Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Descriptionsort icon Organization Date published Content Type
Restoration of Coastal Brook Trout in Lake Superior

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United enthusiastically supports full rehabilitation and restoration of the native coaster brook trout in Lake Superior and its tributary waters;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That GLU calls upon all citizens of the Lake Superior Basin and especially on all of the state, provincial, First Nation, and tribal governments in the Basin to expeditiously take all of the necessary steps to assure that their respective fishery management agencies both can and do implement plans leading to the maximum possible rehabilitation and restoration of the native coaster brook trout to the waters and tributaries of Lake Superior;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it calls on the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and especially on its Lake Superior Committee to modify their Joint Strategic Plan, Fish Community Objectives and other policies to accommodate the maximum possible restoration of the native coaster brook trout to the waters and tributaries of Lake Superior;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it calls on the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and its Lake Huron and Lake Michigan Committees to evolve plans for the restoration of coaster brook trout in Lakes Huron and Michigan;

AND BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that it calls on the federal governments of the United States and Canada, especially their wildlife and environmental agencies, on public and private charitable foundations, and on North American private environmental and conservation organizations to support, to undertake and to provide resources for a broad initiative to conduct the research, to restore the habitat in and the hnctionality of rivers and coastal areas, to develop the restoration stocking capacity, and to implement the regulations that are necessary to rehabilitate and restore the stocks of the unique coaster brook trout to the waters of the Upper Great Lakes.

Great Lakes United Jun 13 1999 Great Lakes United resolution
US Federal Wetlands Legislation

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes HR 1330 and S 1463 and endorses HR 4255 as an important, fair legislative tool to halt further loss of wetlands in the US.; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United will communicate this position to all U.S. Senators and Representatives from Great Lakes states within the next month.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Limitations on Discharges of Toxics

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United work with a lead group in Michigan to obtain information about the Michigan proposal for control of toxics, identify issuee of concern, share this case study with interested persons in other states and provinces and provide back to the involved Michigan group(e) whatever assistance may be captured through Great Lakes United's efforts.

Great Lakes United May 13 1984 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following recommendations with respect to the Agreement, as well as such others as shall be developed by task forces of Great Lakes United, be brought to the attention of the International Joint Commission, the Governments of the United States and Canada, the Governors and Premiers of Great Lakes States and Provinces, members of Gongress and Parliament, the legislators of said states and provinces, and other interested parties.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT Great Lakes United reaffirms ite support of the policies of the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and opposes any weakening of the Agreement. Great Lakes United will continue to work towards increase public participation in the implementation and review of the Agreement and offers the following recommendations which apply to any opportunity to strengthen the Agreement by technical Amendment or other means:

1. The Parties ehould adopt an integrated approach to protecting both water quality and water quantity in the Great Lakee Basin.
2. The IJC strengthen its commitment to an ecosystem approach by developing specific programs to coneider the interactione between environrental components, ae well aa the effects of chemical and other contarinante on thoee interactions.
3. The existing Agreement's policies for the virtual elimination" and "zero discharge of persistent toxic subetancee ahould be retained in the Agreement, but they ehould be clarified.
4. The Great Lakes States and Provinces and non-government bodies should be urged to develop environmentally sound alternative methods for the disposal of hazardous waetes. Great Lakes United also encourages the Great Lakes states and provinces to follow the lead of New York State in implementing a phased reduction of the landfilling of hazardous organic waetes, as an initial step towards better policies that do not degrade the environmental quality of the Great Lakes Basin.
5. The IJC and the Parties enter into diecuesions for the purpose of including provisions to protect the Great Lakes Ecoeystem from any potentially adverse

Et Cetera.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Human Health Project

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Task Force takes into account that:

  • Human health is a key component for driving public policy for change; AND
  • The Task Force broadens the concept of human heah, taking lnto consideration such factors as employment, education, occupation, ethnlclty, race, gender and sexual preference; AND
  • Is essential that the project have representation within the community; AND
  • The Task Force recognizes all Great Lakes citizens as exposed populations; AND
  • The proposal include funding to enable the Task Force to provlde basinwide community direction to the project.
Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include , but are not limited to:

(1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
(2) BPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Isle, Michigan;
(3) Great Lakea research programs funded through the United States Commerce Department'e Sea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region; and
(4) Great Lakes research program funded through the U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of Great Lakes

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to:

(1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
(2) EPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Ile, Michigan;
(3) Great Lakes research programs funded through the United States Commerce Department's Sea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region;
(4) Great Lakes research programs funded through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and
(5) NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of Great Lakes Research Laboratories

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research rograms because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to:

(1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
(2) EPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Ile, Michigan;
(3) Great Lakes research pro rams funded through the United States Commerce De artment's ea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region ocused on restoring environmental quality;
(4) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Fisheries Center - Great Lakes, Ann Arbor, Michigan; AND
(5) NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act; AND

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Public Hearings

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges its member organizations to take an active role in the hearing(s) nearest them. Member organizations are urged to use the hearings and the accompanying hot-spot tours to:
1) Help present our case to the governments that we need a strong Agreement to attack toxics and clean up Areas of concern.
2) Help build a popular and political constituency to defend the Agreement from being weakened and/or dismantled.
3) Increase public awareness of the severity of problems in Areas of Concern.
4) Develop a renewed commitment of citizens and governments to full implementation of the Agreement's policy and objectives, specifically the elimination of discharges of toxic subtances.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Requesting Indiana Join in Funding the Great Lakes Protection Fund

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, be It resolved by the delegates assembled for the 10th Annual Meeting of Great Lakes United (GLU) request the State of Indiana to contribute to the Great Lakes Protection Fund.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Calling for the Passage of the United States Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Reform Act

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes legislation is needed to strengthen and revise the Occupational Safety and Heallh Act; AND

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the prompt passage of the Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Reform Act (S. 1622, H.R. 3160).

AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Congress appropriate and allocate adequate funding to fully implement all aspects of the Reform legislation.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Use of Risk Assessment for Regulating Carinogens

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United does not endorse the principle of quantitative risk assessment as the sole basis for eetabliahing environmental standards for carcinogens;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United also recognizes that the quantitative evaluation of data may be useful in sore circumstances, such as the prioritization of environmentally significant chemicals;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourages the development of alternative rethoda to set environrental standards for carcinogens, such as goals of non-detectable discharges and lowest achievable discharge linite, using Best Available Technology, where they prove to be more protective to human health and the environment;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourages the State, Provincial and Federal government and the IJC to coordinate the development of standards and guidelines consistent with the principles articulated in the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement or any revised agreement.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great LakeS United encourages the State, Provincial and Federal governments as well as industries that discharge wates into the Great Lakes, to expand their efforts to curtail the pollution of the Great Lakes by examing source reduction and source elimination technologies, and any other environmentally sound alternatives for waste disposal.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Diversions

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its opposition to any out-of-basin diversion, AND

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United specifically oppcses the Lowell, IN diversion.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Protection Fund

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the concept of the states establishing a fund to provide additional, stable, long term financing of Great Lakes research, monitoring and clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Great Lakes Governors and a steering committee of the Great Lakes Protection Fund to provide for environmental group and public representation on the steering committee, the Board of Trustees and on all other entities created to oversee or administer the Fund; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that this endowment fund not be invested in corporations or municipalities or bond issues of those entities who have a record of violations of environmental laws; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that contributions to the Fund and disbursements from it should supplement and not replace direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activites, and that such fudning be consistent with the "polluter pays" principle as adopted by Canada and the Unisted States as members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Governors should agree to perform and make public an annual audit of each state's spending on Great Lakes research, monitoring, and clean-up activities, including the expenditure of federal grant funds, so as to demonstrate that contributions to or from the Fund are not replacing direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the governing body of the Fund with the advice of policymakers throughout the basin should establish clear priorities as to the types of projects eligible for funding and that, within those priority categories, funding decisions should be made exclusively on their scientific merit; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the participation of Ontario and Quebec in the Fund or the establishment of a companion fund in Ontario and Quebec; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that all research, literature review leading to that research, and monitoring data be made readily available to the public.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes United and Native American Fishing Policy on Enforcement of the 1985 Great Lakes Agreement

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU will use its association with Native Americans to initiate discussions between Native Americans and sport angling groups relative to:

1) court-ordered fishing agreements reached between Native Americans and states and sport angling groups in the Great Lakes Basin,
2) noncompliance with these court-ordered agreements
3) consideration of the impacts of this noncompliance on fish stocks, wildlife and public safety; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU will take an active role in the upcoming renegotiation of the 1985 Consent Agreement, particularly with respect to strengthening provisions related to management, enforcement and arbitration; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU will formally adopt the position that gill nets should ultimately be replaced by selective harvest gear as appropriate; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU member organizations be apprised of GLU's actions, and results of same, relative to this critical natural resource issue.

Great Lakes United May 5 1994 Great Lakes United resolution
Release: On the eve of new shipping season, Great Lakes still unprotected from aquatic invasive species

On the eve of the opening of the St. Lawrence Seaway,
conservation groups are urging U.S. and Canadian governments to stop the introduction of aquatic non-native organisms into the lakes and to protect the region’s $4.5 billion world-class fishery.

Great Lakes United Mar 24 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
NECIS Position Statement: Reducing Introductions of invasive species

Position Statement: Reducing Introductions of Invasive Species

The Problem: Continued Introductions of Damaging Species

 

Multiple Letter, comment, or government submissions
NAISA Postcards

Postcards in support of the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act

Great Lakes United Letter, comment, or government submissions
Preliminary Comments and Recommendations on Governance Issues for Consideration During the 2010 Renegotiation of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

Preliminary comments and recommendations on governance matters. Increasingly, those involved in Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) matters assert that one of the prime reasons for our failure to achieve more under the GLWQA is the flawed nature and functioning of government institutions and processes around the Agreement.

Multiple Feb 15 2010 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Victory! Great Lakes- St. Lawrence River Navigation Study takes a 180!

Presentation material from the Navigation webinar that took place on August 2, 2011 at 12:00pm EDT.  

Save the River Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint)
Construction of New Nuclear Reactors at Darlington Generating Station

Presentation regarding the construction of new nuclear reactors at Darlington Generating Station.

Northwatch, Greenpeace Dec 1 2010 Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint)
Opportunities for Better Controls of Invasive Species in the United States and Canada

Presented at the 2005 Great Lakes Conference and Biennial Meeting of the International Joint Commission

Kingston, Ontario

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2005 Conference proceedings
Release: Loophole Plagues Invasive Species Program, Coast Guard Concedes

Press release calling for the U.S. Coast Guard to enforce the National Invasive Speices Act.

Great Lakes United, National Wildlife Federation Jan 18 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Letter to U.S. Secretary of State Clinton - Asian carp

Request on behalf of the Great Lakes United, Environmental Defence Canada, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Silver Valley Waterkeeper (Indiana),Grand Traverse Baykeeper, St. Clair Channelkeeper, Detroit Riverkeeper, Western Lake ErieWaterkeeper, Lake Ontario Waterkeeper, Georgian Baykeeper, Ottawa Riverkeeper, Fraser Riverkeeper, Fundy Baykeeper and Grand Riverkeeper Labrador to the U.S. Secretary of State and to the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency concerning s. 310 of the Clean Water Act regarding the need for urgent action to address the threat of migration of Asian bighead, silver, grass and black carp into the Great Lakes.

Mulitple Letter, comment, or government submissions
Great Lakes United Resolution Summaries 1983 - 1987

Resolution Summaries topcis are Air Pollution, Fallout, Water Quality, Hazardous Waste, Toxic Substances, Water Levels, Water Flow, Diversions, Navigation, Fish Health, Wildlife Health, Habitat Health, Land Use, Energy Distribution, Energy Development, and Education.

Great Lakes United May 5 1987 Great Lakes United resolution