Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Description Organization Date publishedsort icon Content Type
Chlorofluorocarbons in the Atmosphere

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United applauds the signing of the Montreal Accord for ozone protection; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that because the Montreal Accord's call for a 20% CFC (Chlorofluorocarbons) reduction will not be sufficient to protect the ozone layer, Great Lakes United encourages all CFC-producing countries to romptly develop CFC substitutes and to work towards the worldwide phaseout of & FCs.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Transboundary Air Quality

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the creation of a Detroit-Windsor Air Pollution Board, with full public articipation to set standards for air, and water, and leachate in the transboun ary Great Lakes area; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that both federal, state, and provincial governments fund a major programme of public and consumer education, and increased support be given to localized and private efforts to reduce the use of toxic substances and to control their storage and disposal along with an emphasis on recycling as called for in the IJC Third Biennial Report; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Ontario's new regulation 308 include specific recommendations for dealing with the effects of transboundary air pollution on the ambient air quality standard for Windsor and include an Ambient Air Quality Report similar to the industrial discharge reports for Ontario waterways.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Alternatives to Dredging

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a study(ies) by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada of the need to continue full-scale, wide-spread dredging, and the availability and usefulness of preventie measures--such as strong watershed management--and environmentally and economically sound alternatives to dredging; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada study be the basis for appropriate action by local, state, federal, and provincial agencies.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Contaminated Sediments and Sediment Criteria

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that regulations with uniform numerical criteria common to both federal jurisdictions be established to determine the extent of contamination in sediment and therefore the options for disposal and treatment of that sediment; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such criteria not only measure concentrations of contaminants in sediment, but that they also take into account the cumulative effects of multiple contaminant(s), the organic content and sediment size distribution, the movement (partitioning) of contaminants between sediment and water column, and chronic as well as acute effects on biota (bioaccummulation); AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that citizens be included in the decision-making process for developing said criteria as well as in reviewing all drafts of regulations including the final criteria.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Creation of a National Program for Contaminated Sediments

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports an Aquafund concept in the United States and Canada to fund the im lementation of research programs, prioritization and mapping of toxic hot spots, 2 emonstration cleanup projects, and ermanent cleanup activities for contaminated sediment areas in our waterways; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such a concept or program, established in each country, must address the coordination of air, water, and land use issues on a watershed basis; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that time is of the essence in developing practical funding mechanisms for such programs and that such mechanisms be devised by the two federal governments in consultation with Great Lakes United, its member organizations, and other interested citizens' groups; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no such funding mechanism be approved that includes any scheme that could be interpreted as a "license to pollute" by direct dischargers; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that positive incentives to prevent future pollution and to encourage waste minimization and source reduction be built into any legislation or regulation; AND

Et Cetera

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Regulations for Confined Disposal Facilities for Contaminated Sediments

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that there be an immediate ban on the construction of all and any new in water diked disposal facilities in the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all existing confined disposal facilities undergo a detailed review and evaluation to determine the current integrity of their barriers, such review to be carried out by appropriate government agencies in each country; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a protocol for ongoing monitoring for leaking, discharges, and progress impacts on the surrounding ecosystem be established by December, 1988 for all currently existing confined disposal facilities and that monitoring be implemented at all sites immediately, even as the protocals are being established; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an action plan for the removal and/or closure and remediation of all confined disposal facilities be developed and that remediation of confined disposal facilities in Areas of Concern be incorporated into the Remedial Action Plan for those Areas, and that this be done with the objective of determining ecosystem-positive methods of final treatment of the contiaminated sediments involved; AND

Et Cetera.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Restrictions for Dredging Activities of Contaminated Sediments

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that in such areas dredging activities be regulated as point sources of contamination, with permits required to ensure that environmental safeguards are in place and that best available dredging technology is used; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, where the dredgin activities of one nation may adversely affect the ecosystem of another, or where d redging activities are carried out in international waters, a binational committee, including citizens as well as government representatives, be appointed by the two federal governments; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, until such standards are developed, state of the art technologies minimizing environmental impacts for dredging equipment should be used on a site-specific basis; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that new federal appropriations be sought to develop new advanced dredging technologies; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that until comprehensive environmental impact and assessment processes are in place for contaminated sediments, a moratorium on open-water dumping should be instituted.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Adding Grand Island to the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports acquisition of Grand Island by the National Park Service as an addition to Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore and inclusion of Grand Island in the Coastal Barrier Resources System if control of hunting, fishing, trapping, and related activities remains with the State of Michigan.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the event the National Park Service does not acquire Grand Island as an addition to the Pictured Rock National Lakeshore that the USDA Forest Service would be the preferred alternative federal agency to acquire ownership and management responsibilities of Grand Island for these purposes.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United make the reclassification of Class C low level radioactive waste to high level a top priority issue.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Municipal Waste Management

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the following policies:

1. Each government jurisdiction shall set up programmes to remove household and commercial/industrial hazardous wastes, as well as infectious wastes, from the municipal solid waste stream.

2a. The governments within the Great Lakes Basin shall set a minimum 50% target for removal of household and commercia1 industria1 materials from the municipal solid waste stream through reduction, reuse and recycling methods, including composting, within the next ten years.

2b. State and provincial governments shall establish programs to assist in the development of markets for used oil, glass, paper, metal tires and other materials.  Procurement of products made from these materials shall be encouraged wherever possible.

2c. The local, state/provincial and federal governments shall train appropriate personnel to oversee, implement and coordinate the above programs.

3. Within the next three years, each Province and State within the Great Lakes Basin shall ass legislation requiring re cling of household and industrial / commercial wastes in order to achieve the targets in Section 2.

4a. The appropriate government jurisdictions shall pass packaging legislation so as to reduce excess and non-reusable and non-recyclable packaging and to promote recyclable packaging.

4b. Plastic packagin material shall be labelled as to composition so as to enhance recyclability.

5a. A programme to develop, institute and reach the minimum 50% target for reduction, reuse and recycling of wastes must be attained before new landfills and incinerators are considered for wastes.

5b. Recyclable materials shall be exempt from any flow control restrictions.

6. The government jurisdictions shall provide adequate funding through the budgetary process to ensure that the above actions can be implemented.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Expansion of the Costal Barrier Resources System to Underdeveloped Coastal Areas Along the Great Lakes

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the United States Congress to act quickly to extend the protective Coastal Barrier Resources System to undeveloped, eligible coastal barriers, such as wetlands, bluffs, dunes, and beaches, along the Great Lakes.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Creation of Two-headed River National Park

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United supports the establishment of the Two-Hearted River National Park if control of hunting, fishing, trapping, and related activities remains with the State of Michigan.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Introduction of Exotic Species Through Ship Ballast

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports the development and implementation of research and regulation to stop the introduction of exotic species into the Great Lakes Basin by ships ballast waters.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Adoption of Proposed Toxic Water Pollution Control Regulations in Wisconsin

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board and the members of the Wisconsin legislature to remedy the deficiencies described above by amending the draft regulations proposed by the WDNR to include the improvements recommended by Great Lakes United and the other groups participating in the Wisconsin Campaign for Clean Water and then to adopt them in final form; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to the Governor of Wisconsin, the Secretary of the WDNR, members of the appropriate committees of the Wisconsin legislature, and all seven members of the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Winter Navigation

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its long-standing opposition to Winter Navigation; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that our opposition be one of Great Lakes United's highest priorities.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
New York State's Great Lakes Program

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support a legislative proposal to create a Great Lakes Advisory Council with representatives from conservation/environmental groups, private sector overnment agencies, and the legislature to assist in the implementation of New York's Great Lakes Agenda and to advise the Governor and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on Great Lakes issues; AND

FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports full membership of New York State and Pennsylvania in the Council of Great Lakes Governors and supports a close cooperative relationship with the Premiers of Ontario and Quebec.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Criteria for Reviewing Remedial Action Plans

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United publicly circulate the followin criteria for reviewing RAPs to the IJC, the government agencies responsible for preparing the plans, member groups and others interested and involved with RAPs:

1. Was the public participation process used in the preparation of the remedial action plan adequate? If not, what additional actions are necessary?
2. Was the public involved in the identification of impaired uses and problems?
3. Was the public involved in choosing preferred remedial strategies?
4. How will the public be involved in ensuring the implementation of the remedial action plan?
5. How will the public be involved in decisions made regarding the completion of remedial actions and the decision that all beneficial uses have been restored?
6. Were the public's concerns and recommendations adequately responded to?
7. Are the remediation objectives clear and consistent with the general and specific objectives of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement?
8. Have the geographic boundaries of the area of concern been appropriately and clearly defined?
9. In cases where the Area of Concern crosses an international border, has an international RAP been prepared?
10. Have impaired uses (both human and non-human) been identified?
11. Have the problems causing the impaired uses been described well? Is the data adequate to do this?
12. If the data is not adequate, what additional studies are necessary? Who will do them? When? Funding?
13. Have the contributions of each point and non-point source been assessed and compared to each other to determine the relative source loading?
14. Have the adverse effects on all ecosystem components been identified?
15. Have all appropriate remedial strategies been described?
16. Have the remedial strate ies been described completely, including any negative effects that could result from their implementation?
17. Has the choice for preferred remedial strategies been based on ecological Found? (i .e. the preferred strategies shoul be effective but not further disrupt the ecosystem).
18. Will the proposed remedial strategies be effective in achieving the objectives of the remedial action plan? Are the proposed remedial strategies consistent with the general and specific objectives of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement?
19. Is there a schedule for implementation and completion of remedial measures?
20. Have the agencies responsible for remediation been identified and accepted responsibility?
21. Are there adequate funds and staff resources set aside for implementation of the remedial strategies?
22. Is there an adequate monitoring process outlined to measure the effectiveness of the remedial strategies and to ensure that remediation is completed?
23. Is there an adequate process set up to measure any adverse effects of the remedial strategies?

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes that all of the above criteria should be answered affirmatively for RAPs to be judged complete; AND,

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United request the Water Quality Board of the IJC to establish and publicize clear listing and delisting criteria for Areas of Concern; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United advises that otwithstanding complex environmental problems, RAPs be constructed and review with a bias for immediate action; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United recommends that implementation of RAPs be part of the annual agreements between the states and US EPA to implement the Clean Water Act and between Ontario and Canada to implement the Canada Ontario Agreement.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Protection Fund

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the concept of the states establishing a fund to provide additional, stable, long term financing of Great Lakes research, monitoring and clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Great Lakes Governors and a steering committee of the Great Lakes Protection Fund to provide for environmental group and public representation on the steering committee, the Board of Trustees and on all other entities created to oversee or administer the Fund; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that this endowment fund not be invested in corporations or municipalities or bond issues of those entities who have a record of violations of environmental laws; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that contributions to the Fund and disbursements from it should supplement and not replace direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activites, and that such fudning be consistent with the "polluter pays" principle as adopted by Canada and the Unisted States as members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Governors should agree to perform and make public an annual audit of each state's spending on Great Lakes research, monitoring, and clean-up activities, including the expenditure of federal grant funds, so as to demonstrate that contributions to or from the Fund are not replacing direct state or federal funding of Great Lakes research, monitoring, or clean-up activities; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the governing body of the Fund with the advice of policymakers throughout the basin should establish clear priorities as to the types of projects eligible for funding and that, within those priority categories, funding decisions should be made exclusively on their scientific merit; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the participation of Ontario and Quebec in the Fund or the establishment of a companion fund in Ontario and Quebec; AND

FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that all research, literature review leading to that research, and monitoring data be made readily available to the public.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United formally endorses the recommendations in Unfulfilled Promises; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United member organizations develop an implementation strategy for the findin s of Unfulfilled Promises, and promote adequate public participation in review o f the Agreement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU focus priority attention on the virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances and zero discharge. The Water Quality Task Force, in cooperation with member groups and staff, shall develop a definition of zero discharge, suggest alternatives for persistent toxic substances and develop an action plan to advocate the changes. GLU also advocates the inclusion in any amended GLWQA of a commitment by the two countries to develop timetables to achieve virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances in the Great Lakes; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the implementation of zero discharge goals through state and provincial legislative/regulatory initiatives such as the proposed Safe Drinking ater Act in New Yor state; AND

FINALLY BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these state/provincial initiatives have estabfished timetables for implementation.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Increased Federal Funding of Great Lakes Research Laboratories

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research rograms because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to:

(1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
(2) EPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Ile, Michigan;
(3) Great Lakes research pro rams funded through the United States Commerce De artment's ea Grant Program at universities in the Great Lakes Region ocused on restoring environmental quality;
(4) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Fisheries Center - Great Lakes, Ann Arbor, Michigan; AND
(5) NOAA's Great Lakes Research Coordinating Office as specified in the 1987 Clean Water Act; AND

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Energy Development and Distribution

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. Energy conservation programs be sustained, introduced or stepped up to stabilize or even reduce consumption levels, thereby reducing ecologically harmful emissions, and/or ecological risks associated with storage and transportation of spent fuels from nuclear
reactors; and

2. A policy of industrial cogeneration be implenented in industrial planning to allow multiple uses of energy sources for greatest efficiency; and

3. Pricing structures be reformed so as to reward conservation vation in energy use, rather than penalize restraint of uee; and

4. Research seek an optimum combination of energy resources for ecosystem protection, not just coat efficiency; and

5. We accelerate the decommissioning of problematic nuclear facilities; and

6. We pursue planning for maximizing local consumption'of locally generated energy to minimize the proliferation of land use for distribution corridors and terminate leases on abandoned corridors; and

7. Finally, we sustain public education programs directed toward approval and support of the above.

Great Lakes United May 13 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Changes to 1985 Resolution on Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT GREAT LAKES UNITED COOPERATE WITH LOCAL GROUPS TO ACTIVELY OPPOSE THESE SITES AND ALL OTHER SITES WHICH MAY BE PROPOSED WITHIN THE BASIN; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT GREAT LAKES UNITED ACTIVELY PROMOTE AND SUSTAIN PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS DIRECTED TOWARD BROAD-BASED PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON SAFE OPTIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF LOW AND HIGH-LEVEL WASTE; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United board members and staff appear with representatives of local groups to present this resolution.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ON TOXlC AIR POLLUTION

BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourages individua1s and its member organizations to contact U.S. Senators and Representatives from the Great Lakes region with their views on working aggressively for comprehensive controls on sources of toxic air pollution to protect the Great Lakes from further degradation.

Great Lakes Representatives and Senators should be asked to communicate with the leaders of the appropriate Congressional committees their views on support for the criteria outlined in the previously listed 1989 Great Lakes United "Resolution on Toxic Air Pollution in the Great Lakes Basin."

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Global Warming

THEREFOFIE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the passage of energy efficiency legislation to reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere and reduce global warming. Such legislation should include automobiles, appliances, and residential and industrial energy efficiency measures.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution
Ground Level Ozone

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada, Ontario and Quebec to develop a comprehensive strategy to control emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such a strategy should include the following elements:
1. Reduction of volatility of gasoline sold in Ontario and Quebec between May and September;
2. Tougher tailpipe emission standards on new motor vehicles sold in Canada;
3. Mandatory in-use venicle inspection and maintenance progrzms; and
4. Further controls on emissions of volatile organic compounds from stationary sources.

Great Lakes United May 7 1989 Great Lakes United resolution