Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Description Organization Date publishedsort icon Content Type
Preservation of Strawberry Island

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakea United provide expertise and assistance to achieve the goals of erosion control, future State ownerahip and long-term management.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourage the Federal Governmental Agencies, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and the New York Department of Parka and Recreation to apply ecologically aound methods to control erosion and to further enhance the recreational, fisheries and other natural benefits of the island.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Permanent Solution to Toxic Landfills

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United calls upon the Environrental Protection Agency to replace their general policy for remedial action at abondoned hazardous waste sites in the Great Lakes Basin with a policy which emphasises permanent solutions to these problems through:
1. source removal of mobile wamtes in an environmentally sound and humanly safe manner using Best Available Technology,
2. clean-up technologies and remedial alternatives that lead to effective waste destruction employing Best Available Technology.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Superfund Authorization

THERBFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United calls upon Congress to reauthorize C.E.R.C.L.A.; and

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United call upon Congress to enact a CERCLA bill that is no less stringent than the original bill passed by the House in December 1985 including, if necessary, recommittal of that bill; and

THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RBSOLVED THAT, Congress adequately fund the Superfund program with no less than $10.1 billion; and

THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHBR RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges Congress to require EPA to address the problems of improper disposal and management of hazardous waste and protection of groundwater by the uae of safe, new and innovative technology as alternativee to land disposal.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Levels and Flows I

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TEAT, Great Lakes United undertake a comprehensive collation of data and information on the proposed structural and land use options and review the risks of each so that we may better evaluate our future ections. Where there is a lack of information
we will seek to petition the appropriate agenciee to undertake further studies.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Level and Flows II
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United reaffirm support for detailed aaseaament of current water use so ae to better approach defense of Great Lakes United opposition to diveraions and further to affirm Great Lakes United's goal af developing a legal defense against diversion;
 
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United seek the means to fund the necessary legal research and intervention.
Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Year After Great Lakes Charter

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1986 Annual Meeting of Great Lakes United formally endoraea the document and the following seven-point program recoamendations:

1. Each state and province should formally incorporate a water registration system for all users of Great Lakes waters. This mandatory registration system should include amounts of water returned to the Great Lakes system and in what quality. In addition, this system should not be used to legitimize existing diversion. We should not accept thie registration system as a basis for "grand-fathering" all existing diversions and consumptive uses.

2. Establish present consumptive use needs in the basin based on the registration data and develop projected future consumptive use needs under a variety of economic growth scenarios. This must be coordinated with the establishment of a data base that understand the quantity and quality of water available to the Great Lakes Basin.

3. Detailed analysis of the environmental, social and economic impacts of water diversion, and incorporate those findings into a Public Health and Welfare case. Economic impacts could only be incorporated as they relate to the health and welfare of the citizenry, to avoid economic protectionism as in the El Paso case.

4. Advocate water conservation/improvement programe within and outside the Great Lakes Basin.

5. Develop state and provincial prohibitive diversion legislation based on the Public Health and Welfare case.

6. Great Lakes jurisdicitions would defend the legislative ban on diversion of Great Lakes water out of the basin in courts based on the Public Health and Welfare case. If the legal case was loat, Great Lakes jurisdictions could then incorporate a permitting system for
water withdrawals.

7. Great Lakes jurisdictions would work with national and-international leaders to develop and implement anti-diversion legislation and agreement 8.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Run-Off Resolution

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United encourages the use of theee known and innovative techniques to clean and keep clean the waters of the Qreat Lakes. We specifically applaud the Sod Buster and Swanp Bueter provisions of the new Agriculture Bill and stream restoration techniquea being initiated by state and federe1 natural reesource agencies.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Reauthorizating the US Clean Water Act

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urge the Conference Committee Members to move at once to approve a strong and comprehensive Clean Water Act and calle upon the Great Lakes Congressional Delegetes to urge the Conference Committee to avoid further delays in completing its work on the Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Designating the Great Lakes as Outstanding National Resource Waters

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United at its Annual Meeting in Mackinaw City on May 16-18, 1986, commends Governor lllenchard and the Michigan Water Remources Commission for proposing to classify Michigan's waters of the Great Lakes as "outstanding national resource waters" for purposes'of U.S. EPA's water quality standards regulations;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon Governor Blanchard and the Michigan Water Resources Commission to eliminate the exception in proposed rule 1098(3) which would allow new or increased pollutant diacharges into the connecting channels or tributaries of the Great Lakes within Michigan's boundaries even if these discharges adversely affect Great Lakes water quality;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Michigan Water Resourcee Commission immediately to promulgate proposed rule 1098 designating Michigan's waters of the Great Lakes as "outstanding national resource waters," mended as suggested herein, as a revision to Michigan's water quality standards;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the other Great Lakes states immediately to revise their water quality standards to classify the open waters of the Great Lakes located within their boundaries as "outstanding national resource waters" for purposes of the U.S. BPA's water quality standard regulations.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following recommendations with respect to the Agreement, as well as such others as shall be developed by task forces of Great Lakes United, be brought to the attention of the International Joint Commission, the Governments of the United States and Canada, the Governors and Premiers of Great Lakes States and Provinces, members of Gongress and Parliament, the legislators of said states and provinces, and other interested parties.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT Great Lakes United reaffirms ite support of the policies of the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and opposes any weakening of the Agreement. Great Lakes United will continue to work towards increase public participation in the implementation and review of the Agreement and offers the following recommendations which apply to any opportunity to strengthen the Agreement by technical Amendment or other means:

1. The Parties ehould adopt an integrated approach to protecting both water quality and water quantity in the Great Lakee Basin.
2. The IJC strengthen its commitment to an ecosystem approach by developing specific programs to coneider the interactione between environrental components, ae well aa the effects of chemical and other contarinante on thoee interactions.
3. The existing Agreement's policies for the virtual elimination" and "zero discharge of persistent toxic subetancee ahould be retained in the Agreement, but they ehould be clarified.
4. The Great Lakes States and Provinces and non-government bodies should be urged to develop environmentally sound alternative methods for the disposal of hazardous waetes. Great Lakes United also encourages the Great Lakes states and provinces to follow the lead of New York State in implementing a phased reduction of the landfilling of hazardous organic waetes, as an initial step towards better policies that do not degrade the environmental quality of the Great Lakes Basin.
5. The IJC and the Parties enter into diecuesions for the purpose of including provisions to protect the Great Lakes Ecoeystem from any potentially adverse

Et Cetera.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Public Hearings

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges its member organizations to take an active role in the hearing(s) nearest them. Member organizations are urged to use the hearings and the accompanying hot-spot tours to:
1) Help present our case to the governments that we need a strong Agreement to attack toxics and clean up Areas of concern.
2) Help build a popular and political constituency to defend the Agreement from being weakened and/or dismantled.
3) Increase public awareness of the severity of problems in Areas of Concern.
4) Develop a renewed commitment of citizens and governments to full implementation of the Agreement's policy and objectives, specifically the elimination of discharges of toxic subtances.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include , but are not limited to:

(1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
(2) BPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Isle, Michigan;
(3) Great Lakea research programs funded through the United States Commerce Department'e Sea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region; and
(4) Great Lakes research program funded through the U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Adequate Enforcement and Implementation of Environmental Laws

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United work work with its member organizations at the state, provincial and national levels to:

1. assess and analyze the staffing and funding needs of state, national and international programs that should operate to protect the Great Lakes from pollution and mismanagement,
2. assess and analyze the degree to which those staffing and funding neede are being met, and the causes of any deficiencies that are discovered,
3. publicize deficiencies and advocate in appropriate forums for adequate staffing and funding. Great Lakes United should work to establish funding mechaniams with long-term stability, such as those derived from surveillance and monitoring fees assessed as part of the permitting procedure,
4. insure that environmental agencies and attorney generale' offices aggressively pursue enforcement actions against violaters of environmental statutes and regulations affecting the Great Lakes,
5. advocate the inclusions of broad citizen suit sections in state, provincial and national environmental statutes, which will allow citizens to serve as "private attorney generals," supplementing governmental enforcement efforts.

Great Lakes United May 5 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Week

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United charge the Board of Directors to continue to designate a week to be called "Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Week" (GLW) for the purpose of educating citizens about the basin's hietory, ecology, and resource management issues; and to focus attention upon the Great Lakes ecoeyetem; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that since GLW encompasses all the educational goals of Great Lakes United, it should become a plenary seesion agenda item at the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting for ae long as Great Lakes United continues to proclaim Great Lakes Week; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that sember organizations of Great Lakes United take a coordinating role in organizing events for euch a week in their respective communities; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each Great Lakes United region designate a repreeentative to coordinate activities within their own region; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in order for a region to designate a GLW representative, Great Lakes regions of Great Lakes United need to meet to deeignate a representative; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Week Task Force of Great Lakes United designate individuals to obtain proclamations of each a week by Governors, Premiers, the President, the Prime Ministers and legislative bodies throughout the Great Lakes Basin; and

Et Cetera

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
TOXIC AIR POLLUTION AND ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION TO THE GREAT LAXES BASIN

THBREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United, assembled in annual meeting of Way 17-19, 1985, in Chicago, Illinois, endorses and urges immediate implementation of "A Proposal for a Program to Study Atmospheric Loading of Toxic Chemicals to the Great Lakes: Report to Great
Lakes Environmental Administration, August 1984; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports necessary federal, state-and provincial f.unding needed to achieve the proposal's recommendations for monitoring, research on gaseous and dry deposition sampling, and pollution source inventories.

SPECIFICALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United endorses:
Et Cetera.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste Transport in the Great Lakes Basin

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United actively promote new federal, state, provincial and local regulations to suspend the transportation of high level nuclear waste within the Great Lakes Basin until such a time that the above concerns are fully addressed and the safe transport of the fuel can be assured.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE B6 IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United urge the U.S. Department of Energy and Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. that any potential sites for nuclear waste repositories in the Qreat Lakes/St. Lawrence watershed be immediately disqualified from any further consideration for such use, and furthermore, future plans for nuclear waste repositories must consider the magnitude and ecologic seneitivity of the hydrological features of the location being reviewed.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetlands Protection

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United:

- opposes any attempts to reduce the scope of the Section 404 program or the protections now given wetlands by the U.S. EPAss 404(b) (1) Guidelines;
- supports reforms of existing federal farm programe to remove subsidies for production of taurplua crops on wetlande drained and cleared after 1981;
- recommends the elimination of federal, state, and provincial tax incentives for draining and clearing of wetlande.

 

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Right to Know

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that strong right-to-know legislation be enacted that:

  • requires each chemical container be labeled indicating the precise chemical name of the ingredients;
  • requires total annual estimates of quantities of toxic/hazardous materials or substances emitted, discharged, or disposed from a facility and total estimates of materials or substances stored or used at the facility;
  • prohibits "trade secrets" from being used ae an excuse to deny workers, community, and union representatives access to information;
  • requires that chemical manufacturer's supply and that employers maintain safety data sheets for all hazardous substances used or stored in the workplace and that employere make these sheets available to workers and the public;
  • requires workers be trained in safety procedures when using toxic and hazardous chemicals, be inforred of their health effects and have the right to refuse to work with chemicals if employers fail to provide safety information; and
  • requires facilities to notify residents and officials of communities where plants are located, of the materiels emitted, discharged, disposed from or used/stored at each facility.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that employers should be prohibited from disciplining, diacharging or discriminating against workers who exercise right-to-know rights when implemented into law or files a complaint against their employer.

THERBFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Federal, State and Local agencies responsible for the enforcement of the above provisions, implement meaningful penalties against employers who repeatedly violate right-to-know legislation.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Ohio River Canal Study Proposal in Congress

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes B.R. 1519 or any such legislation to fund the atudy of a Lake Erie-Ohio River Canal Project; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is inappropriate to fund studies on far-reaching projecta inconsistent with the Great Lakes Charter when other federal qualitative and quantitative research prograre for the Greet Lakes Basin are being crippled in the Halls of Congrees.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Implementation of the Great Lakes Charter

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United re-affirms its opposition to any new diversions out of or into the Great Lakes Basin; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on provincial and state governmenta to demonstrate a commitment to implementing the Great Lakes' Charter through

  • funding and staff assignments
  • data collection on levels, flows, and consumptive uses of Great Lakes water,
  • incorporation of the Charter's principles into all provincial and state laws and government consideration of diversions into or out of the Great Lakes Basin, and
  • adoption of any new state and provincial laws needed to implement the Charter; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on its members to bring their elected public officials to account for any proposal they support which could increase chances for inter-basin diversion of Great Lakes waters, and requeat their public officials to define their commitment to implementing the Great Lakes Charter.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Navigation on the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence River Waterway System

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes United navigation task force should be broadened and continue its work for the purpose of:

(1) investigating the critical issues which have been advanced in the position paper and any others which may arise; and

(2) work along with Great Lakes United members in the development and refining of an action strategy for implementation of Great Lakes United resolutions on commercial navigation; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United Navigation's Task Force-promote the following recommendations:

The establishment of uniform and coordinated regulatory standards and rules governing commercial navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System which takes the unique environmental, 'social, climatic, economic conditions of the Basin into account. Elements to be coneidered in these uniform regulatory initiatives are:

1. limitation of hazardous goods transported on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System to ice free and good weather conditions;

2. and in some instances, completely banning the transportation of some kinds of hazardous material, such as radiotoxic material;

3. the enactment of provisions which would impart absolute liability for carriers and shippers of hazardous materials;

4 . the application of stringent safety requirements (which would equal thoee most stringent standards now existing in the basin);

5. the mandatory development of proven containment and clean-up provisions and mechanisms

6. the creation of coordinated mechanisms to ensure the proper monitoring and enforcement of the uniform regulations between Canada and the U.S

7. further research ott the ecological and human health effects of various substances and materials and the working toward a more specific and uniform definition of "hazardous" and "dangerous" material.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Proposed Sault St. Marie Lock

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes that no justification exists to spend $226.6 million at this time for a new 1300 ft. lock at Sault Ste. Marie. However, if construction of this lock is to proceed despite these objections it should include the following elements not included in the Detroit District's final interim feasibility study. They are:

(1) Dredged materials be used to enhance the local environment.
(2) An improved traffic monitoring system on the St. Mary's River.
(3) Proviaions of public access to the St. Mary'a River Rapids.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Water Conservation

THEREFOREs BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United supports water conservation planning, programs, and measures in the Great Lakes region and in more arid regions in the U.S. and Canada, not only for present needs but also for use by future generations; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the conversion of additional arid lands to agricultural lands through irrigation.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Reauthorization of the Coastal Zone Management Act

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Coastal Management Act be reauthorized with continued etrong federal support for state management programs; and

BE IT FURTHER RBSOLVBD THAT, special emphasis and additional funding be provided for additional acquisition of estuarine sanctuaries forprotection and study; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the crippling Supreme Court decision undermining the consietency provision be overturned in the area of offahore oil and gas leaeing, and that the federal consistency provision be strengthened to encompass other important federal activities, such as the designation of ocean incineration sites; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Coaetal Zone Management Act, with a reinstituted consistency provision for ell federal activities directly affecting states' coastal zonee, be expeditiously reauthorized by Congress at adequate funding levels during the 1984 legielative session.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution