Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Description Organization Date publishedsort icon Content Type
Introduction of Exotic Species Through Ship Ballast

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports the development and implementation of research and regulation to stop the introduction of exotic species into the Great Lakes Basin by ships ballast waters.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Adoption of Proposed Toxic Water Pollution Control Regulations in Wisconsin

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board and the members of the Wisconsin legislature to remedy the deficiencies described above by amending the draft regulations proposed by the WDNR to include the improvements recommended by Great Lakes United and the other groups participating in the Wisconsin Campaign for Clean Water and then to adopt them in final form; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to the Governor of Wisconsin, the Secretary of the WDNR, members of the appropriate committees of the Wisconsin legislature, and all seven members of the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Winter Navigation

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its long-standing opposition to Winter Navigation; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that our opposition be one of Great Lakes United's highest priorities.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
New York State's Great Lakes Program

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support a legislative proposal to create a Great Lakes Advisory Council with representatives from conservation/environmental groups, private sector overnment agencies, and the legislature to assist in the implementation of New York's Great Lakes Agenda and to advise the Governor and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on Great Lakes issues; AND

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports full membership of New York State and Pennsylvania in the Council of Great Lakes Governors and supports a close cooperative relationship with the Premiers of Ontario and Quebec.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Criteria for Reviewing Remedial Action Plans

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United publicly circulate the followin criteria for reviewing RAPs to the IJC, the government agencies responsible for preparing the plans, member groups and others interested and involved with RAPs:

1. Was the public participation process used in the preparation of the remedial action plan adequate? If not, what additional actions are necessary?
2. Was the public involved in the identification of impaired uses and problems?
3. Was the public involved in choosing preferred remedial strategies?
4. How will the public be involved in ensuring the implementation of the remedial action plan?
5. How will the public be involved in decisions made regarding the completion of remedial actions and the decision that all beneficial uses have been restored?
6. Were the public's concerns and recommendations adequately responded to?
7. Are the remediation objectives clear and consistent with the general and specific objectives of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement?
8. Have the geographic boundaries of the area of concern been appropriately and clearly defined?
9. In cases where the Area of Concern crosses an international border, has an international RAP been prepared?
10. Have impaired uses (both human and non-human) been identified?
11. Have the problems causing the impaired uses been described well? Is the data adequate to do this?
12. If the data is not adequate, what additional studies are necessary? Who will do them? When? Funding?
13. Have the contributions of each point and non-point source been assessed and compared to each other to determine the relative source loading?
14. Have the adverse effects on all ecosystem components been identified?
15. Have all appropriate remedial strategies been described?
16. Have the remedial strate ies been described completely, including any negative effects that could result from their implementation?
17. Has the choice for preferred remedial strategies been based on ecological Found? (i .e. the preferred strategies shoul be effective but not further disrupt the ecosystem).
18. Will the proposed remedial strategies be effective in achieving the objectives of the remedial action plan? Are the proposed remedial strategies consistent with the general and specific objectives of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement?
19. Is there a schedule for implementation and completion of remedial measures?
20. Have the agencies responsible for remediation been identified and accepted responsibility?
21. Are there adequate funds and staff resources set aside for implementation of the remedial strategies?
22. Is there an adequate monitoring process outlined to measure the effectiveness of the remedial strategies and to ensure that remediation is completed?
23. Is there an adequate process set up to measure any adverse effects of the remedial strategies?

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes that all of the above criteria should be answered affirmatively for RAPs to be judged complete; AND,

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United request the Water Quality Board of the IJC to establish and publicize clear listing and delisting criteria for Areas of Concern; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United advises that otwithstanding complex environmental problems, RAPs be constructed and review with a bias for immediate action; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United recommends that implementation of RAPs be part of the annual agreements between the states and US EPA to implement the Clean Water Act and between Ontario and Canada to implement the Canada Ontario Agreement.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Protection Fund

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the concept of the states establishing a fund to provide additional, stable, long term financing of Great Lakes research, monitoring and clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Great Lakes Governors and a steering committee of the Great Lakes Protection Fund to provide for environmental group and public representation on the steering committee, the Board of Trustees and on all other entities created to oversee or administer the Fund; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that this endowment fund not be invested in corporations or municipalities or bond issues of those entities who have a record of violations of environmental laws; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that contributions to the Fund and disbursements from it should supplement and not replace direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activites, and that such fudning be consistent with the "polluter pays" principle as adopted by Canada and the Unisted States as members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Governors should agree to perform and make public an annual audit of each state's spending on Great Lakes research, monitoring, and clean-up activities, including the expenditure of federal grant funds, so as to demonstrate that contributions to or from the Fund are not replacing direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the governing body of the Fund with the advice of policymakers throughout the basin should establish clear priorities as to the types of projects eligible for funding and that, within those priority categories, funding decisions should be made exclusively on their scientific merit; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the participation of Ontario and Quebec in the Fund or the establishment of a companion fund in Ontario and Quebec; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that all research, literature review leading to that research, and monitoring data be made readily available to the public.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United formally endorses the recommendations in Unfulfilled Promises; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United member organizations develop an implementation strategy for the findin s of Unfulfilled Promises, and promote adequate public participation in review o f the Agreement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU focus priority attention on the virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances and zero discharge. The Water Quality Task Force, in cooperation with member groups and staff, shall develop a definition of zero discharge, suggest alternatives for persistent toxic substances and develop an action plan to advocate the changes. GLU also advocates the inclusion in any amended GLWQA of a commitment by the two countries to develop timetables to achieve virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances in the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the implementation of zero discharge goals through state and provincial legislative/regulatory initiatives such as the proposed Safe Drinking ater Act in New Yor state; AND

FINALLY BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these state/provincial initiatives have estabfished timetables for implementation.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of Great Lakes Research Laboratories

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research rograms because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to:

(1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
(2) EPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Ile, Michigan;
(3) Great Lakes research pro rams funded through the United States Commerce De artment's ea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region ocused on restoring environmental quality;
(4) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Fisheries Center - Great Lakes, Ann Arbor, Michigan; AND
(5) NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act; AND

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
NUCLEAR WASTES AND NUCLEAR PLANTS AROUND THE GREAT LAKES BASIN

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United includes all radioactive wates in the definition of hazardous or toxic wastes; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes new construction, and/or completion/start-up of nuclear power plants within the Great Lakes Basin, and that those plants already built within the Basin be phased out as soon as possible.

Great Lakes United Jun 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes United Resolution Summaries 1983 - 1987

Resolution Summaries topcis are Air Pollution, Fallout, Water Quality, Hazardous Waste, Toxic Substances, Water Levels, Water Flow, Diversions, Navigation, Fish Health, Wildlife Health, Habitat Health, Land Use, Energy Distribution, Energy Development, and Education.

Great Lakes United May 5 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Air Toxics

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United formally endorses the findings of the Toxic Air Pollution in the Great Lakes Basin: A Call for Action; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United participate in the ongoing public participation process on the proposed Canadian Environmental Protection Act, dealing with the control of toxic air emissions;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United will work to develop an implementation strategy for the regulatory and research recommendation of the report; and

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support federal legislative field hearings in the Great Lakes Basin on the issue and amendments to federal Clean Air Acts to carry out the goals of the report.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Detroit Incinerator

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United emphatically reaffirms its resolution on incineration of municipal solid waste as adopted at the Annual Meeting on May 18, 1986, and opposes the construction of the Detroit Resource Recovery Facility unless it is equipped with state of the art technology including a baghouse and dry scrubber;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any incinerator must not be allowed to operate without a proper emission monitoring system for toxic pollutants in place, the results of which must be available to governments and publics in both the United States and Canada;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an integrated waste management strategy must be developed with an emphasis on, and articulation of plans to implement recycling and waste reduction programs. Any such strategy should contain mechanisms to provide for public participation in all stages of development.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any new municipal waste incinerators not be built until the affected area has exhausted all efforts to reduce at least 50% of its waste through recycling, recovery, reuse, reduction, composting, and other alternative waste management strategies other than landfilling, and only then can such facitilities be built if they meet the standards of lowest achievable emission rates.

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United members continue to urge Mayor Coleman Young, the City of Detroit, and Governor Blanchard to support these resolutions and the organization consider joining the appropriate legal case which would force state of the art pollution control devices on the plant.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Permanent Solutions to Toxic Landfills

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United calls upon the Environrental Protection Agency to replace their general policy for remedial action at abondoned hazardous waste sites in the Great Lakes Basin with a policy which emphasises permanent solutions to these
problems through:
1. source removal of mobile wamtes in an environmentally sound and humanly safe manner using Best Available Technology,
2. clean-up technologies and remedial alternatives that lead to effective waste destruction employing Best Available Technology.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United be authorized to join local organizations actively opposing construction and operation of new land burial facilities such as CECOS Secure Chemical Residue Facility (SERF) #6 being proposed by CECOS Int'l.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Land Use

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United objects to the City of Erie's proposed zoning regulations. GLU advocates amendments to the proposed zoning package which adhere to the following guidelines:
1. The zoning should protect the environmental health of Presque Isle Harbor.
2. The zoning should guarantee maximum public access.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU requests that the U.S. EPA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the federal Coastal Zone Management Program administrators, and others, as deemed appropriate, investigate Pennsylvania's implementation of the Coastal Zone Managment Program in Erie; and

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU petition the International Joint Commission to add Presque Isle Bay, Harbor, and the area surrounding Erie , Pennsylvania , to the IJC's list of Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Levels Flows and Diversions II

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition the government of Ontario to reverse its decision not to designate this project and to formally designate this project under the Environmental  Assessment Act or to establish a commission under Public Inquiries Act to suspend approvals process and to report within 60 days.

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United work with the Friends of the Magpie River to ensure these environmental concerns are addressed and no increased diversion are permitted into the Great Lakes Basin.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Levels and Diversions I

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support legislative and administrative proposals which recognize the natural fluctuation of lake levels and, address long-term solutions to lake level problems including improved coastal zone management practices, establishment of flood sensitive zones, restrictions on building on barrier island and flood sensitive zones, utilization of environmentally sound shoreline protection devices and a better understanding of the flow-thru rates from one lake to another.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support one-time federal emergency assistance to Great Lakes shoreline property owners for the necessary financial resources to relocate families, set-back structures and/or buy out existing properties for public use.

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United continues to oppose any increased diversions into or out of the Great Lakes Basin and promotes a regional water management and data collection system that implements the intent of the Great Lakes Charter.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Overflow Dredging

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United actively seek to stop overflow dredging.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of Great Lakes

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to:

(1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
(2) EPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Ile, Michigan;
(3) Great Lakes research programs funded through the United States Commerce Department's Sea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region;
(4) Great Lakes research programs funded through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and
(5) NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Toxic Agreements

THBREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United supports promulgation and implementation of the Greet Lakee Toxic Substances Control Agreement;

BE IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement in the implementation and review of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement is essential to the control of toxic pollutants entering the Great Lakes System;

BB IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement is the design of any Basin-wide agreement including, at a minimum, consultation and responce as provided for in the agreement, is essential to the control of toxic pollutants; and

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that the success of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement in controlling the entry of toxic pollutants into the Great Lakes system is dependent upon continuing public involvement.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Airborne Toxic Pollutants

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United recommends the following refinements to state, federal and provincial air quality programs:

Sources of non-criteria pollutants should use Best Available Control Technology to reduce and/or eliminate toxic releases.
Probable sources of toxic air emissions should conduct and report emission inventories to identify and quantify potential carcinogens and other toxic chemicals.
Extraordinary releases of toxic pollutants should be immediately reported by the polluter to local health agencies and state'and federalenvironmental protection agencies.

Et Cetera.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Legislative Hearings on Toxic Deposition

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United requests the:

United States House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce; and
the United states Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works; and
the Canadian Special Committee on Acid Rain; and
the Ontario Legislative Committee on Environment,
to hold (oversight) hearings throughout the Great Lakes Basin on the issue of toxic airborne deposition.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Use of Oil Over-Charge Monies

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes states apply a significant amount of funds to long-term and meaningful energy conservation efforts and utilization of renewable energy sourcee consistent with the court decieion.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Costal Zone Management

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOVLED THAT those states with federally approved Coastal Management Programs under the DZMA should work expeditiously to significantly improve their Programs, and that pertinent Canadian federal and provincial jurisdictions vigorously undertake protection of costal areas.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT states without federally approved Coastal Management Programs under the CZMA should make the creation and approval of a Program a top priority; and,

BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED THAT Coastal Management Programs should include strict erosion set-back regulations, a coherent policy overseeing commercial and residential lakefront development and assured access for the public to lakefront areas; and,

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT serious water quality issues, including but not limited to toxic pollution, acidic deposition, heavy metals and other pollutants associated with development, be address by the Great Lakes states so that water-dependant industries, and recreational and aesthetic uses of the Lakes can continue; and,

BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED THAT coastal barriers not presently protected by state or federal laws, and those that are proposed for inclusion in the Coastal Barriers Resources System, be included in the System.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United endorse the establishment of a US-Canadian joint Coastal Management program.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Inclusion of Fish and Wildlife for Consideration in Remedial Action Plans

THEREFOREI BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United request the International Joint Commission and i t e Water Quality Board, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and its habitat Advisory Board and the 32 Federal, State, and Provincial reaource agencies that in the drafting and implementation of Remedial Action Plans:

1. Fish and,Wildlife habitat needs be given full consideration;
2. Fish and Wildlife professioaala be involved from the start;
3. Great Lakea United and other citizens be involved;
4. Commieeions and Agencies be requested to keep Great Lakes United and other citizens' grouge provided with information on the development process.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution