Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Titlesort icon Description Organization Date published Content Type
Airborne Toxic Pollutants

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United recommends the following refinements to state, federal and provincial air quality programs:

Sources of non-criteria pollutants should use Best Available Control Technology to reduce and/or eliminate toxic releases.
Probable sources of toxic air emissions should conduct and report emission inventories to identify and quantify potential carcinogens and other toxic chemicals.
Extraordinary releases of toxic pollutants should be immediately reported by the polluter to local health agencies and state'and federalenvironmental protection agencies.

Et Cetera.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Alternative Non-Incineration Destruction Technology for PCBs Other Historic Chlorinated Hazardous Waste

Therefore be it resolved that, in keeping with the virtual elimination goal and zero discharge policy of the GLWQA, Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada and the United States to choose methods for destroying stockpiles of PCBs and other chlorinated hazardous waste that meet the following critera:

1. No incineration of chlorinated hazardous waste
2. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be evaluated on the basis of a 100% destruction efficiency standard
3. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be closed loop systems
4. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not be used as an alternative to banning and stopping the generation of hazardous waste.  These technologies must never be used as an excuse not to meet the IJC's goals of zero discharge. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must only be used for the destruction of historic stockpiles of chlorinated hazardous waste, and must never be used for control of process waste.
5. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not themselves  generate persistent toxic substances or otherwise threaten or endanger human health or the environment
6. All alternative, non-incineration destruction methods should be properly and comprehensively evaluated before applications are approved and their use tightly regulated and controlled by federal, state, provincial and municipal authorities
7. Destruction, transportation and/or handling of these substances shall not pose additional risk to human health and/or the envionment
8. All proposals must pay particular attention to occupational health and safety issues.  Potential risks from occupational exposure should be monitored and fully disclosed to all employees.
9. All communities and workers have a right to fully participate and accept or reject destruction proposals.
10. Potential host communities should be fully consulted before implementation of destruction programmes, with all available data fully disclosed.  Emergency response plans shall be developed with host community input.
11. Destructio nof wates should be paid for by the generator of such wastes.

Great Lakes United Jun 7 1998 Great Lakes United resolution
Alternatives to Dredging

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a study(ies) by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada of the need to continue full-scale, wide-spread dredging, and the availability and usefulness of preventie measures--such as strong watershed management--and environmentally and economically sound alternatives to dredging; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada study be the basis for appropriate action by local, state, federal, and provincial agencies.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Amendments to the US Water Quality Act

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United supports a bill to amend the Clean Water Act to:

  • Require full-scale demonstrations at the five ARCS sites--Buffalo, Ashtabula, Saginaw, Indiana Harbor, and Sheboygan
  • Test more technologies at five new Areas of Concern, possibly including Duluth/Superior, Green Bay, Kalamazoo River, Maumeenoledo, and a binational site like St. Mary's River
  • Provide sediment assessments for all other AOCs with recommendations for management
  • Provide public education and participation before and after the full-scale cleanups
  • Provide technological transfer money to the states to hire sediment coordinators and money to the Environmental
  • Protection Agency, Bureau of Mines, and the Army Corps of Engineers to maintain and train them
  • Sediment source modeling and non-point reduction strategies
  • Make Lake Superior an Outstanding National Resource Water by the year 2000
  • Provide timelines for Great Lakes Initiatives 2 to control non-point pollution from farms and streets; sediments (with standards to protect human, wildlife and aquatic health); air toxics (building on the Great Lakes Waters study); and landfills dumping onto the lakes
  • Funding for the above at $20 million to $25 million per year, and

Be it further resolved that the Canadian government adopt similar measures.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1993 Great Lakes United resolution
An action plan on invasive species

This report outlines five areas in which the Obama administration and 111th Congress can take action to stop invasive species in the United States. It includes: screening intentional imports; preventing inadvertent introductions; funding early detection and response; federal leadership; addressing other funding gaps.

National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species Jan 13 2009 Report
An Introduction to Green Infrastructure

This slideshow from the the Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition identifies opportunities and benefits of green infrastructure practices.

Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition Dec 6 2010 Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint)
An opinion on the governors and premiers’ proposed “Annex Implementing Agreements”

Op-ed dispelling myths surround the Annex Agreements, and explaining why the agreements are a positive step forward for Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River protection.

Great Lakes United; National Wildlife Federation Sep 20 2004 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Annual Losses to Great Lakes Region by Ship-borne Invasive Species at least $200 Million

Preliminary research suggests that the annual cost to the Great Lakes region from invasive species introduced by shipping may be upwards of $200 million dollars a year because invasions limit the ability of the natural ecosystem to support fisheries, raw water uses, and wildlife watching. This factsheet explores some of these first findings.

University of Notre Dame; University of Wyoming Jul 16 2008 Factsheet
Annual Report 2009

Great Lakes United's Annual Report for 2009.

Great Lakes United Nov 20 2010 Report
Asian carp Factsheet: Unraveling the science behind the bighead carp found in Lake Calumet

A new report has been released which attempts to determine the life history of the bighead carp captured on June 22, 2010, in Lake Calumet, just 6 miles from Lake Michigan. Great Lakes United, in partnership with Alliance for the Great Lakes, Healing Our Waters Coalition, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Prairie Rivers Network have produced a factsheet to unravel the science and clear up some of the misconceptions behind the bighead carp found in Lake Calumet.

GLU, HOW, NWF, NRDC, PRN Aug 11 2010 Factsheet
Asian Carp Prevention and Control Act sign on

The undersigned Great Lakes organizations are writing in strong support of bill H.R. 3049/ S.1402 the Asian Carp Prevention and Control Act. We support listing Asian carp (black, bighead and silver) as injurious under the Lacey Act and protecting the Great Lakes by closing a major loophole in the trade regime.

Alliance for the Great Lakes; Biodiversity Project ; Clean Water Action; Eastern Surfing Association - Great Lakes District; Environmental Advocates of New York; Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund; Great Lakes United; Illinois Council of Trout Unlimited; Izaak Walton League – Bush Lake Chapter; Izaak Walton League - Dwight Lydell Chapter; Izaak Walton League - Michigan Division; Izaak Walton League - Minnesota Division; Izaak Walton League - New York Division; Michigan United Conservation Clubs; National Wildlife Federation; Ohio Environmental Council; Nov 28 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Asian Carps at the gateway of the Great Lakes at Chicago

A power point presentation prepared by Mary Muter for the "What to do about Asian Carp in Canada?" webinar. 

Sierra Club Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint)
Ballast Water Control and Management Regulations

The Great Lakes United coalition applauds efforts to amend the Shipping Act to better protect waters of the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence River, and the nation. We stress that such action has been strongly supported by the federal government in the “Government Response to the 4th Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans- Aquatic Invasive Species: Uninvited Guests”. In this response,
the government expressed support for the committee recommendation “that as a matter of priority, standards for the treatment of ballast water be developed, implemented and fully enforced” (Recommendation 6). We encourage the government to demonstrate support by immediately amending, implementing and enforcing changes to the Shipping Act that significantly increase protection of national waters from the ecologically and economically devastating impacts of aquatic invasive species originating from the ballast tanks.

Great Lakes United Aug 23 2005 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Ballast Water Discharge

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United urges that the Governments of Canada and
the United States should:

  • Establish and implement scientifically defensible standards for ballast water discharge that will eliminate the risk of new introductions of exotic species. Accordingly, the governments should follow the International Joint Commission's recommendation in its 91h Biennial Report to move from "studying" ballast water issues to "taking action" to eliminate the risk of new introductions.
  • Require that ships built after 2004 meet these standards
  • Require ballast exchange or accepted alternative by ships built before 2005.
  • Lead a coordinated, vigorous research program to design and retrofit ships to prevent the introduction of new species in the Great Lakes.
  • Not sign international agreements that preempt effective and enhanced protection of the Great Lakes.
Great Lakes United Jun 13 1999 Great Lakes United resolution
Banning Chlorine in the Paper Industry

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon all U.S. and Canadian Jurisdictions on Lake Superior to ban the use of chlorine and chlorine compounds used for de-lignification and bleaching by the paper industry on Lake Superior; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United views this as a litmus test issue in determining whether or not political leaders and regulators are willing to comply with the visionary spirit of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement; AND

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a ban on the use of chlorine and chlorine compounds for de-lignification and bleaching by the paper industry throughout the Great Lakes/ St. Lawrence River Basin, throughout North America and throughout the world.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Bill C-20, Recommendations for Amendments to Bill

A letter to the Standing Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Commons supporting the Canadian Environmental Law Association’s suggested amendments to Bill C-20, regarding nuclear industry liability, the proposed Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act.

Great Lakes United Nov 19 2009 Letter, comment, or government submissions
Calling for the Passage of the United States Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Reform Act

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes legislation is needed to strengthen and revise the Occupational Safety and Heallh Act; AND

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the prompt passage of the Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Reform Act (S. 1622, H.R. 3160).

AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Congress appropriate and allocate adequate funding to fully implement all aspects of the Reform legislation.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Calling on Congress to Reject Trade Agreements that Abrogate US Health Safety Environmental and Labour Laws

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Great Lakes Basin delegation to the Congress to immediately cosponsor H.R. Resolution 246 and Senate Resolution 109 and to assure their passage when brought to a vote, AND

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the President of the United States to initiate and complete negotiations, as part of the Uruguay Round of GATT talks, to make the GAIT compatible with the Marine Mammal Protection Act and other United States health, safety, labor, trade and environmental laws including those laws designed to protect the environment and workers outside the geographic borders of the United States. AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the President of the United States to guarantee that the GATT, US./ Mexico or other trade agreements will not In any way reduce the authority of local and state governments to establish health, safety, labor, environmental, purchasing or procurement laws that the people and their elected representatives have passed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on the President of the United States not to enter Into any lnternational agreement - including GATT and NAFTA - and Congress not to approve any international agreement, that weakens United States' manufacturing Industries and fosters international wage competition that undermines workers living standards.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Canada and the “Annex” Water Agreements

The impact of the Annex agreements for Canada.

Great Lakes United Oct 9 2004 Factsheet
Canada-Ontario Agreement

THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United and other environmental organizations be formally included as full participants in the renegotiation of the Canada-Ontario Agreement.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Canadian Grand Canal Program

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakea United exprasses its outrage that the Grand Canal project could even be seriously considered by Canadian private interest groups and public officials and opposes any study or further considerations of the proposal.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Cancerous Tumours in Fish

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TEAT, Great Lakea United in Annual Meeting assembled May 11-13, 1984 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, urges that Federal, State, and Provincial governments, and duly constituted interstate and international bodies, as appropriate, develop biological indicators as early warning monitoring programs and cooperative tumor Registries to determine the incidence and extent of cancerous tumors in fish and of tumor-causing pollutants in the environment, throughout the United States and Canada.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, State, Provincial and Federal governments and interstate and international bodies, greatly expand their efforts to curtail the pollution of the nation's lakes, rivers and coastal waters by cancer-causing and other toxic chemicals; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Congress amend the FDA's existing statutory authority to require the FDA, when establishing "action levels" and tolerances for fish and ehellfish contaminants, to tailor these limits to specific geographic areas and subpopulations, so as to reflect better the veriations in rates of fish and shellfish consumption within the overall population; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the various jurisdictions should establish uniform and comprehensive alert and notice system fishermen and other fish and shellfieh consumers of the deleterious pollutant levels and/or tumors in fish and in their waters.

Great Lakes United May 13 1983 Great Lakes United resolution
Changes to 1985 Resolution on Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT GREAT LAKES UNITED COOPERATE WITH LOCAL GROUPS TO ACTIVELY OPPOSE THESE SITES AND ALL OTHER SITES WHICH MAY BE PROPOSED WITHIN THE BASIN; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT GREAT LAKES UNITED ACTIVELY PROMOTE AND SUSTAIN PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS DIRECTED TOWARD BROAD-BASED PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON SAFE OPTIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF LOW AND HIGH-LEVEL WASTE; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United board members and staff appear with representatives of local groups to present this resolution.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Chemical policy

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United endorse the principles behind the original proposal for Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals (REACH) legislation in Europe and Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United endorse and advocate the need for the similar legislation in Canada and the United States.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 2004 Great Lakes United resolution
Chlorine Phaseout

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1) That Great Lakes United endorses the recommendations, condusions and substance of the IJC's "Seventh Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality,"
2) That Great Lakes United endorses the proposal to create a multi-organization, Great Lakes Basin campaign to sunset chlorine~ontainingin dustrial feedstocks; that it seeks active and equal participation in this effort from both professional environmental groups and grassroots, community-based groups; and that it will endeavor to provide as much leadership and coordination to this effort as is appropriate and acceptable to other participants in the campaign.
3) That the policy framework that will govern Great Lakes United's participation in a multi-organization campaign to sunset chlorinecontaining industrial feedstocks includes the recommendations, conclusions and substance of: the IJC's fifth, Sixth and Seventh Biennial Reports; the "Chlorine Case Study" submitted to the IJC Virtual Elimination Task Force; and the Citizens' Presentation to the IJC Seventh Biennial Meeting.

Great Lakes United May 5 1994 Great Lakes United resolution