Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
|
Title |
Description | Organization | Date published | Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Lakes United Taskforce on Labour and the Environment |
THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED place a high and immediate priority on obtaining new funding to support the work of the Labor/Enviranment Task Force, with the objective of supporting paid staff time and providing other necessary resources; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will introduce and promote the principle of worker compensation and economic protection as well as other options in all its pollution BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the GREAT LAKES UNITED'S Taskforce on Labour and the Environment will take responsibi1ity for reviewing and evaluating current worker protection and compensation programs as they exist in the Great Lakes Basin with the future task of providing further policy recommendations to the Board as required. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes United's Green Book |
A resource developed for the Great Lakes United TALL SHIPS CHALLENGE® 2010, the Green Book is a introductory guide to the problems affecting the Great Lakes in 2010. Topics include water conservation, Asian carp, toxics and pollution, wind energy and green gardening. |
Great Lakes United | Jan 6 2010 | Report |
| Great Lakes United’s Draft Comments on the International Upper Great Lakes Study |
Great Lakes United’s Draft Comments on the International Upper Great Lakes Study, International Joint Commission, March 2012. |
Great Lakes United | Jan 3 2012 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Great Lakes Water Conservation Plan |
Therefore be it resolved that the Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Management Committee established by the Great Lakes Charter draft a Great Lakes water conservation plan within the next year, and Be it further resolved that this plan require the states and provinces to review and map all drinking water supplies for their quality and long-term sustainability, and Be it further resolved that user pay principles be the foundation of this water conservation plan and uniform efficiency standards be developed for all sectors of society that use lake and/or groundwater supplies within the Basin watershed, and Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United seek funding to hold a workshop for members to explore ways to advocate for local water conservation programs and to explore the need of such programs for the sustainability of the Great Lakes. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Initiative |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, where the current effluent level of a discharge is below the permitted level for a particular parameter, any permit reissued shall require the current discharge level to be the new permitted level; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the wildlife criteria shall be designed to protect the most ecologically sensitive species; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the human health criteria shall be designed to protect high risk populations, including heavy consumers of fish and sensitive groups such as newborns and the elderly; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, as part of the implementation procedures, any permit which regulates discharges of bioaccumulative, persistent compounds shall include a sunset provision to phase out the use of the compound; therefore achieving zero discharge; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, any new or reissued permit must include a pollution prevention plan developed by the discharger and approved by the permitting agency; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, all aquatic, wildlife and human criteria shall be expanded to include protection from reproductive, neurological, and other non-cancer effects. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Levels and Diversions I |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support legislative and administrative proposals which recognize the natural fluctuation of lake levels and, address long-term solutions to lake level problems including improved coastal zone management practices, establishment of flood sensitive zones, restrictions on building on barrier island and flood sensitive zones, utilization of environmentally sound shoreline protection devices and a better understanding of the flow-thru rates from one lake to another. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support one-time federal emergency assistance to Great Lakes shoreline property owners for the necessary financial resources to relocate families, set-back structures and/or buy out existing properties for public use. FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United continues to oppose any increased diversions into or out of the Great Lakes Basin and promotes a regional water management and data collection system that implements the intent of the Great Lakes Charter. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Levels Flows and Diversions II |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition the government of Ontario to reverse its decision not to designate this project and to formally designate this project under the Environmental Assessment Act or to establish a commission under Public Inquiries Act to suspend approvals process and to report within 60 days. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United work with the Friends of the Magpie River to ensure these environmental concerns are addressed and no increased diversion are permitted into the Great Lakes Basin. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, amended in 1987. |
International Joint Commission | Report | |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following recommendations with respect to the Agreement, as well as such others as shall be developed by task forces of Great Lakes United, be brought to the attention of the International Joint Commission, the Governments of the United States and Canada, the Governors and Premiers of Great Lakes States and Provinces, members of Gongress and Parliament, the legislators of said states and provinces, and other interested parties. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT Great Lakes United reaffirms ite support of the policies of the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and opposes any weakening of the Agreement. Great Lakes United will continue to work towards increase public participation in the implementation and review of the Agreement and offers the following recommendations which apply to any opportunity to strengthen the Agreement by technical Amendment or other means: 1. The Parties ehould adopt an integrated approach to protecting both water quality and water quantity in the Great Lakee Basin. Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United formally endorses the recommendations in Unfulfilled Promises; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United member organizations develop an implementation strategy for the findin s of Unfulfilled Promises, and promote adequate public participation in review o f the Agreement; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU focus priority attention on the virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances and zero discharge. The Water Quality Task Force, in cooperation with member groups and staff, shall develop a definition of zero discharge, suggest alternatives for persistent toxic substances and develop an action plan to advocate the changes. GLU also advocates the inclusion in any amended GLWQA of a commitment by the two countries to develop timetables to achieve virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances in the Great Lakes; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the implementation of zero discharge goals through state and provincial legislative/regulatory initiatives such as the proposed Safe Drinking ater Act in New Yor state; AND FINALLY BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these state/provincial initiatives have estabfished timetables for implementation. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement 2011 - FAQ |
A document prepared by Great Lakes United answering common questions about the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (during the 2011-2012 renegotiation of the Agreement). |
Great Lakes United | Aug 9 2011 | Factsheet |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Negotiation Guide |
A background document prepared by Great Lakes United outlining major topics concerning the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (during the 2011-2012 renegotiation of the Agreement). |
Great Lakes United | Aug 9 2011 | Report |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Public Hearings |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges its member organizations to take an active role in the hearing(s) nearest them. Member organizations are urged to use the hearings and the accompanying hot-spot tours to: |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United, at its 1994 meeting in Buffalo, New York, reaffirms its support for a strong Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative, as expressed in comments of September 13, 1993, to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United believes that the GLI must be adopted and implemented on a consisknt basis throughout the eight Great Lakes States as binding regualation, not voluntary guidance, and the final rules should be made stronger than the draft proposal, not weaker; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls upon New York Governor Mario Cuomo and his fellow Governors of the Great Lakes States to maintain support for a strong GLI, and to allow U.S. EPA to complete its work finalizing the GLI without political interference; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes any legislative amendment to weaken the GLI. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1994 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Week |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United encourages the development of educational programs concerned with environmental issues. The organization urges its members to work on programs in their own localities, particularly for Great Lakes Week. Great Lakes United further recommends that the programs for Great Lakes Week be geared to attract a wider audience by including topics relating to environment (historical, recreational, etc,). |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Week |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United charge the Board of Directors to continue to designate a week to be called "Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Week" (GLW) for the purpose of educating citizens about the basin's hietory, ecology, and resource management issues; and to focus attention upon the Great Lakes ecoeyetem; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that since GLW encompasses all the educational goals of Great Lakes United, it should become a plenary seesion agenda item at the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting for ae long as Great Lakes United continues to proclaim Great Lakes Week; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that sember organizations of Great Lakes United take a coordinating role in organizing events for euch a week in their respective communities; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each Great Lakes United region designate a repreeentative to coordinate activities within their own region; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in order for a region to designate a GLW representative, Great Lakes regions of Great Lakes United need to meet to deeignate a representative; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Week Task Force of Great Lakes United designate individuals to obtain proclamations of each a week by Governors, Premiers, the President, the Prime Ministers and legislative bodies throughout the Great Lakes Basin; and Et Cetera |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Wetlands |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a new Annex specifically addressing wetlands losses and their effects on the integrity of the Great Lakes ecosystem be added to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement at its next revision; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for the wetland base in the Great Lakes Basin to be restored, the U,S, and Canadian federal governments should immediately declare the Great Lakes Basin a "demonstration region" for a "Net Gain" in wetland functions and quantity. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Zebra Mussel Research |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United, at its 1994 annual meeting in Buffalo, New York, petition Congress to restore full funding provided by the Non-Indigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to ensure the completion of current research programs designed to develop strategies to understand, deal with, and perhaps reduce the econornidecological impacts of the zebra mussel, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United call upon all its member organizations to write their Congresspersons and members of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees urging them to support the restoration of full funding for zebra,mussel research in the Great Lakes. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1994 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Zebra Quagga Mussel Research |
Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United petitions Congress to restore full funding provided by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to ensure the completion of current research programs designed to develop strategies to understand, deal with, and perhaps reduce the economic and ecological impacts of nonindigenous aquatic nuisance species such as zebra mussels and sea lamprey, and Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United call upon all its member organizations to write their state congresspersons and members of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees urging them to support the restoration of full funding for zebra mussel research in the Great Lakes. Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the Canadian federal through the agencies of Fisheries and Oceans in cooperation with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and the Quebec Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food to pursue research on the impacts of these exotic species. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1993 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Legacy Natural Heritage Areas Program |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will work to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy Program to preserve natural areas as reservoirs of biodiversity and protect the best examples of biodiversity in aquatic and terrestrial sites located in pristine or restored areas of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU strongly urges the Council of Great Lakes Governors to provide regional political leadership necessary to establish and implement the Great Legacy program, a Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin-wide biodiversity conservation strategy; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU urges the states and provinces in the Great Lakes Basin as well as local units of government to take expeditious and appropriate steps to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy program; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be conveyed to the Governors and Premlers of the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Basin and the office of the Council of Great Lakes Governors. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Green Marine - Letter of limited endorsement |
Letter to Marc Gagnon, Director General of Société de développement économique du Saint-Laurent (SODES), offering Great Lakes United's limited endorsement of the Green Marine Program. Great Lakes United supports the Green Marine program and its goals, but cannot endorse Green Marine's objective of "increasing understanding… of the environmental advantages of marine transportation" until such time as the disadvantages of maritime transportation are mitigated through regulation or achievement of Green Marine’s highest goals on a consistent basis. |
Great Lakes United | Oct 22 2007 | Letter, comment, or government submissions |
| Green Vehicle Challenge |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports the goals of the Green Vehicle Challenge, a campaign which challenges vehicle manufacturers to produce vehicles in the near-term that meet a strong green standard, meeting the following criteria:
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that GLU supports a pledge campaign to collect commitments from vehicle consumers and fleet purchasers to purchase green vehicles if made available; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that GLU support policy initiatives, such as financial incentives and extended product responsibility, to promote the goals of the campaign; AND BE IT FlNALLY RESOLVED that GLU supports the development of transition strategy to maintain and create jobs in the Great Lakes region while moving to greener vehicles. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 13 1999 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Ground Level Ozone |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada, Ontario and Quebec to develop a comprehensive strategy to control emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such a strategy should include the following elements: |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1989 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| H2Ontario: A Blueprint for a Comprehensive Water Conservation Strategy |
The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement, signed by Ontario with nine other Great Lakes jurisdictions, requires each state and province in the basin to establish water conservation goals, objectives and programs. Implementation of the recommended actions in this report would position Ontario as a regional leader on conservation. |
POLIS Water Sustainability Project | Aug 13 2009 | Report |
| Harmonization accountability and design for the environment |
Powerpoint presentation from "Shifting the Balance", a workshop exploring Extended Producer Responsibility. This presentation explores EPR from a regulatory perspective. |
Environment Canada | Apr 3 2004 | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) |