive, neurological, and other non-cancer effects.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Incineration in the Great Lakes Ecosystem

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United urges all levels of government in the
Great Lakes ecosystem to ban new Incinerators and to disallow expanslons of existing
Incinerators;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a comprehensive pollution prevention and clean production
strategy for dosing and phasing out existing incinerators must be immediately developed
and Implemented by industries and governments throughout the Great Lakes ecosystem.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Crystal River Wetland

THEREFORE, Great Lakes United strongly opposes political intervention in this or any other
wetland permit case and urges EPA Administrator Reilly to let his Regional Administrator's
decision stand.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Conservation of Biological Diversity Legislation

THEREFORE, be it resolved that Great Lakes United supports passage of HB 4719 and encourages passage of similar legislation in other states, provinces and by both federal governments.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Calling on Congress to Reject Trade Agreements that Abrogate US Health Safety Environmental and Labour Laws

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Great Lakes Basin delegation to the Congress to immediately cosponsor H.R. Resolution 246 and Senate Resolution 109 and to assure their passage when brought to a vote, AND

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the President of the United States to initiate and complete negotiations, as part of the Uruguay Round of GATT talks, to make the GAIT compatible with the Marine Mammal Protection Act and other United States health, safety, labor, trade and environmental laws including those laws designed to protect the environment and workers outside the geographic borders of the United States. AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the President of the United States to guarantee that the GATT, US./ Mexico or other trade agreements will not In any way reduce the authority of local and state governments to establish health, safety, labor, environmental, purchasing or procurement laws that the people and their elected representatives have passed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on the President of the United States not to enter Into any lnternational agreement - including GATT and NAFTA - and Congress not to approve any international agreement, that weakens United States' manufacturing Industries and fosters international wage competition that undermines workers living standards.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution