Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization |
Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levels and Flows I |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TEAT, Great Lakes United undertake a comprehensive collation of data and information on the proposed structural and land use options and review the risks of each so that we may better evaluate our future ections. Where there is a lack of information |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Level and Flows II |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United reaffirm support for detailed aaseaament of current water use so ae to better approach defense of Great Lakes United opposition to diveraions and further to affirm Great Lakes United's goal af developing a legal defense against diversion;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United seek the means to fund the necessary legal research and intervention. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Year After Great Lakes Charter |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1986 Annual Meeting of Great Lakes United formally endoraea the document and the following seven-point program recoamendations: 1. Each state and province should formally incorporate a water registration system for all users of Great Lakes waters. This mandatory registration system should include amounts of water returned to the Great Lakes system and in what quality. In addition, this system should not be used to legitimize existing diversion. We should not accept thie registration system as a basis for "grand-fathering" all existing diversions and consumptive uses. 2. Establish present consumptive use needs in the basin based on the registration data and develop projected future consumptive use needs under a variety of economic growth scenarios. This must be coordinated with the establishment of a data base that understand the quantity and quality of water available to the Great Lakes Basin. 3. Detailed analysis of the environmental, social and economic impacts of water diversion, and incorporate those findings into a Public Health and Welfare case. Economic impacts could only be incorporated as they relate to the health and welfare of the citizenry, to avoid economic protectionism as in the El Paso case. 4. Advocate water conservation/improvement programe within and outside the Great Lakes Basin. 5. Develop state and provincial prohibitive diversion legislation based on the Public Health and Welfare case. 6. Great Lakes jurisdicitions would defend the legislative ban on diversion of Great Lakes water out of the basin in courts based on the Public Health and Welfare case. If the legal case was loat, Great Lakes jurisdictions could then incorporate a permitting system for 7. Great Lakes jurisdictions would work with national and-international leaders to develop and implement anti-diversion legislation and agreement 8. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Designating the Great Lakes as Outstanding National Resource Waters |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United at its Annual Meeting in Mackinaw City on May 16-18, 1986, commends Governor lllenchard and the Michigan Water Remources Commission for proposing to classify Michigan's waters of the Great Lakes as "outstanding national resource waters" for purposes'of U.S. EPA's water quality standards regulations; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon Governor Blanchard and the Michigan Water Resources Commission to eliminate the exception in proposed rule 1098(3) which would allow new or increased pollutant diacharges into the connecting channels or tributaries of the Great Lakes within Michigan's boundaries even if these discharges adversely affect Great Lakes water quality; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Michigan Water Resourcee Commission immediately to promulgate proposed rule 1098 designating Michigan's waters of the Great Lakes as "outstanding national resource waters," mended as suggested herein, as a revision to Michigan's water quality standards; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the other Great Lakes states immediately to revise their water quality standards to classify the open waters of the Great Lakes located within their boundaries as "outstanding national resource waters" for purposes of the U.S. BPA's water quality standard regulations. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following recommendations with respect to the Agreement, as well as such others as shall be developed by task forces of Great Lakes United, be brought to the attention of the International Joint Commission, the Governments of the United States and Canada, the Governors and Premiers of Great Lakes States and Provinces, members of Gongress and Parliament, the legislators of said states and provinces, and other interested parties. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT Great Lakes United reaffirms ite support of the policies of the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and opposes any weakening of the Agreement. Great Lakes United will continue to work towards increase public participation in the implementation and review of the Agreement and offers the following recommendations which apply to any opportunity to strengthen the Agreement by technical Amendment or other means: 1. The Parties ehould adopt an integrated approach to protecting both water quality and water quantity in the Great Lakee Basin. Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Public Hearings |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges its member organizations to take an active role in the hearing(s) nearest them. Member organizations are urged to use the hearings and the accompanying hot-spot tours to: |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include , but are not limited to: (1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan; |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Reauthorizating the US Clean Water Act |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urge the Conference Committee Members to move at once to approve a strong and comprehensive Clean Water Act and calle upon the Great Lakes Congressional Delegetes to urge the Conference Committee to avoid further delays in completing its work on the Clean Water Act. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Air Toxics |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United formally endorses the findings of the Toxic Air Pollution in the Great Lakes Basin: A Call for Action; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United participate in the ongoing public participation process on the proposed Canadian Environmental Protection Act, dealing with the control of toxic air emissions; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United will work to develop an implementation strategy for the regulatory and research recommendation of the report; and FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support federal legislative field hearings in the Great Lakes Basin on the issue and amendments to federal Clean Air Acts to carry out the goals of the report. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Detroit Incinerator |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United emphatically reaffirms its resolution on incineration of municipal solid waste as adopted at the Annual Meeting on May 18, 1986, and opposes the construction of the Detroit Resource Recovery Facility unless it is equipped with state of the art technology including a baghouse and dry scrubber; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any incinerator must not be allowed to operate without a proper emission monitoring system for toxic pollutants in place, the results of which must be available to governments and publics in both the United States and Canada; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an integrated waste management strategy must be developed with an emphasis on, and articulation of plans to implement recycling and waste reduction programs. Any such strategy should contain mechanisms to provide for public participation in all stages of development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any new municipal waste incinerators not be built until the affected area has exhausted all efforts to reduce at least 50% of its waste through recycling, recovery, reuse, reduction, composting, and other alternative waste management strategies other than landfilling, and only then can such facitilities be built if they meet the standards of lowest achievable emission rates. FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United members continue to urge Mayor Coleman Young, the City of Detroit, and Governor Blanchard to support these resolutions and the organization consider joining the appropriate legal case which would force state of the art pollution control devices on the plant. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Waste |
BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Permanent Solutions to Toxic Landfills |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United calls upon the Environrental Protection Agency to replace their general policy for remedial action at abondoned hazardous waste sites in the Great Lakes Basin with a policy which emphasises permanent solutions to these BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United be authorized to join local organizations actively opposing construction and operation of new land burial facilities such as CECOS Secure Chemical Residue Facility (SERF) #6 being proposed by CECOS Int'l. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Land Use |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United objects to the City of Erie's proposed zoning regulations. GLU advocates amendments to the proposed zoning package which adhere to the following guidelines: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU requests that the U.S. EPA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the federal Coastal Zone Management Program administrators, and others, as deemed appropriate, investigate Pennsylvania's implementation of the Coastal Zone Managment Program in Erie; and FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that GLU petition the International Joint Commission to add Presque Isle Bay, Harbor, and the area surrounding Erie , Pennsylvania , to the IJC's list of Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Levels and Diversions I |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support legislative and administrative proposals which recognize the natural fluctuation of lake levels and, address long-term solutions to lake level problems including improved coastal zone management practices, establishment of flood sensitive zones, restrictions on building on barrier island and flood sensitive zones, utilization of environmentally sound shoreline protection devices and a better understanding of the flow-thru rates from one lake to another. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support one-time federal emergency assistance to Great Lakes shoreline property owners for the necessary financial resources to relocate families, set-back structures and/or buy out existing properties for public use. FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United continues to oppose any increased diversions into or out of the Great Lakes Basin and promotes a regional water management and data collection system that implements the intent of the Great Lakes Charter. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Levels Flows and Diversions II |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition the government of Ontario to reverse its decision not to designate this project and to formally designate this project under the Environmental Assessment Act or to establish a commission under Public Inquiries Act to suspend approvals process and to report within 60 days. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United work with the Friends of the Magpie River to ensure these environmental concerns are addressed and no increased diversion are permitted into the Great Lakes Basin. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Increased Federal Funding of Great Lakes |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United petition Congress to increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to inflation since 1980; these programs include, but are not limited to: (1) NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan; |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Overflow Dredging |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United actively seek to stop overflow dredging. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes United Resolution Summaries 1983 - 1987 |
Resolution Summaries topcis are Air Pollution, Fallout, Water Quality, Hazardous Waste, Toxic Substances, Water Levels, Water Flow, Diversions, Navigation, Fish Health, Wildlife Health, Habitat Health, Land Use, Energy Distribution, Energy Development, and Education. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| NUCLEAR WASTES AND NUCLEAR PLANTS AROUND THE GREAT LAKES BASIN |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United includes all radioactive wates in the definition of hazardous or toxic wastes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes new construction, and/or completion/start-up of nuclear power plants within the Great Lakes Basin, and that those plants already built within the Basin be phased out as soon as possible. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Chlorofluorocarbons in the Atmosphere |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United applauds the signing of the Montreal Accord for ozone protection; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that because the Montreal Accord's call for a 20% CFC (Chlorofluorocarbons) reduction will not be sufficient to protect the ozone layer, Great Lakes United encourages all CFC-producing countries to romptly develop CFC substitutes and to work towards the worldwide phaseout of & FCs. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Transboundary Air Quality |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the creation of a Detroit-Windsor Air Pollution Board, with full public articipation to set standards for air, and water, and leachate in the transboun ary Great Lakes area; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that both federal, state, and provincial governments fund a major programme of public and consumer education, and increased support be given to localized and private efforts to reduce the use of toxic substances and to control their storage and disposal along with an emphasis on recycling as called for in the IJC Third Biennial Report; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Ontario's new regulation 308 include specific recommendations for dealing with the effects of transboundary air pollution on the ambient air quality standard for Windsor and include an Ambient Air Quality Report similar to the industrial discharge reports for Ontario waterways. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Alternatives to Dredging |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a study(ies) by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada of the need to continue full-scale, wide-spread dredging, and the availability and usefulness of preventie measures--such as strong watershed management--and environmentally and economically sound alternatives to dredging; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada study be the basis for appropriate action by local, state, federal, and provincial agencies. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Contaminated Sediments and Sediment Criteria |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that regulations with uniform numerical criteria common to both federal jurisdictions be established to determine the extent of contamination in sediment and therefore the options for disposal and treatment of that sediment; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such criteria not only measure concentrations of contaminants in sediment, but that they also take into account the cumulative effects of multiple contaminant(s), the organic content and sediment size distribution, the movement (partitioning) of contaminants between sediment and water column, and chronic as well as acute effects on biota (bioaccummulation); AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that citizens be included in the decision-making process for developing said criteria as well as in reviewing all drafts of regulations including the final criteria. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Creation of a National Program for Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports an Aquafund concept in the United States and Canada to fund the im lementation of research programs, prioritization and mapping of toxic hot spots, 2 emonstration cleanup projects, and ermanent cleanup activities for contaminated sediment areas in our waterways; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such a concept or program, established in each country, must address the coordination of air, water, and land use issues on a watershed basis; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that time is of the essence in developing practical funding mechanisms for such programs and that such mechanisms be devised by the two federal governments in consultation with Great Lakes United, its member organizations, and other interested citizens' groups; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no such funding mechanism be approved that includes any scheme that could be interpreted as a "license to pollute" by direct dischargers; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that positive incentives to prevent future pollution and to encourage waste minimization and source reduction be built into any legislation or regulation; AND Et Cetera |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Regulations for Confined Disposal Facilities for Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that there be an immediate ban on the construction of all and any new in water diked disposal facilities in the Great Lakes; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all existing confined disposal facilities undergo a detailed review and evaluation to determine the current integrity of their barriers, such review to be carried out by appropriate government agencies in each country; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a protocol for ongoing monitoring for leaking, discharges, and progress impacts on the surrounding ecosystem be established by December, 1988 for all currently existing confined disposal facilities and that monitoring be implemented at all sites immediately, even as the protocals are being established; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an action plan for the removal and/or closure and remediation of all confined disposal facilities be developed and that remediation of confined disposal facilities in Areas of Concern be incorporated into the Remedial Action Plan for those Areas, and that this be done with the objective of determining ecosystem-positive methods of final treatment of the contiaminated sediments involved; AND Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |