seo php script encoder coklu pagerank sorgulama toplu pagerank sorgulama google pagerank sorgula pagerank sorgulama google sira bulucu google sira bulucu site analiz seo
Information Centre | Great Lakes United / Union Saint-Laurent Grands Lacs
Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Descriptionsort icon Organization Date published Content Type
Alternative Non-Incineration Destruction Technology for PCBs Other Historic Chlorinated Hazardous Waste

Therefore be it resolved that, in keeping with the virtual elimination goal and zero discharge policy of the GLWQA, Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada and the United States to choose methods for destroying stockpiles of PCBs and other chlorinated hazardous waste that meet the following critera:

1. No incineration of chlorinated hazardous waste
2. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be evaluated on the basis of a 100% destruction efficiency standard
3. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be closed loop systems
4. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not be used as an alternative to banning and stopping the generation of hazardous waste.  These technologies must never be used as an excuse not to meet the IJC's goals of zero discharge. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must only be used for the destruction of historic stockpiles of chlorinated hazardous waste, and must never be used for control of process waste.
5. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not themselves  generate persistent toxic substances or otherwise threaten or endanger human health or the environment
6. All alternative, non-incineration destruction methods should be properly and comprehensively evaluated before applications are approved and their use tightly regulated and controlled by federal, state, provincial and municipal authorities
7. Destruction, transportation and/or handling of these substances shall not pose additional risk to human health and/or the envionment
8. All proposals must pay particular attention to occupational health and safety issues.  Potential risks from occupational exposure should be monitored and fully disclosed to all employees.
9. All communities and workers have a right to fully participate and accept or reject destruction proposals.
10. Potential host communities should be fully consulted before implementation of destruction programmes, with all available data fully disclosed.  Emergency response plans shall be developed with host community input.
11. Destructio nof wates should be paid for by the generator of such wastes.

Great Lakes United Jun 7 1998 Great Lakes United resolution
Energy Development and Distribution

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. Energy conservation programs be sustained, introduced or stepped up to stabilize or even reduce consumption levels, thereby reducing ecologically harmful emissions, and/or ecological risks associated with storage and transportation of spent fuels from nuclear
reactors; and

2. A policy of industrial cogeneration be implenented in industrial planning to allow multiple uses of energy sources for greatest efficiency; and

3. Pricing structures be reformed so as to reward conservation vation in energy use, rather than penalize restraint of uee; and

4. Research seek an optimum combination of energy resources for ecosystem protection, not just coat efficiency; and

5. We accelerate the decommissioning of problematic nuclear facilities; and

6. We pursue planning for maximizing local consumption'of locally generated energy to minimize the proliferation of land use for distribution corridors and terminate leases on abandoned corridors; and

7. Finally, we sustain public education programs directed toward approval and support of the above.

Great Lakes United May 13 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Levels Flows and Diversions

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, Great Lakes United requests that the Governments of the United States and Canada send a reference to the International Joint Commission requesting them to monitor consumptive use of Great Lakes water and study possible control measures (along with
their impacts) for managing consumptive uses of Great Lakes water; and

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, such a study include no commitment to future diversion of Great Lakes waters out of the area Lakes Basin.

Great Lakes United May 7 1983 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Wetlands

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a new Annex specifically addressing wetlands losses and their effects on the integrity of the Great Lakes ecosystem be added to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement at its next revision; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for the wetland base in the Great Lakes Basin to be restored, the U,S, and Canadian federal governments should immediately declare the Great Lakes Basin a "demonstration region" for a "Net Gain" in wetland functions and quantity.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste Transport in the Great Lakes Basin

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United actively promote new federal, state, provincial and local regulations to suspend the transportation of high level nuclear waste within the Great Lakes Basin until such a time that the above concerns are fully addressed and the safe transport of the fuel can be assured.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Water Levels

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United affirm its opposition to construction of new water level control structures in the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the plan of study for Phase 2 of, the IJC water level study emphasize identifying responses to water level fluctuations that do not require structural controls. These include approaches such as coastal zone hazard planning and other land use management approaches.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Chlorofluorocarbons in the Atmosphere

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United applauds the signing of the Montreal Accord for ozone protection; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that because the Montreal Accord's call for a 20% CFC (Chlorofluorocarbons) reduction will not be sufficient to protect the ozone layer, Great Lakes United encourages all CFC-producing countries to romptly develop CFC substitutes and to work towards the worldwide phaseout of & FCs.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Islands and Shoals

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United call on State and Provincial jurisdictions to call for a moratorium on further development of Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River islands until a scientific inventory of lslands and shoals and a plannlng vision are completed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU request the U.S. and Canadian Nature Conservancies, the Center for the Great Lakes and local land trusts to pursue a protective strategy towards islands and shoals basin-wide, and that such private not-for-profits in conjunction with governments further promulgate an approach to development that protects the natural resources, open space, and scenic and heritage value of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Banning Chlorine in the Paper Industry

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon all U.S. and Canadian Jurisdictions on Lake Superior to ban the use of chlorine and chlorine compounds used for de-lignification and bleaching by the paper industry on Lake Superior; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United views this as a litmus test issue in determining whether or not political leaders and regulators are willing to comply with the visionary spirit of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement; AND

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a ban on the use of chlorine and chlorine compounds for de-lignification and bleaching by the paper industry throughout the Great Lakes/ St. Lawrence River Basin, throughout North America and throughout the world.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in United States

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Congress of the United States to proceed deliberately in reauthorizing the Clean Water Act, and to oppose the numerous bills that would weaken wetland protection provisions of the Act, particularly Section 404; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Congress explicitly include wetland protection in the Clean Water Act Goal Statement, and that the current regulatory definition of waters of the United
States be amended to presume that all waters and wetlands are susceptible to use in interstate commerce; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the list of activities regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act be expanded to include all activities that may damage or degrade wetlands such as draining, dredging, channelizing, flooding, placement of floating and piling supported structures; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 401 should be amended to expressly broaden the protections provided by this section to include wetlands, and direct states to address physical and biological alterations of aquatic areas, as well as chemical pollution; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Nationwide permit program should be substantially revised to control ongoing cumulative wetland losses, specifically to (1) eliminate Nationwide General Permit No. 26, (2) comply with Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines, and (3) prohibit using multiple general permits to avoid the acreage limitations of other general or individual permit requirements.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Lake Superior

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the governments of the United States, Canada, Ontario, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota to immediately implement a moratorium for new or increased discharges of persistent toxic pollutants to Lake Superior until the International Joint Commission recommendation has been implemented; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments use their statutory authority to designate Lake Superior as an Outstanding National Resource Water (ONRW) for persistent toxic pollutants, the highest protective status given to water bodies under the U.S. Clean Water Act, and that the Lake be given a similar protective status under Canadian law; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments immediately schedule a phase out of the use of chlorine in the pulp and paper industry to eliminate the major point source of persistent toxic pollutants to Lake Superior; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the governments take other appropriate action to implement the International Joint Commission recommendation for Lake Superior as a demonstration area.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Calling on Congress to Reject Trade Agreements that Abrogate US Health Safety Environmental and Labour Laws

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Great Lakes Basin delegation to the Congress to immediately cosponsor H.R. Resolution 246 and Senate Resolution 109 and to assure their passage when brought to a vote, AND

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the President of the United States to initiate and complete negotiations, as part of the Uruguay Round of GATT talks, to make the GAIT compatible with the Marine Mammal Protection Act and other United States health, safety, labor, trade and environmental laws including those laws designed to protect the environment and workers outside the geographic borders of the United States. AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the President of the United States to guarantee that the GATT, US./ Mexico or other trade agreements will not In any way reduce the authority of local and state governments to establish health, safety, labor, environmental, purchasing or procurement laws that the people and their elected representatives have passed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on the President of the United States not to enter Into any lnternational agreement - including GATT and NAFTA - and Congress not to approve any international agreement, that weakens United States' manufacturing Industries and fosters international wage competition that undermines workers living standards.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Continuing Government Support of Beluga Whale Research in the St. Lawrence

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United contact the Canadian Minister of the Environment and Members of Parliament to request the continued funding from the Wildlife Protection Fund for Pierre Beland's critical research and matching funds he sought from the appropriate U.S. Federal Agency t o recognize their binational responsibility to protect this endangered species.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Labour and Environment

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great lakes United create the LABOR AND ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE to develop strategies to support efforts establishing programs at the local, state and provincial levels to compensate and retrain workers so affected; in addition, to support labor participation in decisions regarding process changes and production reorganization to achieve zero discharge; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Task Force will work to strengthen and build the alliance between labor and environmental organizations to achieve our common goals.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United formally endorses the recommendations in Unfulfilled Promises; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United member organizations develop an implementation strategy for the findin s of Unfulfilled Promises, and promote adequate public participation in review o f the Agreement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU focus priority attention on the virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances and zero discharge. The Water Quality Task Force, in cooperation with member groups and staff, shall develop a definition of zero discharge, suggest alternatives for persistent toxic substances and develop an action plan to advocate the changes. GLU also advocates the inclusion in any amended GLWQA of a commitment by the two countries to develop timetables to achieve virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances in the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the implementation of zero discharge goals through state and provincial legislative/regulatory initiatives such as the proposed Safe Drinking ater Act in New Yor state; AND

FINALLY BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these state/provincial initiatives have estabfished timetables for implementation.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Support Basin Business

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United make it a policy to look first at purchasing, where possible, environmentally sound products that are produced in unionized shops within the Great Lakes Basin in order to promote a sustainable economy in the Basin.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Land Use

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United objects to the City of Erie's proposed zoning regulations. GLU advocates amendments to the proposed zoning package which adhere to the following guidelines:
1. The zoning should protect the environmental health of Presque Isle Harbor.
2. The zoning should guarantee maximum public access.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU requests that the U.S. EPA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the federal Coastal Zone Management Program administrators, and others, as deemed appropriate, investigate Pennsylvania's implementation of the Coastal Zone Managment Program in Erie; and

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU petition the International Joint Commission to add Presque Isle Bay, Harbor, and the area surrounding Erie , Pennsylvania , to the IJC's list of Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Ohio River Canal Study Proposal in Congress

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes B.R. 1519 or any such legislation to fund the atudy of a Lake Erie-Ohio River Canal Project; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is inappropriate to fund studies on far-reaching projecta inconsistent with the Great Lakes Charter when other federal qualitative and quantitative research prograre for the Greet Lakes Basin are being crippled in the Halls of Congrees.

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Michigan DNR

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the abolishment of the citizen boards and commission.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition Congress to Increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to Inflation since 1980; these programs Include, but are not limited to:

1. NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2. EPA's Research Stations at Grosse lle, Michigan and Duluth, Minnesota;
3. Great Lakes research programs funded through the United States Commerce Department's Sea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region;
4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Fisheries Center - Great Lakes, Arbor, Michigan;
5. NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to:

1. NOAAJs Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2. EPA's Research Stations at Grosse lie, Michigan and Duluth. Minnesota;
3. Great Lakes research programs funded through the United States Commerce Department's Sea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region;
4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Fisheries Center - Great Lakes, Arbor, Michigan
5. NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
Winter Navigation

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its long-standing opposition to Winter Navigation; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that our opposition be one of Great Lakes United's highest priorities.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Trail Creek Indiana

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United strongly urges the International Joint Commission to recommend, and the U.S. and Canadian federal governments to designate, Trail Creek, Indiana as an Area of Concern.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Alternatives to Dredging

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a study(ies) by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada of the need to continue full-scale, wide-spread dredging, and the availability and usefulness of preventie measures--such as strong watershed management--and environmentally and economically sound alternatives to dredging; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada study be the basis for appropriate action by local, state, federal, and provincial agencies.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Adding Grand Island to the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports acquisition of Grand Island by the National Park Service as an addition to Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore and inclusion of Grand Island in the Coastal Barrier Resources System if control of hunting, fishing, trapping, and related activities remains with the State of Michigan.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the event the National Park Service does not acquire Grand Island as an addition to the Pictured Rock National Lakeshore that the USDA Forest Service would be the preferred alternative federal agency to acquire ownership and management responsibilities of Grand Island for these purposes.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
seo php script encoder coklu pagerank sorgulama toplu pagerank sorgulama google pagerank sorgula pagerank sorgulama google sira bulucu google sira bulucu site analiz seo
seo php script encoder coklu pagerank sorgulama toplu pagerank sorgulama google pagerank sorgula pagerank sorgulama google sira bulucu google sira bulucu site analiz seo