Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Titlesort icon Description Organization Date published Content Type
Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Islands and Shoals

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United call on State and Provincial jurisdictions to call for a moratorium on further development of Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River islands until a scientific inventory of lslands and shoals and a plannlng vision are completed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU request the U.S. and Canadian Nature Conservancies, the Center for the Great Lakes and local land trusts to pursue a protective strategy towards islands and shoals basin-wide, and that such private not-for-profits in conjunction with governments further promulgate an approach to development that protects the natural resources, open space, and scenic and heritage value of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Antidegreadation Policy

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the inclusion of strong antidegradation procedures as part of the U.S. EPA's Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative. The antidegradation policies and procedures should be used to move expeditiously to zero discharge of persistent toxic substances. Such policies should be implemented in conjunction with efforts such as Lakewide Management Plans and Remedial Action Plans that set clear targets for reducing total loadings of persistent toxic chemicals in regular, enforceable steps to zero. Antidegradation review should triggered not only by proposed or actual increases above current discharges, but should be also triggered by increases above target load allocations derived from load reduction plans thereby assuring steady progress to zero discharge; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United proposes that Great Lakes antidegradation policy be implemented in such a way that:

1. any exception to antidegradation prohibitions be treated as "variances" so that decisions about proposed exceptions are made in a public forum,
2. such exceptions be allowed only after the discharger requesting exception satisfies the following hierarchy of legally enforceable requirements:
a) that the discharger has implemented a waste reduction program using the best available waste reduction/pollution prevention techniques,
b) that the discharger can prove that no environmental damage will occur and that the proof is corroborated by independent experts.
c) that economic and social factors shall not be considered reasons for variances.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Diversions

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its opposition to any out-of-basin diversion, AND

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United specifically oppcses the Lowell, IN diversion.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes navigation system review

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Canadian Autoworkers recommends to Transport Canada that the goals of the supplement to the reconnaissance study be to: Examine the engineering needs and costs associated with maintaining the benefit of domestic shipping and jobs to the regional economy, and examine the economic justification of continued access by foreign ships to the Great Lakes basin.

Great Lakes United Dec 31 2003 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Protection Fund

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the concept of the states establishing a fund to provide additional, stable, long term financing of Great Lakes research, monitoring and clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Great Lakes Governors and a steering committee of the Great Lakes Protection Fund to provide for environmental group and public representation on the steering committee, the Board of Trustees and on all other entities created to oversee or administer the Fund; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that this endowment fund not be invested in corporations or municipalities or bond issues of those entities who have a record of violations of environmental laws; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that contributions to the Fund and disbursements from it should supplement and not replace direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activites, and that such fudning be consistent with the "polluter pays" principle as adopted by Canada and the Unisted States as members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Governors should agree to perform and make public an annual audit of each state's spending on Great Lakes research, monitoring, and clean-up activities, including the expenditure of federal grant funds, so as to demonstrate that contributions to or from the Fund are not replacing direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the governing body of the Fund with the advice of policymakers throughout the basin should establish clear priorities as to the types of projects eligible for funding and that, within those priority categories, funding decisions should be made exclusively on their scientific merit; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the participation of Ontario and Quebec in the Fund or the establishment of a companion fund in Ontario and Quebec; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that all research, literature review leading to that research, and monitoring data be made readily available to the public.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Protection Fund

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges participating states and provinces to create independent Great Lakes Protection Fund citizen technical advisory boards comprised of public members; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these citizen technical boards shall advise their representatives on the regional board of directors of the Great Lakes Protection Fund and consult with the regional technical advisory committee of the Great Lakes Protection Fund.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Toxic Agreements

THBREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United supports promulgation and implementation of the Greet Lakee Toxic Substances Control Agreement;

BE IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement in the implementation and review of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement is essential to the control of toxic pollutants entering the Great Lakes System;

BB IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement is the design of any Basin-wide agreement including, at a minimum, consultation and responce as provided for in the agreement, is essential to the control of toxic pollutants; and

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that the success of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement in controlling the entry of toxic pollutants into the Great Lakes system is dependent upon continuing public involvement.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes United and Native American Fishing Policy on Enforcement of the 1985 Great Lakes Agreement

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU will use its association with Native Americans to initiate discussions between Native Americans and sport angling groups relative to:

1) court-ordered fishing agreements reached between Native Americans and states and sport angling groups in the Great Lakes Basin,
2) noncompliance with these court-ordered agreements
3) consideration of the impacts of this noncompliance on fish stocks, wildlife and public safety; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU will take an active role in the upcoming renegotiation of the 1985 Consent Agreement, particularly with respect to strengthening provisions related to management, enforcement and arbitration; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU will formally adopt the position that gill nets should ultimately be replaced by selective harvest gear as appropriate; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU member organizations be apprised of GLU's actions, and results of same, relative to this critical natural resource issue.

Great Lakes United May 5 1994 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes United Participation During Lake Level Reference at IJC Binational Meeting

BE IT RESOLVED THAT, at the October 14, 1989 International Joint Commission Binational meeting during their deliberations regarding the Lake Level Reference, Great Lakes United request to make a presentation at that session and that the organization and member organizations be involved in other possible avenues of participation;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that through that participation, Great Lakes United advocate an ecosystem approach to lake level management issues and emphasize its historic resolutions on lake levels, specifically policies opposing any new or increased diversions out of or into the Great Lakes Basin, and GLU I987 Policy Resolution made in Niagara Falls, Ontario recognizing natural lake level fluctuations and ecologically sound approaches to their impacts.

Great Lakes United Oct 14 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes United Resolution Summaries 1983 - 1987

Resolution Summaries topcis are Air Pollution, Fallout, Water Quality, Hazardous Waste, Toxic Substances, Water Levels, Water Flow, Diversions, Navigation, Fish Health, Wildlife Health, Habitat Health, Land Use, Energy Distribution, Energy Development, and Education.

Great Lakes United May 5 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes United Taskforce on Labour and the Environment

THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED place a high and immediate priority on obtaining new funding to support the work of the Labor/Enviranment Task Force, with the objective of supporting paid staff time and providing other necessary resources; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will introduce and promote the principle of worker compensation and economic protection as well as other options in all its pollution
prevention policies and initiatives; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the GREAT LAKES UNITED'S Taskforce on Labour and the Environment will take responsibi1ity for reviewing and evaluating current worker protection and compensation programs as they exist in the Great Lakes Basin with the future task of providing further policy recommendations to the Board as required.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Conservation Plan

Therefore be it resolved that the Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Management Committee established by the Great Lakes Charter draft a Great Lakes water conservation plan within the next year, and

Be it further resolved that this plan require the states and provinces to review and map all drinking water supplies for their quality and long-term sustainability, and

Be it further resolved that user pay principles be the foundation of this water conservation plan and uniform efficiency standards be developed for all sectors of society that use lake and/or groundwater supplies within the Basin watershed, and

Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United seek funding to hold a workshop for members to explore ways to advocate for local water conservation programs and to explore the need of such programs for the sustainability of the Great Lakes.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Initiative

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, where the current effluent level of a discharge is below the permitted level for a particular parameter, any permit reissued shall require the current discharge level to be the new permitted level; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the wildlife criteria shall be designed to protect the most ecologically sensitive species; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the human health criteria shall be designed to protect high risk populations, including heavy consumers of fish and sensitive groups such as newborns and the elderly; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, as part of the implementation procedures, any permit which regulates discharges of bioaccumulative, persistent compounds shall include a sunset provision to phase out the use of the compound; therefore achieving zero discharge; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, any new or reissued permit must include a pollution prevention plan developed by the discharger and approved by the permitting agency; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, all aquatic, wildlife and human criteria shall be expanded to include protection from reproductive, neurological, and other non-cancer effects.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Levels and Diversions I

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support legislative and administrative proposals which recognize the natural fluctuation of lake levels and, address long-term solutions to lake level problems including improved coastal zone management practices, establishment of flood sensitive zones, restrictions on building on barrier island and flood sensitive zones, utilization of environmentally sound shoreline protection devices and a better understanding of the flow-thru rates from one lake to another.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support one-time federal emergency assistance to Great Lakes shoreline property owners for the necessary financial resources to relocate families, set-back structures and/or buy out existing properties for public use.

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United continues to oppose any increased diversions into or out of the Great Lakes Basin and promotes a regional water management and data collection system that implements the intent of the Great Lakes Charter.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Levels Flows and Diversions II

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition the government of Ontario to reverse its decision not to designate this project and to formally designate this project under the Environmental  Assessment Act or to establish a commission under Public Inquiries Act to suspend approvals process and to report within 60 days.

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United work with the Friends of the Magpie River to ensure these environmental concerns are addressed and no increased diversion are permitted into the Great Lakes Basin.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following recommendations with respect to the Agreement, as well as such others as shall be developed by task forces of Great Lakes United, be brought to the attention of the International Joint Commission, the Governments of the United States and Canada, the Governors and Premiers of Great Lakes States and Provinces, members of Gongress and Parliament, the legislators of said states and provinces, and other interested parties.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT Great Lakes United reaffirms ite support of the policies of the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and opposes any weakening of the Agreement. Great Lakes United will continue to work towards increase public participation in the implementation and review of the Agreement and offers the following recommendations which apply to any opportunity to strengthen the Agreement by technical Amendment or other means:

1. The Parties ehould adopt an integrated approach to protecting both water quality and water quantity in the Great Lakee Basin.
2. The IJC strengthen its commitment to an ecosystem approach by developing specific programs to coneider the interactione between environrental components, ae well aa the effects of chemical and other contarinante on thoee interactions.
3. The existing Agreement's policies for the virtual elimination" and "zero discharge of persistent toxic subetancee ahould be retained in the Agreement, but they ehould be clarified.
4. The Great Lakes States and Provinces and non-government bodies should be urged to develop environmentally sound alternative methods for the disposal of hazardous waetes. Great Lakes United also encourages the Great Lakes states and provinces to follow the lead of New York State in implementing a phased reduction of the landfilling of hazardous organic waetes, as an initial step towards better policies that do not degrade the environmental quality of the Great Lakes Basin.
5. The IJC and the Parties enter into diecuesions for the purpose of including provisions to protect the Great Lakes Ecoeystem from any potentially adverse

Et Cetera.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United formally endorses the recommendations in Unfulfilled Promises; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United member organizations develop an implementation strategy for the findin s of Unfulfilled Promises, and promote adequate public participation in review o f the Agreement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU focus priority attention on the virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances and zero discharge. The Water Quality Task Force, in cooperation with member groups and staff, shall develop a definition of zero discharge, suggest alternatives for persistent toxic substances and develop an action plan to advocate the changes. GLU also advocates the inclusion in any amended GLWQA of a commitment by the two countries to develop timetables to achieve virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances in the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the implementation of zero discharge goals through state and provincial legislative/regulatory initiatives such as the proposed Safe Drinking ater Act in New Yor state; AND

FINALLY BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these state/provincial initiatives have estabfished timetables for implementation.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Public Hearings

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges its member organizations to take an active role in the hearing(s) nearest them. Member organizations are urged to use the hearings and the accompanying hot-spot tours to:
1) Help present our case to the governments that we need a strong Agreement to attack toxics and clean up Areas of concern.
2) Help build a popular and political constituency to defend the Agreement from being weakened and/or dismantled.
3) Increase public awareness of the severity of problems in Areas of Concern.
4) Develop a renewed commitment of citizens and governments to full implementation of the Agreement's policy and objectives, specifically the elimination of discharges of toxic subtances.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United, at its 1994 meeting in Buffalo, New York, reaffirms its support for a strong Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative, as expressed in comments of September 13, 1993, to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United believes that the GLI must be adopted and implemented on a consisknt basis throughout the eight Great Lakes States as binding regualation, not voluntary guidance, and the final rules should be made stronger than the draft proposal, not weaker; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls upon New York Governor Mario Cuomo and his fellow Governors of the Great Lakes States to maintain support for a strong GLI, and to allow U.S. EPA to complete its work finalizing the GLI without political interference; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes any legislative amendment to weaken the GLI.

Great Lakes United May 5 1994 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Week

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United encourages the development of educational programs concerned with environmental issues. The organization urges its members to work on programs in their own localities, particularly for Great Lakes Week. Great Lakes United further recommends that the programs for Great Lakes Week be geared to attract a wider audience by including topics relating to environment (historical, recreational, etc,).

Great Lakes United May 13 1984 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Week

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United charge the Board of Directors to continue to designate a week to be called "Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Week" (GLW) for the purpose of educating citizens about the basin's hietory, ecology, and resource management issues; and to focus attention upon the Great Lakes ecoeyetem; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that since GLW encompasses all the educational goals of Great Lakes United, it should become a plenary seesion agenda item at the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting for ae long as Great Lakes United continues to proclaim Great Lakes Week; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that sember organizations of Great Lakes United take a coordinating role in organizing events for euch a week in their respective communities; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each Great Lakes United region designate a repreeentative to coordinate activities within their own region; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in order for a region to designate a GLW representative, Great Lakes regions of Great Lakes United need to meet to deeignate a representative; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Week Task Force of Great Lakes United designate individuals to obtain proclamations of each a week by Governors, Premiers, the President, the Prime Ministers and legislative bodies throughout the Great Lakes Basin; and

Et Cetera

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Wetlands

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a new Annex specifically addressing wetlands losses and their effects on the integrity of the Great Lakes ecosystem be added to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement at its next revision; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for the wetland base in the Great Lakes Basin to be restored, the U,S, and Canadian federal governments should immediately declare the Great Lakes Basin a "demonstration region" for a "Net Gain" in wetland functions and quantity.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Zebra Mussel Research

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United, at its 1994 annual meeting in Buffalo, New York, petition Congress to restore full funding provided by the Non-Indigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to ensure the completion of current research programs designed to develop strategies to understand, deal with, and perhaps reduce the econornidecological impacts of the zebra mussel, AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United call upon all its member organizations to write their Congresspersons and members of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees urging them to support the restoration of full funding for zebra,mussel research in the Great Lakes.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1994 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Zebra Quagga Mussel Research

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United petitions Congress to restore full funding provided by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to ensure the completion of current research programs designed to develop strategies to understand, deal with, and perhaps reduce the economic and ecological impacts of nonindigenous aquatic nuisance species such as zebra mussels and sea lamprey, and

Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United call upon all its member organizations to write their state congresspersons and members of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees urging them to support the restoration of full funding for zebra mussel research in the Great Lakes.

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the Canadian federal through the agencies of Fisheries and Oceans in cooperation with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and the Quebec Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food to pursue research on the impacts of these exotic species.

Great Lakes United May 5 1993 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Legacy Natural Heritage Areas Program

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will work to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy Program to preserve natural areas as reservoirs of biodiversity and protect the best examples of biodiversity in aquatic and terrestrial sites located in pristine or restored areas of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU strongly urges the Council of Great Lakes Governors to provide regional political leadership necessary to establish and implement the Great Legacy program, a Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin-wide biodiversity conservation strategy; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU urges the states and provinces in the Great Lakes Basin as well as local units of government to take expeditious and appropriate steps to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy program;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be conveyed to the Governors and Premlers of the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Basin and the office of the Council of Great Lakes Governors.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution