Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization |
Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quebec-Canada St. Lawrence River Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Quebec - Canada Agreement include a section specifying that the St. Lawrence River clean up effort must have a public participation component similar to the ones In C.O.A. and the GLWQA. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition Congress to Increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to Inflation since 1980; these programs Include, but are not limited to: 1. NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Michigan DNR |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the abolishment of the citizen boards and commission. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Public Involvement in the Negotation of a Revised Canada-Ontario Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges both negotiating partles to the Canada-Ontario Agreement to: 1) Acknowledge the right of the publlc and thereby the right of the R.A.P. Public Advisory Committees to be provided the opportunity to present public concerns and expectations to both negotiating parties, respecting the R.A. P. process and Implementation of remedial actions within C .O.A.; and 2) Provide such oppohunity In good faith and prior to finalizing a C.O.A. draft document to ensure full opportunity for consideration and inclusion of public expressions and recommendations in all C.O.A. negotiations; and 3) Recognize the urgency for completing a new C.O.A. and therefore arranging for public consultation without any further delay. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Reform the National Flood Insurance Program |
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United strongly supports S. 1650. and calls on Senator Riegle, and all other Great Lakes Senators to protect the bill from weakening changes and promptly pass the bill in the Senate Banking Committee and full Senate. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Wolfe and North Fox Islands |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU call on the Province of Ontario to conduct a thorough review of the proposed Mathews prolect under the Environmental Assessment Act and the Federal Canadian Government under the Environmental Assessment Review Process in order to ensure that the project will have the minimum adverse impact on the island's natural resources, the rural community of Wolfe lsland and the international Thousand Islands region. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Diversions |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its opposition to any out-of-basin diversion, AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United specifically oppcses the Lowell, IN diversion. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| US EPA's Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United, at its 1992 annual meeting in Saginaw, Michigan, calls upon U.S. EPA Administrator William Reilly to restore the public's right of access and right to comment on the importance of the lnitiative by immediately publishing the draft rules in the Federal Register and holding public hearings, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we call on governments at all levels to immediately implement programs to stop the discharge of toxic chemicals into Great Lakes and their tributaries, and to implement the promises in the U.S.€anada Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and the U.S. Clean Water Act. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that GLU calls upon all its member organizations to write Administrator William Reilly calling for the immediate publication of the draft rules in the Federal Register. Additionally, the letter should request that during public comment period, EPA provide education and Information dissemination as part of the public hearings. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, GLU encourages member organizations to educate their members about the issues pertaining to the Great Lakes initiative in preparation to actively participate In the public hearings along with submitting written comments during the public comment period. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Clean Water Jobs Program |
THEREFORE, Great Lakes United supports the Labor and Environmental Clean Water/Jobs Funding Proposal which:
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will work with Industry, Labor and Environmental Groups In the Great Lakes Basin and nationwide to promote this Clean Water/Jobs Program as part of the Clean Water Act debate, ensure that new facilities built wlth these funds are separated from toxic industrial wastes and inform the Great Lakes Congressional Delegalion of this resolution. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Implement Indiana's Water Quality Standards |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the delegates assembled for the 10th Annual Meeting of Great Lakes United, this 3rd day of May, 1992, that: 1) The lndiana Water Pollution Control Board, IWPCB, be requested to adopt proposed revisions to Indiana's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, NPDES, rule, 327 IAC 5, as expeditiously as possible to implement limits in NPDES permits for discharges to the State's surface waters which will assure standards In 327 IAC 2-1 that adequately protect human, terrestrial, and aquatic life from the toxic Impacts of water pollutants are met: AND 2) The IWPCB Include In those revisions, a requirement to phase out as expeditiously as possible the use of mixing or any dilution allowances for discharges of both the 43 pollutants annotated in Indiana's new water quality standards rule "to be bloconcentrating and of concern" and to sunset these and any other chemicals currently Identified and any other pollutants cunently Identified by the U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative as "Bioaccumulative Chemicals of Concern," AND 3) The IWPCB include in those revisions, a requirement to employ alternative techniques, such as monitoring of internal processes, caged biota studies, or regular analysis of tissues of resident fish species for detecting and restricting discharges of pollutants whose water'quality based effluent limits are below levels of detection or quantitation; AND 4) The WPCB retain the State's ability In those revisions to enforce the Level of Detection as a compliance point in NPDES permits when water quality based effluent limits are below the Level of Detection; AND 5) To prevent further loading of pollutants in impaired waters, the IWPCB prohibit in those revisions, discharges of Intake water containing concentrations of a background pollutant in excess of its water quality based effluent limit to receiving waters that are not from the same source as the intake water; AND 6) The IWPCB retain the variance provision in the new water quality standards rule, 327 IAC 2-1 -8.8, and in revisions to the NPDES rule, that will place a burden of proof on a discharger to make the maximum effort possible to meet a water quality based effluent limit for a pollutant, through reducing, eliminating or treating a pollutant in the effluent, before being eligible for consideration of a variance from meeting that water quality based effluent limit; AND 7) To cleanup Indiana's impaired surface waters, the IWPCB not add criteria for variances to the new water quality standards rule or the NPDES rule revisions that would include conditions in the receiving stream, such as background pollutants, low flow, other physical features or human induced conditions as grounds for considering variances from meeting water quality standards. |
Great Lakes Universe | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Open Water Disposal in Maumee Bay |
THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the U.S. and Canadian Governments not to dispose of contaminated sediments in the open waters of the Great Lakes; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Corps of Engineers must abide by state water quality standards t o the extent mandated in Section 404 of the Clean-Water Act in determining the Federal Standard for the disposal of dredged sediments. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Continuing Government Support of Beluga Whale Research in the St. Lawrence |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United contact the Canadian Minister of the Environment and Members of Parliament to request the continued funding from the Wildlife Protection Fund for Pierre Beland's critical research and matching funds he sought from the appropriate U.S. Federal Agency t o recognize their binational responsibility to protect this endangered species. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes United Taskforce on Labour and the Environment |
THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED place a high and immediate priority on obtaining new funding to support the work of the Labor/Enviranment Task Force, with the objective of supporting paid staff time and providing other necessary resources; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will introduce and promote the principle of worker compensation and economic protection as well as other options in all its pollution BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the GREAT LAKES UNITED'S Taskforce on Labour and the Environment will take responsibi1ity for reviewing and evaluating current worker protection and compensation programs as they exist in the Great Lakes Basin with the future task of providing further policy recommendations to the Board as required. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Wetland Protection in Canada |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the government of Ontario to substantially revise and immediately implement the draft Provincial Wetlands Planning Policy Statement; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must immediately develop effective wetlands protection legislation and expedite its implementation and enforcement to provide effective protection for wetlands; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must undergo a full review of the municipal land use planning and review process to ensure that it provides adequate protection for wetlands; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the meantime, all existing statutes and regulations that provide for the protection of all wetlands must be used and enforced, including the Conservation Authorities Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, the Public Lands Act, and the Federal Fisheries Act. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Wetland Protection in United States |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Congress of the United States to proceed deliberately in reauthorizing the Clean Water Act, and to oppose the numerous bills that would weaken wetland protection provisions of the Act, particularly Section 404; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Congress explicitly include wetland protection in the Clean Water Act Goal Statement, and that the current regulatory definition of waters of the United BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the list of activities regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act be expanded to include all activities that may damage or degrade wetlands such as draining, dredging, channelizing, flooding, placement of floating and piling supported structures; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 401 should be amended to expressly broaden the protections provided by this section to include wetlands, and direct states to address physical and biological alterations of aquatic areas, as well as chemical pollution; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Nationwide permit program should be substantially revised to control ongoing cumulative wetland losses, specifically to (1) eliminate Nationwide General Permit No. 26, (2) comply with Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines, and (3) prohibit using multiple general permits to avoid the acreage limitations of other general or individual permit requirements. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Wetlands |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a new Annex specifically addressing wetlands losses and their effects on the integrity of the Great Lakes ecosystem be added to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement at its next revision; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for the wetland base in the Great Lakes Basin to be restored, the U,S, and Canadian federal governments should immediately declare the Great Lakes Basin a "demonstration region" for a "Net Gain" in wetland functions and quantity. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Hydropower Projects in the James Bay Region |
THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the James Bay hydropower project until its effects on native cultures and the environment are fully addressed by New York State and Canada in a comprehensive environmental study; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports Assembly Bill 2162A as a step towards the State of New York becoming responsible consumers of electricity and for the protection of the environment; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United commends Assemblymen William B. Hoyt and Maurice D. Hinchey for their leadership in introducing Assembly bill A2162A. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Open Space Protection in Canada |
BE I T RESOLVED, that to further promote and encourage the protection of land in the Province of Ontario and the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Region, that the Provincial Government be urged and encouraged to adopt legislation that will allow private not-for-profit organizations to acquire conservation easements; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Federal Government be urged to change Canadian Federal Law so that it promotes the use of the conservation easement by providing tax incentives f o r property owners, that is, making gifts of such easements tax-deductible to the property owner(s). |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Permanent Diversion of Water Out of Great Lakes Basin at Lowell Indiana |
BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges the Great Lakes governors to withhold approval of Lowell's water diversion proposal; AND BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED THAT, alternatives should be publicly examined in more detail, including the alternative for the state to commit to supporting construction of a pipeline to re-divert the water back into Lake Michigan (as was agreed to in the Wisconsin case) and also water conservation methods that will be used with timetables for implementation of these measures. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| US Bill to Expand Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United will send letters to key legislators in the House supporting the passage of Congressman Peter Viscloskeyf's Dunes Expansion bill ("The Columbus Day Comprise) ; send letters to Senators Lugar and Coats urging that a comparable or better bill be introduced in the Senate; send letters to key senators supporting the passage of such legislation this year; and encourage its constituent members to also support these efforts with letters to their senators and congress people on their own letterhead whenever feasible. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Lake Superior |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the governments of the United States, Canada, Ontario, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota to immediately implement a moratorium for new or increased discharges of persistent toxic pollutants to Lake Superior until the International Joint Commission recommendation has been implemented; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments use their statutory authority to designate Lake Superior as an Outstanding National Resource Water (ONRW) for persistent toxic pollutants, the highest protective status given to water bodies under the U.S. Clean Water Act, and that the Lake be given a similar protective status under Canadian law; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments immediately schedule a phase out of the use of chlorine in the pulp and paper industry to eliminate the major point source of persistent toxic pollutants to Lake Superior; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments take other appropriate action to implement the International Joint Commission recommendation for Lake Superior as a demonstration area. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Zero Discharge and Pollution Prevention | Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution | |
| Public Participation in Remedial Action Plan Implementation |
BE I T FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments fund this public consultation process; AND BE I T FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Canada-Ontario Agreement formally ensure that the public is consulted in all actions undertaken to implement the Remedial Action Plans.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the U.S. and Canadian governments ensure that the public is involved in the implementation of all U.S. and Canadian Remedial Action Plans;
AND |
Great Lakes Universe | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Trail Creek Indiana |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United strongly urges the International Joint Commission to recommend, and the U.S. and Canadian federal governments to designate, Trail Creek, Indiana as an Area of Concern. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Canada-Ontario Agreement |
THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United and other environmental organizations be formally included as full participants in the renegotiation of the Canada-Ontario Agreement. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |