Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title |
Description |
Organization | Date published | Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wetland Protection in Canada |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the government of Ontario to substantially revise and immediately implement the draft Provincial Wetlands Planning Policy Statement; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must immediately develop effective wetlands protection legislation and expedite its implementation and enforcement to provide effective protection for wetlands; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must undergo a full review of the municipal land use planning and review process to ensure that it provides adequate protection for wetlands; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the meantime, all existing statutes and regulations that provide for the protection of all wetlands must be used and enforced, including the Conservation Authorities Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, the Public Lands Act, and the Federal Fisheries Act. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Expansion of the Costal Barrier Resources System to Underdeveloped Coastal Areas Along the Great Lakes |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the United States Congress to act quickly to extend the protective Coastal Barrier Resources System to undeveloped, eligible coastal barriers, such as wetlands, bluffs, dunes, and beaches, along the Great Lakes. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Expanding Right to Know in Canada and United States |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the United States Congress to expand the current right to know reporting requirements to include more facilities and more chemicals, to close the recycling loophole, to require reporting on the use and production of toxic chemicals, to expand reporting on hazardous waste, and to require companies to develop toxic use reduction plans, by passing H.R. 2880 and equivalent Senate legislation; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Canadian Federal Government to develop a strong, comprehensive right to know program that will require reporting on the use, production, and release of toxic chemicals, as well as information on the storage and handling of toxic chemicals that can be used to asslst in emergency preparedness and accident prevention programmes. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Legacy Natural Heritage Areas Program |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will work to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy Program to preserve natural areas as reservoirs of biodiversity and protect the best examples of biodiversity in aquatic and terrestrial sites located in pristine or restored areas of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU strongly urges the Council of Great Lakes Governors to provide regional political leadership necessary to establish and implement the Great Legacy program, a Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin-wide biodiversity conservation strategy; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU urges the states and provinces in the Great Lakes Basin as well as local units of government to take expeditious and appropriate steps to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy program; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be conveyed to the Governors and Premlers of the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Basin and the office of the Council of Great Lakes Governors. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Restrictions for Dredging Activities of Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that in such areas dredging activities be regulated as point sources of contamination, with permits required to ensure that environmental safeguards are in place and that best available dredging technology is used; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, where the dredgin activities of one nation may adversely affect the ecosystem of another, or where d redging activities are carried out in international waters, a binational committee, including citizens as well as government representatives, be appointed by the two federal governments; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, until such standards are developed, state of the art technologies minimizing environmental impacts for dredging equipment should be used on a site-specific basis; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that new federal appropriations be sought to develop new advanced dredging technologies; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that until comprehensive environmental impact and assessment processes are in place for contaminated sediments, a moratorium on open-water dumping should be instituted. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| RAPs |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that RAP writing teams be advised that all RAPs should thoroughly identify and investigate all potential AOC and upstream sources of urban non-point source pollution; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all RAPs should include existing data, for all identified and likely sources of urban non-point source pollution, then make detailed recommendations for monitoring, levels of detection, specific sources, estimations of loadings, specific methods of remediation, a timetable for completion, a list of parties responsible for remediation, and a list of potential sources of funding for remediation; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that remedial measures for cleaning up urban non-point source pollution should set a goal of zero toxic discharge, with emphasis on the source reduction of polluting substances. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that remedial measures be developed in the control of urban runoff and the use of wetlands be considered as an appropriate management tool to prevent further degradation of water quality resulting from urban runoff. |
Great Lakes United | May 6 1990 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Contaminated Sediments and Sediment Criteria |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that regulations with uniform numerical criteria common to both federal jurisdictions be established to determine the extent of contamination in sediment and therefore the options for disposal and treatment of that sediment; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such criteria not only measure concentrations of contaminants in sediment, but that they also take into account the cumulative effects of multiple contaminant(s), the organic content and sediment size distribution, the movement (partitioning) of contaminants between sediment and water column, and chronic as well as acute effects on biota (bioaccummulation); AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that citizens be included in the decision-making process for developing said criteria as well as in reviewing all drafts of regulations including the final criteria. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Quebec-Canada St. Lawrence River Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Quebec - Canada Agreement include a section specifying that the St. Lawrence River clean up effort must have a public participation component similar to the ones In C.O.A. and the GLWQA. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Regulations for Confined Disposal Facilities for Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that there be an immediate ban on the construction of all and any new in water diked disposal facilities in the Great Lakes; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all existing confined disposal facilities undergo a detailed review and evaluation to determine the current integrity of their barriers, such review to be carried out by appropriate government agencies in each country; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a protocol for ongoing monitoring for leaking, discharges, and progress impacts on the surrounding ecosystem be established by December, 1988 for all currently existing confined disposal facilities and that monitoring be implemented at all sites immediately, even as the protocals are being established; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an action plan for the removal and/or closure and remediation of all confined disposal facilities be developed and that remediation of confined disposal facilities in Areas of Concern be incorporated into the Remedial Action Plan for those Areas, and that this be done with the objective of determining ecosystem-positive methods of final treatment of the contiaminated sediments involved; AND Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Chlorine Phaseout |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1994 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Development of a Basin Wide Strategy to Complete and Fully Implement Remedial Action Plans |
THEREFORE Great Lakes United urges that the US Environmental Protection Agency and Environment Canada reconfirm their commitment to clean up the AOCs, and that the US EPA and Environment Canada commit the necessary federal dollars to complete and implement the RAPs; That the federal governments recognize that the same economic and corporate forces that led to degradation of water quality in the AOCs and also caused significant damage to the surrounding communities so that the US EPA and Environment Canada target substantial resources for clean up and sustainable redevelopment of surrounding communities, including assessment of health impacts and support health services; That to request their commitment to full public participation in all aspects of the RAPs, the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada should provide funding for paid independent facilitators and community organizers, as well as resources tb facilitate public participation, such as travel funding and childcare; That the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada provide funding tor the independent technical advisors and consultants to be selected to be selected by the public advisory committees; That the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada enter negotiations with Great Lakes United and other environmental public interest groups to develop a basin-wide strategy to complrte and fully implement the Remedial Action Plans. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 9 1996 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Power in Ontario |
THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVEil, that Great Lakes United's individual members and organizations, demand that the Government of Ontario immedidely institute an electricity eficiency programme aimed at reducing the ratio of electricity used per dollar Gross Provincial Product (GPP) by half; and immediately place an indefinite moratorium on the approval, planning or construciion of new nuclear power stations in the Province. |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1989 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Backsliding Modification to Waste Water Toxic Discharges in Wisconsin |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Great Lakes United that it urges the Wisconsin legislature to disapprove the new wasteload allocation regulations, and that it urges the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to disapprove the proposed modifications for the pulp and paper mills discharging into Cluster II of the Fox River absent further study of the mill's ability to continue complying with the existing permit limitations and the potential for increased discharges of toxic pollutants into the Great Lakes watershed; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thet Great Lakes United urges Wisconsin, Michigan and all the Great Lakes jurisdictions to adopt a stringent "anti-backsliding" policy which prohibits the relaxation of discharge permit effluent limitations except in exceptional circumstances; and BE IT FURTHER BESOLVED,that areat Lakes United supports the amendment of the Clean Water Act by the U.S. Congrese to include a stringent "anti-backeliding" policy which prohibits the relaxation of discharge permit effluent limitations except in exceptional circumstances; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges its member organizations to express their concern over such backsliding from permit effluent limitatione to the area Lakes jurisdictions and to the U . S . Congress. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Cancerous Tumours in Fish |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TEAT, Great Lakea United in Annual Meeting assembled May 11-13, 1984 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, urges that Federal, State, and Provincial governments, and duly constituted interstate and international bodies, as appropriate, develop biological indicators as early warning monitoring programs and cooperative tumor Registries to determine the incidence and extent of cancerous tumors in fish and of tumor-causing pollutants in the environment, throughout the United States and Canada. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, State, Provincial and Federal governments and interstate and international bodies, greatly expand their efforts to curtail the pollution of the nation's lakes, rivers and coastal waters by cancer-causing and other toxic chemicals; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Congress amend the FDA's existing statutory authority to require the FDA, when establishing "action levels" and tolerances for fish and ehellfish contaminants, to tailor these limits to specific geographic areas and subpopulations, so as to reflect better the veriations in rates of fish and shellfish consumption within the overall population; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the various jurisdictions should establish uniform and comprehensive alert and notice system fishermen and other fish and shellfieh consumers of the deleterious pollutant levels and/or tumors in fish and in their waters. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1983 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Levels and Flows I |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TEAT, Great Lakes United undertake a comprehensive collation of data and information on the proposed structural and land use options and review the risks of each so that we may better evaluate our future ections. Where there is a lack of information |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Overflow Dredging |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United actively seek to stop overflow dredging. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Week |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United encourages the development of educational programs concerned with environmental issues. The organization urges its members to work on programs in their own localities, particularly for Great Lakes Week. Great Lakes United further recommends that the programs for Great Lakes Week be geared to attract a wider audience by including topics relating to environment (historical, recreational, etc,). |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Phase-Out of Nuclear Generating Stations |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United play a facilitating role in bringing |
Great Lakes United | Jun 9 1996 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Promoting the Canadian Coalition for Green Health Care |
Therefore, be it resolved that Great Lakes United promote the goals of Health Care Without Harm and the Canadian Coalition for Green Health Care. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 10 2001 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Airborne Toxic Pollutants |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United recommends the following refinements to state, federal and provincial air quality programs: Sources of non-criteria pollutants should use Best Available Control Technology to reduce and/or eliminate toxic releases. Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Legislative Hearings on Toxic Deposition |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United requests the: United States House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce; and |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Conservation of Biological Diversity Legislation |
THEREFORE, be it resolved that Great Lakes United supports passage of HB 4719 and encourages passage of similar legislation in other states, provinces and by both federal governments. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Creation of Two-headed River National Park |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United supports the establishment of the Two-Hearted River National Park if control of hunting, fishing, trapping, and related activities remains with the State of Michigan. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Incineration in the Great Lakes Ecosystem |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United urges all levels of government in the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a comprehensive pollution prevention and clean production |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Promoting Sustainable Food System Support |
Therefore, be it resolved that Great Lakes United, wherever possible, source food and farm products locally, with a preference for organically grown products. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 10 2001 | Great Lakes United resolution |