Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Titlesort icon Description Organization Date published Content Type
Zero Discharge Task Force

WATER QUALITY RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION ON ZERO DISCHARGE TASK FORCE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United set up a Zero Discharge Task Force

A. Purpose
To build a zero discharge movement and constituency throughout the Great Lakes Basin by creating a basin wide Zero Discharge Alliance that includes individuals, grassroots community groups and other pro-environment groups throughout the basin.
1. Support and network zero discharge strategies and programs throughout the Basin.
2. Assist local community organizations.
3. Launch zero discharge campaign.
4. Develop productive and supportive relationship with labor.
a. Address displacement and job loss issues.
5. Any other activities suggested by the Task Force.

Over the next several months, the Zero Discharge Task Force will develop its terms of reference, the mechanisms for communication and support and a campaign. The Task Force's objective will be to launch the campaign in the fall with a Zero Discharge Alliance conference with the largest and broadest participation possible.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Zero discharge of biological pollution in the Great Lakes from ballast water by 2011

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the United States Congress to immediately adopt legislation establishing regulations and programs to reduce ballast water discharge that are at least as stringent as the provisions of S. 770, the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act, as introduced in March 2005, which will set nationwide standards and develop technology and place it onboard ships to prevent
releases of non-native invasive species by 2011, which is the preferred national solution.

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2005 Great Lakes United resolution
Zero Discharge and Pollution Prevention Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Zebra Mussel: Facts and Figures

Background information on the zebra mussel. Includes native range, history of invasion, biology, and ecological impacts.

Great Lakes United Mar 18 2008 Factsheet
Zebra Mussel Invasion: Unheeded Alarms

Scientists have been forecasting the introduction of zebra mussels to North America for over a century, and yet these alarm bells were ignored for decades. T.F Nalepa and D.W. Schlosser summarize several of these warnings in the opening of Zebra Mussels- Biology, Impacts and Control (1993, Lewis Publishers, CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL, 810 pp.) Quotes and reference citations from the book are listed in this document.

Great Lakes United Mar 18 2008 Factsheet
Zebra and Quagga Mussel Sightings Distribution

A map show sitings of zebra and quagga mussels across the United States.

United States Geological Survey Mar 18 2008 Factsheet
YUCCA MOUNTAIN RESOLUTION

BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United is on record as opposing any and all legislation which would override the State of Nevada’s Notice of Disapproval and which would require radioactive waste transportation near or through the Great Lakes states to Yucca Mountain;

And BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the creation of an independent presidential commission to re examine the U.S. national radioactive waste policy.

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2002 Great Lakes United resolution
Year After Great Lakes Charter

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1986 Annual Meeting of Great Lakes United formally endoraea the document and the following seven-point program recoamendations:

1. Each state and province should formally incorporate a water registration system for all users of Great Lakes waters. This mandatory registration system should include amounts of water returned to the Great Lakes system and in what quality. In addition, this system should not be used to legitimize existing diversion. We should not accept thie registration system as a basis for "grand-fathering" all existing diversions and consumptive uses.

2. Establish present consumptive use needs in the basin based on the registration data and develop projected future consumptive use needs under a variety of economic growth scenarios. This must be coordinated with the establishment of a data base that understand the quantity and quality of water available to the Great Lakes Basin.

3. Detailed analysis of the environmental, social and economic impacts of water diversion, and incorporate those findings into a Public Health and Welfare case. Economic impacts could only be incorporated as they relate to the health and welfare of the citizenry, to avoid economic protectionism as in the El Paso case.

4. Advocate water conservation/improvement programe within and outside the Great Lakes Basin.

5. Develop state and provincial prohibitive diversion legislation based on the Public Health and Welfare case.

6. Great Lakes jurisdicitions would defend the legislative ban on diversion of Great Lakes water out of the basin in courts based on the Public Health and Welfare case. If the legal case was loat, Great Lakes jurisdictions could then incorporate a permitting system for
water withdrawals.

7. Great Lakes jurisdictions would work with national and-international leaders to develop and implement anti-diversion legislation and agreement 8.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Wolfe and North Fox Islands

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU call on the Province of Ontario to conduct a thorough review of the proposed Mathews prolect under the Environmental Assessment Act and the Federal Canadian Government under the Environmental Assessment Review Process in order to ensure that the project will have the minimum adverse impact on the island's natural resources, the rural community of Wolfe lsland and the international Thousand Islands region.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Winter Navigation

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its long-standing opposition to Winter Navigation; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that our opposition be one of Great Lakes United's highest priorities.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetlands Protection

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United:

- opposes any attempts to reduce the scope of the Section 404 program or the protections now given wetlands by the U.S. EPAss 404(b) (1) Guidelines;
- supports reforms of existing federal farm programe to remove subsidies for production of taurplua crops on wetlande drained and cleared after 1981;
- recommends the elimination of federal, state, and provincial tax incentives for draining and clearing of wetlande.

 

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in United States

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Congress of the United States to proceed deliberately in reauthorizing the Clean Water Act, and to oppose the numerous bills that would weaken wetland protection provisions of the Act, particularly Section 404; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Congress explicitly include wetland protection in the Clean Water Act Goal Statement, and that the current regulatory definition of waters of the United
States be amended to presume that all waters and wetlands are susceptible to use in interstate commerce; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the list of activities regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act be expanded to include all activities that may damage or degrade wetlands such as draining, dredging, channelizing, flooding, placement of floating and piling supported structures; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 401 should be amended to expressly broaden the protections provided by this section to include wetlands, and direct states to address physical and biological alterations of aquatic areas, as well as chemical pollution; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Nationwide permit program should be substantially revised to control ongoing cumulative wetland losses, specifically to (1) eliminate Nationwide General Permit No. 26, (2) comply with Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines, and (3) prohibit using multiple general permits to avoid the acreage limitations of other general or individual permit requirements.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in Canada

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the government of Ontario to substantially revise and immediately implement the draft Provincial Wetlands Planning Policy Statement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must immediately develop effective wetlands protection legislation and expedite its implementation and enforcement to provide effective protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must undergo a full review of the municipal land use planning and review process to ensure that it provides adequate protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the meantime, all existing statutes and regulations that provide for the protection of all wetlands must be used and enforced, including the Conservation Authorities Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, the Public Lands Act, and the Federal Fisheries Act.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
West Valley nuclear wastes

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to disapprove DOE's attempts to declassify HLRW as "waste incidental to reprocessing" and abandon it on-site and Be it also resolved that Great Lakes United supports the exhumation and containment of the West Valley nuclear waste.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 2004 Great Lakes United resolution
Water withdrawal protections

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United calls on the governors and premiers of the Great Lakes basin to rapidly conclude their negotiations for an agreement pursuant to the principles of the Great Lakes Charter Annex (Annex 2001) and agree to a common system across the basin portion of all eight states and two provinces for managing human withdrawal and use of basin waters such that the basin ecosystem is protected, improved, and restored.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 2004 Great Lakes United resolution
Water Resources Development Act Request Letter - Asian Carp

A letter from the Great Lakes Task Force (U.S. members of Congress in the Great Lakes states) to the Committee on Environment and Public Works recommending that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers implement measures to authorize a study to separate the Great Lakes and Mississippi watersheds, and prevent the spread of invasive species.

Multiple May 24 2010 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Water Levels

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United affirm its opposition to construction of new water level control structures in the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the plan of study for Phase 2 of, the IJC water level study emphasize identifying responses to water level fluctuations that do not require structural controls. These include approaches such as coastal zone hazard planning and other land use management approaches.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Water Conservation

THEREFOREs BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United supports water conservation planning, programs, and measures in the Great Lakes region and in more arid regions in the U.S. and Canada, not only for present needs but also for use by future generations; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the conversion of additional arid lands to agricultural lands through irrigation.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Water as a Human Right 2012 Resolution

 Approved Resolution on Water as a Human Right voted in by membership at the 2012 AGM.

Great Lakes United Dec 1 2012 Great Lakes United resolution
Victory! Great Lakes- St. Lawrence River Navigation Study takes a 180!

Presentation material from the Navigation webinar that took place on August 2, 2011 at 12:00pm EDT.  

Save the River Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint)
Use of Risk Assessment for Regulating Carinogens

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United does not endorse the principle of quantitative risk assessment as the sole basis for eetabliahing environmental standards for carcinogens;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United also recognizes that the quantitative evaluation of data may be useful in sore circumstances, such as the prioritization of environmentally significant chemicals;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourages the development of alternative rethoda to set environrental standards for carcinogens, such as goals of non-detectable discharges and lowest achievable discharge linite, using Best Available Technology, where they prove to be more protective to human health and the environment;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourages the State, Provincial and Federal government and the IJC to coordinate the development of standards and guidelines consistent with the principles articulated in the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement or any revised agreement.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great LakeS United encourages the State, Provincial and Federal governments as well as industries that discharge wates into the Great Lakes, to expand their efforts to curtail the pollution of the Great Lakes by examing source reduction and source elimination technologies, and any other environmentally sound alternatives for waste disposal.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Use of Ontario Fishing License Revenues

Therefore be

it resolved that the Province of Ontario keep its original promise to use this revenue, as they had originally stated they would, for enhancement of remediation and fish stocking.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1993 Great Lakes United resolution
Use of Oil Over-Charge Monies

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes states apply a significant amount of funds to long-term and meaningful energy conservation efforts and utilization of renewable energy sourcee consistent with the court decieion.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Use of Non-Recyclable and Disposable Products

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United adopts a policy banning the use of disposable products, especially polystyrene and other plastic products, where alternative recyclable and reusable producis exist in ail its offices and at all its meetings, even when where such poiicy is understood to increase COSTS; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will adopt a policy promoting the recycling of all paper, glass and beverage czns used in its ofices and at all its meetings; AND

BE IT FGRTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will adopt a policy to use recycled paper in all its publications, the office and other activities to the greatest extent possicie; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thar Great Lakes United will publicize these policies wherever possible as a means of setting a positive example and acting as a model in this area.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
US Federal Wetlands Legislation

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes HR 1330 and S 1463 and endorses HR 4255 as an important, fair legislative tool to halt further loss of wetlands in the US.; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United will communicate this position to all U.S. Senators and Representatives from Great Lakes states within the next month.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution