seo php script encoder coklu pagerank sorgulama toplu pagerank sorgulama google pagerank sorgula pagerank sorgulama google sira bulucu google sira bulucu site analiz seo
Information Centre | Great Lakes United / Union Saint-Laurent Grands Lacs
Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Description Organizationsort icon Date published Content Type
Stop Stream Reconfiguration in Great Lakes basin to Expand Habitat for Non-Native Species

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls on fisheries management units around all of the Great Lakes to stop any further removal of the natural features of streams for the purpose of expanding the habitat for non-native species.

Great Lakes United Jun 7 1998 Great Lakes United resolution
US Federal Wetlands Legislation

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes HR 1330 and S 1463 and endorses HR 4255 as an important, fair legislative tool to halt further loss of wetlands in the US.; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United will communicate this position to all U.S. Senators and Representatives from Great Lakes states within the next month.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in Canada

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the government of Ontario to substantially revise and immediately implement the draft Provincial Wetlands Planning Policy Statement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must immediately develop effective wetlands protection legislation and expedite its implementation and enforcement to provide effective protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must undergo a full review of the municipal land use planning and review process to ensure that it provides adequate protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the meantime, all existing statutes and regulations that provide for the protection of all wetlands must be used and enforced, including the Conservation Authorities Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, the Public Lands Act, and the Federal Fisheries Act.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in United States

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Congress of the United States to proceed deliberately in reauthorizing the Clean Water Act, and to oppose the numerous bills that would weaken wetland protection provisions of the Act, particularly Section 404; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Congress explicitly include wetland protection in the Clean Water Act Goal Statement, and that the current regulatory definition of waters of the United
States be amended to presume that all waters and wetlands are susceptible to use in interstate commerce; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the list of activities regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act be expanded to include all activities that may damage or degrade wetlands such as draining, dredging, channelizing, flooding, placement of floating and piling supported structures; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 401 should be amended to expressly broaden the protections provided by this section to include wetlands, and direct states to address physical and biological alterations of aquatic areas, as well as chemical pollution; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Nationwide permit program should be substantially revised to control ongoing cumulative wetland losses, specifically to (1) eliminate Nationwide General Permit No. 26, (2) comply with Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines, and (3) prohibit using multiple general permits to avoid the acreage limitations of other general or individual permit requirements.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetlands Protection

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United:

- opposes any attempts to reduce the scope of the Section 404 program or the protections now given wetlands by the U.S. EPAss 404(b) (1) Guidelines;
- supports reforms of existing federal farm programe to remove subsidies for production of taurplua crops on wetlande drained and cleared after 1981;
- recommends the elimination of federal, state, and provincial tax incentives for draining and clearing of wetlande.

 

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Above Ground Storage of Radioactive Waste

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls on the Federal Cabinet to immediately overrule the Minister's decision and direct her to make preparations for a full, independent panel environmental assessment hearing to fully address the health and social concerns expressed by the public.

Great Lakes United Jun 13 1999 Great Lakes United resolution
Adequate Enforcement and Implementation of Environmental Laws

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United work work with its member organizations at the state, provincial and national levels to:

1. assess and analyze the staffing and funding needs of state, national and international programs that should operate to protect the Great Lakes from pollution and mismanagement,
2. assess and analyze the degree to which those staffing and funding neede are being met, and the causes of any deficiencies that are discovered,
3. publicize deficiencies and advocate in appropriate forums for adequate staffing and funding. Great Lakes United should work to establish funding mechaniams with long-term stability, such as those derived from surveillance and monitoring fees assessed as part of the permitting procedure,
4. insure that environmental agencies and attorney generale' offices aggressively pursue enforcement actions against violaters of environmental statutes and regulations affecting the Great Lakes,
5. advocate the inclusions of broad citizen suit sections in state, provincial and national environmental statutes, which will allow citizens to serve as "private attorney generals," supplementing governmental enforcement efforts.

Great Lakes United May 5 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Alternative Non-Incineration Destruction Technology for PCBs Other Historic Chlorinated Hazardous Waste

Therefore be it resolved that, in keeping with the virtual elimination goal and zero discharge policy of the GLWQA, Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada and the United States to choose methods for destroying stockpiles of PCBs and other chlorinated hazardous waste that meet the following critera:

1. No incineration of chlorinated hazardous waste
2. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be evaluated on the basis of a 100% destruction efficiency standard
3. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be closed loop systems
4. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not be used as an alternative to banning and stopping the generation of hazardous waste.  These technologies must never be used as an excuse not to meet the IJC's goals of zero discharge. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must only be used for the destruction of historic stockpiles of chlorinated hazardous waste, and must never be used for control of process waste.
5. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not themselves  generate persistent toxic substances or otherwise threaten or endanger human health or the environment
6. All alternative, non-incineration destruction methods should be properly and comprehensively evaluated before applications are approved and their use tightly regulated and controlled by federal, state, provincial and municipal authorities
7. Destruction, transportation and/or handling of these substances shall not pose additional risk to human health and/or the envionment
8. All proposals must pay particular attention to occupational health and safety issues.  Potential risks from occupational exposure should be monitored and fully disclosed to all employees.
9. All communities and workers have a right to fully participate and accept or reject destruction proposals.
10. Potential host communities should be fully consulted before implementation of destruction programmes, with all available data fully disclosed.  Emergency response plans shall be developed with host community input.
11. Destructio nof wates should be paid for by the generator of such wastes.

Great Lakes United Jun 7 1998 Great Lakes United resolution
Changes to 1985 Resolution on Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT GREAT LAKES UNITED COOPERATE WITH LOCAL GROUPS TO ACTIVELY OPPOSE THESE SITES AND ALL OTHER SITES WHICH MAY BE PROPOSED WITHIN THE BASIN; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT GREAT LAKES UNITED ACTIVELY PROMOTE AND SUSTAIN PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS DIRECTED TOWARD BROAD-BASED PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON SAFE OPTIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF LOW AND HIGH-LEVEL WASTE; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United board members and staff appear with representatives of local groups to present this resolution.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Chlorine Phaseout

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1) That Great Lakes United endorses the recommendations, condusions and substance of the IJC's "Seventh Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality,"
2) That Great Lakes United endorses the proposal to create a multi-organization, Great Lakes Basin campaign to sunset chlorine~ontainingin dustrial feedstocks; that it seeks active and equal participation in this effort from both professional environmental groups and grassroots, community-based groups; and that it will endeavor to provide as much leadership and coordination to this effort as is appropriate and acceptable to other participants in the campaign.
3) That the policy framework that will govern Great Lakes United's participation in a multi-organization campaign to sunset chlorinecontaining industrial feedstocks includes the recommendations, conclusions and substance of: the IJC's fifth, Sixth and Seventh Biennial Reports; the "Chlorine Case Study" submitted to the IJC Virtual Elimination Task Force; and the Citizens' Presentation to the IJC Seventh Biennial Meeting.

Great Lakes United May 5 1994 Great Lakes United resolution
Development of a Basin Wide Strategy to Complete and Fully Implement Remedial Action Plans

THEREFORE Great Lakes United urges that the US Environmental Protection Agency and Environment Canada reconfirm their commitment to clean up the AOCs, and that the US EPA and Environment Canada commit the necessary federal dollars to complete and implement the RAPs;

That the federal governments recognize that the same economic and corporate forces that led to degradation of water quality in the AOCs and also caused significant damage to the surrounding communities so that the US EPA and Environment Canada target substantial resources for clean up and sustainable redevelopment of surrounding communities, including assessment of health impacts and support health services;

That to request their commitment to full public participation in all aspects of the RAPs, the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada should provide funding for paid independent facilitators and community organizers, as well as resources tb facilitate public participation, such as travel funding and childcare;

That the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada provide funding tor the independent technical advisors and consultants to be selected to be selected by the public advisory committees;

That the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada enter negotiations with Great Lakes United and other environmental public interest groups to develop a basin-wide strategy to complrte and fully implement the Remedial Action Plans.

Great Lakes United Jun 9 1996 Great Lakes United resolution
Fund Raising Purchases

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that all GLUE fundraising purchases/items (teeshirts, calendars, stationery etc.) shall be ecologically fiiendly products (i.e. unbleached teeshirts and chlorine free, recycled paper products).

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, whenever possible, all items shall be union-made.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1995 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Toxic Agreements

THBREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United supports promulgation and implementation of the Greet Lakee Toxic Substances Control Agreement;

BE IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement in the implementation and review of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement is essential to the control of toxic pollutants entering the Great Lakes System;

BB IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement is the design of any Basin-wide agreement including, at a minimum, consultation and responce as provided for in the agreement, is essential to the control of toxic pollutants; and

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that the success of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement in controlling the entry of toxic pollutants into the Great Lakes system is dependent upon continuing public involvement.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Green Vehicle Challenge

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports the goals of the Green Vehicle Challenge, a campaign which challenges vehicle manufacturers to produce vehicles in the near-term that meet a strong green standard, meeting the following criteria:

  • Fuel Efficiency, 1.5 time s the fleet average for that vehicle's class
  • Tailpipe Emissions, meeting California's ULEV standard's or better
  • Clean Manufacturing, that includes best-in-class paintinglcoating, elimination of
  • substances of concern and design for recyclability/recycled content

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that GLU supports a pledge campaign to collect commitments from vehicle consumers and fleet purchasers to purchase green vehicles if made available;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that GLU support policy initiatives, such as financial incentives and extended product responsibility, to promote the goals of the campaign;

AND BE IT FlNALLY RESOLVED that GLU supports the development of transition strategy to maintain and create jobs in the Great Lakes region while moving to greener vehicles.

Great Lakes United Jun 13 1999 Great Lakes United resolution
Hazardous and Toxic Substances

BE IT RBSOLVED THAT Great Lakes United should press state, provincial and federal Governments to provide for:

A. Long term adequate funding of research into the transport, fate and toxicity of substancee entering the Great Lakes from point and non-point sources with special attention to the need for long term adequate funding for the BPA Grosse Ile and Duluth Laboratories and NOAA GLERL Laboratory in Ann Arbor.

B. Increased funding for monitoring, investigation and enforcement to regulate the point and non-point source discharges of toxic pollutants in general and persistent, bioaccumulative and potentially carcinogenic substances like dioxin in particular.

C. Increased public access to relevant information.

D. Honoring Great Lakee Water Quality Agreement commitments.

BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United should inventory and rank toxic and hazardous substance problems in the Great Lakes Basin.

BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United press for etricter controls on the point and non-point source discharges of toxic substances into the Great Lakes Ecosystem.

BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United promote alternatives to the generation and discharge of toxic and hazardous substances, with special focus on the need for the development of a comprehensive resource recovery and waste management plan within the Great Lakes Basin.

BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United create a centralized repository/clearing-house for information relevant to the goals and objectives of Great Lakes United and its member organizations, readily accessible to its members.

Great Lakes United May 7 1983 Great Lakes United resolution
Hazardous Waste Management

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the following policies:

1. Stringent emissions standards should be developed in each government jurisdiction consistent with the 1987 Amendments to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement; as stated in the Agreement, these standards should be based on the ability of substances, "singly or in synergistic or additive combination with another substances, to have an acute or chronic toxic effects on aquatic, animal or human life."

2. Best Available Technology, regardless of cost, should be the basis for licensing hazardous waste conversion facilities.

3. If the Best Available Technology cannot meet stringent health and environment-based stnadards, the waste conversion facility should not be built.

4. The size of waste conversion facilities should be built on such a scale that once waste reduction and source se aration occur, the facilities do not require additional sources of hazar i ous waste to maintain them.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the following policies:
1. No hazardous wastes (whether pretreated or not) should be placed in landfills.
2. Above-ground storage of pretreated hazardous wastes under carefully controlled situations should be substituted for below-ground landfills.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
IJC Recommendation on Phase of Chlorine and Its Compounds

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United:

  • Endorses the recommendations of the International Joint Commission's Sixth Biennial Report pertaining to toxic substances
  • Urges the Virtual Elimination Task Force of the International Joint Commission to adopt the background report by T. Muir et al. titled: "Case Study: Application of a Virtual Elimination Strategy to an Industrial Feedstock Chemical-Chlorine" (hereinafter referred to as the "chlorine case study")
  • Urges the inclusion of the chlorine case study as part of the main report of the Virtual Elimination Task Force
  • Recommends that the governments work to apply and implement the methodology, findings, and recommendations in the chlorine case study, and
  • Circulates copies of this resolution and the chlorine case study to the members of the Great Lakes United and urges them to endorse the case study
Great Lakes United Jun 6 1993 Great Lakes United resolution
Municipal Waste Management

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the following policies:

1. Each government jurisdiction shall set up programmes to remove household and commercial/industrial hazardous wastes, as well as infectious wastes, from the municipal solid waste stream.

2a. The governments within the Great Lakes Basin shall set a minimum 50% target for removal of household and commercia1 industria1 materials from the municipal solid waste stream through reduction, reuse and recycling methods, including composting, within the next ten years.

2b. State and provincial governments shall establish programs to assist in the development of markets for used oil, glass, paper, metal tires and other materials.  Procurement of products made from these materials shall be encouraged wherever possible.

2c. The local, state/provincial and federal governments shall train appropriate personnel to oversee, implement and coordinate the above programs.

3. Within the next three years, each Province and State within the Great Lakes Basin shall ass legislation requiring re cling of household and industrial / commercial wastes in order to achieve the targets in Section 2.

4a. The appropriate government jurisdictions shall pass packaging legislation so as to reduce excess and non-reusable and non-recyclable packaging and to promote recyclable packaging.

4b. Plastic packagin material shall be labelled as to composition so as to enhance recyclability.

5a. A programme to develop, institute and reach the minimum 50% target for reduction, reuse and recycling of wastes must be attained before new landfills and incinerators are considered for wastes.

5b. Recyclable materials shall be exempt from any flow control restrictions.

6. The government jurisdictions shall provide adequate funding through the budgetary process to ensure that the above actions can be implemented.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Municipal Waste Management

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the following policies:

1. Each government jurisdiction shall set up programmes to remove household and commercial/industrial hazardous wastes, as well as infectious wastes, from the municipal solid waste stream.

2a. The governments within the Great Lakes Basin shall set a minimum 50% target for removal of household and commercia1 industria1 materials from the municipal solid waste stream through reduction, reuse and recycling methods, including composting, within the next ten years.

2b. State and provincial governments shall establish programs to assist in the development of markets for used oil, glass, paper, metal tires and other materials.  Procurement of products made from these materials shall be encouraged wherever possible.

2c. The local, state/provincial and federal governments shall train appropriate personnel to oversee, implement and coordinate the above programs.

3. Within the next three years, each Province and State within the Great Lakes Basin shall ass legislation requiring re cling of household and industrial / commercial wastes in order to achieve the targets in Section 2.

4a. The appropriate government jurisdictions shall pass packaging legislation so as to reduce excess and non-reusable and non-recyclable packaging and to promote recyclable packaging.

4b. Plastic packagin material shall be labelled as to composition so as to enhance recyclability.

5a. A programme to develop, institute and reach the minimum 50% target for reduction, reuse and recycling of wastes must be attained before new landfills and incinerators are considered for wastes.

5b. Recyclable materials shall be exempt from any flow control restrictions.

6. The government jurisdictions shall provide adequate funding through the budgetary process to ensure that the above actions can be implemented.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Need for Strong Medical Waste Regulations

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United:

  • Urges the International Joint Commission to advocate strongly with the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada to adopt strong rules which eliminate the discharge of persistent toxic compounds from medical waste incinerators,
  • Urges the International Joint Commission to advocate for and work with the health care industry to adopt a materials policy which will lead to zero discharge of persistent toxic compounds, and
  • Urges the U.S. EPA to adopt strong rules to eliminate the formation of dioxin and the release of mercury by medical waste incinerators, and to encourage the health care industry to adopt a materials policy which will lead to zero discharge of persistent toxic substances.
Great Lakes United May 31 1997 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United make the reclassification of Class C low level radioactive waste to high level a top priority issue.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
NUCLEAR WASTES AND NUCLEAR PLANTS AROUND THE GREAT LAKES BASIN

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United includes all radioactive wates in the definition of hazardous or toxic wastes; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes new construction, and/or completion/start-up of nuclear power plants within the Great Lakes Basin, and that those plants already built within the Basin be phased out as soon as possible.

Great Lakes United Jun 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Ontario Waste Management Corporation

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes Untted urges the Ontario Government to drop its plans to build a hazardous waste incinerator and landfill;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Ontario Government to divert the money it is now putting into the OWMC lnto waste reduction activities.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Permanent Solution to Toxic Landfills

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United calls upon the Environrental Protection Agency to replace their general policy for remedial action at abondoned hazardous waste sites in the Great Lakes Basin with a policy which emphasises permanent solutions to these problems through:
1. source removal of mobile wamtes in an environmentally sound and humanly safe manner using Best Available Technology,
2. clean-up technologies and remedial alternatives that lead to effective waste destruction employing Best Available Technology.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
seo php script encoder coklu pagerank sorgulama toplu pagerank sorgulama google pagerank sorgula pagerank sorgulama google sira bulucu google sira bulucu site analiz seo
seo php script encoder coklu pagerank sorgulama toplu pagerank sorgulama google pagerank sorgula pagerank sorgulama google sira bulucu google sira bulucu site analiz seo