Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Titlesort icon Description Organization Date published Content Type
Navigation I

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the members of Great Lakes United are hereby advised to be prepared to communicate to Members of Congress, their concerns relative to winter navigation just prior to the vote; and to remind those Congressmen that signed the letter of opposition of their commitment; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United wishes to extend its appreciation for the outstanding contributions of several public officials who have played key roles in organizing the opposition to this legislation, including Canadian Minister of the Environment Ckarlee Caccia, Canadian-U.S. Ambassador Allan Gotlieb, Michigan Governor James Blanchard, Michigan Congressmen David Bonior, Robert Davis, Dennis Hertel, Harold Sawyer, New York Congressmen Henry Nowak and David O.B. Martin, and Minnesota Congressman James Oberstar.

Great Lakes United May 13 1984 Great Lakes United resolution
Navigation II

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United reaffirm its Navigation Resolution of 1983; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Navigation Task Force undertake the preparation of a poeition paper representing the Great Lakee United view of commercial navigation use of the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence. In the preparation of this poaition paper, the task force will consider the need to place the issue of navigation on the Great Lakes within the wider context of social, economic and environmental factors--the ecosystem approach. Specifically, the task force shall address navigation issues, including:

  • user fees;
  • additional locks and channel widening;
  • harbor and port development and improvement;
  • coordination of research between the United States and Canada;
  • winter navigation end season extension; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, with these considerations in mind the task force shall develop a Great Lakes United action strategy for effective protection of the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the task force shall submit its poaition paper and recomrendations to the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting in 1985, with recorrendationa for inmediate action forwarding to the Board of Directors in the interim.

Great Lakes United May 13 1984 Great Lakes United resolution
Navigation on the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence River Waterway System

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes United navigation task force should be broadened and continue its work for the purpose of:

(1) investigating the critical issues which have been advanced in the position paper and any others which may arise; and

(2) work along with Great Lakes United members in the development and refining of an action strategy for implementation of Great Lakes United resolutions on commercial navigation; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United Navigation's Task Force-promote the following recommendations:

The establishment of uniform and coordinated regulatory standards and rules governing commercial navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System which takes the unique environmental, 'social, climatic, economic conditions of the Basin into account. Elements to be coneidered in these uniform regulatory initiatives are:

1. limitation of hazardous goods transported on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System to ice free and good weather conditions;

2. and in some instances, completely banning the transportation of some kinds of hazardous material, such as radiotoxic material;

3. the enactment of provisions which would impart absolute liability for carriers and shippers of hazardous materials;

4 . the application of stringent safety requirements (which would equal thoee most stringent standards now existing in the basin);

5. the mandatory development of proven containment and clean-up provisions and mechanisms

6. the creation of coordinated mechanisms to ensure the proper monitoring and enforcement of the uniform regulations between Canada and the U.S

7. further research ott the ecological and human health effects of various substances and materials and the working toward a more specific and uniform definition of "hazardous" and "dangerous" material.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
NECIS Economics Factsheet

 Economic impact of invasive species from the live animal trade

NECIS Nov 1 2011 Factsheet
NECIS NASIA Support Letter

National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species, support letter to NASIA

 

Multiple Letter, comment, or government submissions
NECIS Position Statement: Decreasing Ecological Risks Related to International Trade

NECIS Position Statement on Decreasing Ecological Risks Related to International Trade

Multpile Letter, comment, or government submissions
NECIS Position Statement: Reducing Introductions of invasive species

Position Statement: Reducing Introductions of Invasive Species

The Problem: Continued Introductions of Damaging Species

 

Multiple Letter, comment, or government submissions
NECIS: Position Statement: Improving Funding to Address Invasive Species

Position Statement: Improving Funding to Address Invasive Species

Multiple Letter, comment, or government submissions
Need for Strong Medical Waste Regulations

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United:

  • Urges the International Joint Commission to advocate strongly with the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada to adopt strong rules which eliminate the discharge of persistent toxic compounds from medical waste incinerators,
  • Urges the International Joint Commission to advocate for and work with the health care industry to adopt a materials policy which will lead to zero discharge of persistent toxic compounds, and
  • Urges the U.S. EPA to adopt strong rules to eliminate the formation of dioxin and the release of mercury by medical waste incinerators, and to encourage the health care industry to adopt a materials policy which will lead to zero discharge of persistent toxic substances.
Great Lakes United May 31 1997 Great Lakes United resolution
New Directional Oil and Gas Drilling Within and Under the Great Lakes

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United and its member organizations implement the following strategies:

  • Urge the immediate passage of federal legislation banning new oil and gas drilling in the Great Lakes and directional drilling under the Great Lakes.
  • Continue to seek a permanent moratorium on drilling on a statewide and provincewide basis.
Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
New Exhaust Emission Standards for Commercial Vessels Poised to Protect Health

To protect human health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing more stringent exhaust emission standards for the largest marine diesel engines. These engines are used for propulsion on marine commercial vessels (called Category 3 engines) sailing in US coastal waters out to 200 nautical miles (the “Emission Control Area” or “ECA”).EPA’s proposal will also apply to C3 vessels operating in the Great Lakes (some ships, called Lakers, operate exclusively in the Great Lakes). These proposed Clean Air Act standards are part of a coordinated U.S.–Canada strategy to address emissions from the largest commercial marine vessels that affect North America’s air quality. EPA has previously regulated smaller marine engines found mainly in coastal and inland waterways, such as tugboats, push boats, fishing boats, ferries, etc.

Great Lakes United; Ohio Environmental Council Oct 28 2009 Factsheet
New International Standards and National Invasive Species Act Reauthorization

The undersigned Great Lakes organizations maintain that a coordinated, national solution to the problem of aquatic invasive species is the preferred management option, and that NAISA is the best available tool to move that solution forward. Nevertheless, distinct ecosystems such as the Great Lakes do call for special approaches, and we ask that you include the recommendations below in NAISA.

Eastern Surfing Association; Environmental Advocates of New York; Great Lakes United; Lake Michigan Federation; Lake Superior Alliance; Michigan United Conservation Clubs; National Wildlife Federation; Ohio Environmental Council; Save the River; Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council; Trout Unlimited-Illinois Council; Western Pennsylvania Conservancy; Wisconsin Association of Lakes Apr 28 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
New York State Environmental Assistance Fund

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United supports the concept of funding environmental improvement projects from the recovery of unclaimed beverage container deposits and other sources, and that Great Lakes United supports enactment of New York State's Environmental Assistance Fund to assist municipalities in financing needed environmental projects, preserve and protect open space, enhance public recreational opportunities, and assist Adirondack Park communities in developing and improving land use plans.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1993 Great Lakes United resolution
New York State's Great Lakes Program

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support a legislative proposal to create a Great Lakes Advisory Council with representatives from conservation/environmental groups, private sector overnment agencies, and the legislature to assist in the implementation of New York's Great Lakes Agenda and to advise the Governor and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on Great Lakes issues; AND

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports full membership of New York State and Pennsylvania in the Council of Great Lakes Governors and supports a close cooperative relationship with the Premiers of Ontario and Quebec.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
NGOs who support the stopping of Nuclear Generator shipment

As of October 15, 2010. This is an updated list of NGOs signing in support of stopping the shipment of Radioactive Nuclear Generators.

Nuclear Free Task Force Letter, comment, or government submissions
No Dry Casks Should Be Permitted on the Great Lakes

Be It Resolved, that no more dry casks should be permitted to be loaded on the shores of the Great Lakes and that cost effective alternatives to the continued generation of nuclear waste be implemented with all due speed.

Great Lakes United Jun 7 1998 Great Lakes United resolution
North American Free Trade Agreement

Therefore be

it resolved that Great Lakes United reaffirms its commitment to work to oppose the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1993 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Power in Ontario

THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVEil, that Great Lakes United's individual members and organizations, demand that the Government of Ontario immedidely institute an electricity eficiency programme aimed at reducing the ratio of electricity used per dollar Gross Provincial Product (GPP) by half; and immediately place an indefinite moratorium on the approval, planning or construciion of new nuclear power stations in the Province.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Power Stations

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the taskforce publish regular reports on its findings so as to gain a better understanding of the potential threat of radionuclide contamination on fish, wildlife and aquatic populations and on drinking water supplies taken from the Great Lakes and its impacts on aquatic, wildlife and human health.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1994 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Regulations

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will encourage citizens' groups to compile, analyze and disseminate data cn radiological effluents of gaseous,liquid and solid wastes from nuclear reactors, nuclear weapcns facilities, uranium mines, millings and nuclear waste sites. These data should be obtained with independent verification; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will dedicate staff and organizational resources to more aggressive grass roots education projects on nuclear issues, encourage board members in every state and province to attend appropriate public forums to state Great Lakes United's position on these issues and report on all activities in next year's annual report.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE B6 IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United urge the U.S. Department of Energy and Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. that any potential sites for nuclear waste repositories in the Qreat Lakes/St. Lawrence watershed be immediately disqualified from any further consideration for such use, and furthermore, future plans for nuclear waste repositories must consider the magnitude and ecologic seneitivity of the hydrological features of the location being reviewed.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United make the reclassification of Class C low level radioactive waste to high level a top priority issue.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste Transport in the Great Lakes Basin

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United actively promote new federal, state, provincial and local regulations to suspend the transportation of high level nuclear waste within the Great Lakes Basin until such a time that the above concerns are fully addressed and the safe transport of the fuel can be assured.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
NUCLEAR WASTES AND NUCLEAR PLANTS AROUND THE GREAT LAKES BASIN

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United includes all radioactive wates in the definition of hazardous or toxic wastes; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes new construction, and/or completion/start-up of nuclear power plants within the Great Lakes Basin, and that those plants already built within the Basin be phased out as soon as possible.

Great Lakes United Jun 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution