Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Description Organization Date publishedsort icon Content Type
Asian Carp Prevention and Control Act sign on

The undersigned Great Lakes organizations are writing in strong support of bill H.R. 3049/ S.1402 the Asian Carp Prevention and Control Act. We support listing Asian carp (black, bighead and silver) as injurious under the Lacey Act and protecting the Great Lakes by closing a major loophole in the trade regime.

Alliance for the Great Lakes; Biodiversity Project ; Clean Water Action; Eastern Surfing Association - Great Lakes District; Environmental Advocates of New York; Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund; Great Lakes United; Illinois Council of Trout Unlimited; Izaak Walton League – Bush Lake Chapter; Izaak Walton League - Dwight Lydell Chapter; Izaak Walton League - Michigan Division; Izaak Walton League - Minnesota Division; Izaak Walton League - New York Division; Michigan United Conservation Clubs; National Wildlife Federation; Ohio Environmental Council; Nov 28 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Release: Bill axes funding for Asian carp barrier to continue six-year navigation study

Conservationists expressed outrage that a Congressional bill wouldcut funding to fight the influx of aquatic invasive species like the Asian carp, while extending a controversial and ongoing study on commercial shipping on the Great Lakes.

Great Lakes United, National Wildlife Federation Nov 10 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Opportunities for Better Controls of Invasive Species in the United States and Canada

This talk will look at untapped opportunities to catalyze change and prevent new
introductions of AIS by international commercial vessel transportation. It will identify approaches being actively pursued, as well as options just being debated. What they all have in common is that they are ways we can better prevent invasions. There are ways we can do more. And ultimately this talk intends to illustrate that we have substantially more authority to protect the Lakes than is currently being exercised.

Great Lakes United Nov 6 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Ballast Water Control and Management Regulations

The Great Lakes United coalition applauds efforts to amend the Shipping Act to better protect waters of the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence River, and the nation. We stress that such action has been strongly supported by the federal government in the “Government Response to the 4th Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans- Aquatic Invasive Species: Uninvited Guests”. In this response,
the government expressed support for the committee recommendation “that as a matter of priority, standards for the treatment of ballast water be developed, implemented and fully enforced” (Recommendation 6). We encourage the government to demonstrate support by immediately amending, implementing and enforcing changes to the Shipping Act that significantly increase protection of national waters from the ecologically and economically devastating impacts of aquatic invasive species originating from the ballast tanks.

Great Lakes United Aug 23 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Ocean shipping in the Great Lakes: Transportation cost increases that would result from a cessation of ocean vessel shipping Grand Valley State University Aug 1 2005 Report
Letter: National Aquatic Invasive Species Act of 2005

The undersigned Great Lakes organizations are writing to support the approach taken within the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act of 2005 (S. 770, H.R. 1591, H.R. 1592) and express concern with the Ballast Water Management Act of 2005 (S. 363). We applaud your ongoing commitment to finding a comprehensive federal solution to the problem of invasive species in the Great Lakes and nationwide. While state and regional actions against invasive species vectors are critical to establishing a fully protective framework, we believe a coordinated, comprehensive, and national approach is the preferred long-term means of stopping new invasive species from penetrating U.S. borders. We have also attached recommendations from the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration process to strengthen several aspects of these important bills.

Alliance for the Great Lakes; Biodiversity Project; Eastern Surfing Association; Environmental Advocates of New York; Great Lakes United; Illinois Council of Trout Unlimited; Michigan Environmental Council; Minnesota Conservation Federation; National Wildlife Federation; Ohio Environmental Council; Public Interest Research Group; Save the River; Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Jul 18 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Zero discharge of biological pollution in the Great Lakes from ballast water by 2011

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the United States Congress to immediately adopt legislation establishing regulations and programs to reduce ballast water discharge that are at least as stringent as the provisions of S. 770, the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act, as introduced in March 2005, which will set nationwide standards and develop technology and place it onboard ships to prevent
releases of non-native invasive species by 2011, which is the preferred national solution.

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2005 Great Lakes United resolution
Protect Great Lakes recharge areas, limit sprawl and keep the promise of Ontario’s Golden Horseshoe Greenbelt alive

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United calls on the Province of Ontario to take the necessary legal steps to defend the promise of the Golden Horseshoe Greenbelt, starting with actions to defend the “in perpetuity” easements to which it is a party, on the lands in the Duffins-Rouge Agricultural Preserve, and Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United calls on the Federal Government of Canada and its elected representatives, as parties to COA to make its concerns known to the Province of Ontario with respect to the pressures that are coming to bear on the lands in the Duffins-Rouge Agricultural Preserve.

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2005 Great Lakes United resolution
Improve United States and Canadian chemical policy by accepting the Louisville Charter as a binational mission statement

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the United States and Canadian governments to collaboratively adopt the key principles outlined in the Louisville Charter as an important step for chemicals policy in North America to protect the health of our communities and the environment.

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2005 Great Lakes United resolution
Opportunities for Better Controls of Invasive Species in the United States and Canada

Presented at the 2005 Great Lakes Conference and Biennial Meeting of the International Joint Commission

Kingston, Ontario

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2005 Conference proceedings
Sign on letter for the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act

The member organizations of the National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species (NECIS) urge you to co-sponsor the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act (NAISA), S. 770. NAISA will amend and improve the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990.

National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species Jun 6 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Comments on Ballast Water Management for Vessels Entering the Great Lakes That Declare No Ballast Onboard

I am writing on behalf of Great Lakes United to express our recommendations for the
improved regulation of ocean-going vessels declaring “no ballast on board” (NOBOB)
and the aquatic invasive species they carry. Great Lakes United is an international
coalition of over 170 environmental and conservation organizations, unions, academia and businesses in the United States, Canada, First Nations and tribes dedicated to the protection and restoration of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin ecosystem.

Great Lakes United May 6 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Release: On the eve of new shipping season, Great Lakes still unprotected from aquatic invasive species

On the eve of the opening of the St. Lawrence Seaway,
conservation groups are urging U.S. and Canadian governments to stop the introduction of aquatic non-native organisms into the lakes and to protect the region’s $4.5 billion world-class fishery.

Great Lakes United Mar 24 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Release: Loophole Plagues Invasive Species Program, Coast Guard Concedes

Press release calling for the U.S. Coast Guard to enforce the National Invasive Speices Act.

Great Lakes United, National Wildlife Federation Jan 18 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Extended Producer Responsibility: The Concept

An overview of extended producer responsibility.

Great Lakes United Jan 1 2005 Factsheet
Environmental Group Comments on the Proposed “Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Compact”

Comments on the Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Compact.

Great Lakes United Oct 18 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Environmental Group Comments on the Proposed International “Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement”

Comments on the Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement.

Great Lakes United Oct 18 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Canada and the “Annex” Water Agreements

The impact of the Annex agreements for Canada.

Great Lakes United Oct 9 2004 Factsheet
An opinion on the governors and premiers’ proposed “Annex Implementing Agreements”

Op-ed dispelling myths surround the Annex Agreements, and explaining why the agreements are a positive step forward for Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River protection.

Great Lakes United; National Wildlife Federation Sep 20 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Diversions and “Annex” Water Agreements

Background information on considerations for the development of the Annex agreements.

Great Lakes United Sep 10 2004 Factsheet
Protecting the Waters of the Great Lakes: The “Annex 2001” Process

Process and background on the Annex process to protect the Great Lakes from diversions.

Great Lakes United Sep 10 2004 Factsheet
Environmental Group Comments on the Proposed State-Provincial “Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement”

Comments on the Great Lakes Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement.

Great Lakes United Sep 7 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
The Nature Conservancy Comments on the Annex 2001 Draft Implementing Agreement

Comments by the Nature Conservancy on the Annex 2001 draft Implementing Agreement.

The Nature Conservancy Aug 30 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Denial of entry while in violation of mandatory Ballast Water Management reporting requirements

The Lake Michigan Federation (LMF) and Great Lakes United (GLU) hereby petition you, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act at 5 U.S.C.§553(e) and 33 CFR 1.05-20(a)(Petitions for Rulemaking), to reconsider your refusal, in the above cited regulation, to bar vessels from outside of U.S. waters from entry into the Great Lakes while they remain in violation of mandatory Ballast Water Management (BWM) reporting requirements. We urgently request that you issue a second correction to the Coast Guard’s new regulation that includes denial of entry to the Great Lakes as a penalty for violation of BWM reporting requirements before the new rules take effect on August 13, 2004.

Lake Michigan Federation, Great Lakes United Jul 22 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Great Lakes Charter Annex Implementing Agreements background, basics, and next steps

Primer on facts surround Great Lakes water use, and the development of Implementing Agreements.

Great Lakes United Jul 21 2004 Factsheet