Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization |
Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farm Bill |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakea United supports these provisions in the 1985 Farm Bill; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United supports the reforms of existing federal farm programs t a remove subeidies for production of surplus crops on wetlands drained and cleared after 1981. |
Great Lakes United | May 15 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Week |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United charge the Board of Directors to continue to designate a week to be called "Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Week" (GLW) for the purpose of educating citizens about the basin's hietory, ecology, and resource management issues; and to focus attention upon the Great Lakes ecoeyetem; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that since GLW encompasses all the educational goals of Great Lakes United, it should become a plenary seesion agenda item at the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting for ae long as Great Lakes United continues to proclaim Great Lakes Week; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that sember organizations of Great Lakes United take a coordinating role in organizing events for euch a week in their respective communities; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each Great Lakes United region designate a repreeentative to coordinate activities within their own region; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in order for a region to designate a GLW representative, Great Lakes regions of Great Lakes United need to meet to deeignate a representative; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Week Task Force of Great Lakes United designate individuals to obtain proclamations of each a week by Governors, Premiers, the President, the Prime Ministers and legislative bodies throughout the Great Lakes Basin; and Et Cetera |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| TOXIC AIR POLLUTION AND ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION TO THE GREAT LAXES BASIN |
THBREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United, assembled in annual meeting of Way 17-19, 1985, in Chicago, Illinois, endorses and urges immediate implementation of "A Proposal for a Program to Study Atmospheric Loading of Toxic Chemicals to the Great Lakes: Report to Great BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports necessary federal, state-and provincial f.unding needed to achieve the proposal's recommendations for monitoring, research on gaseous and dry deposition sampling, and pollution source inventories. SPECIFICALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United endorses: |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Waste Transport in the Great Lakes Basin |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United actively promote new federal, state, provincial and local regulations to suspend the transportation of high level nuclear waste within the Great Lakes Basin until such a time that the above concerns are fully addressed and the safe transport of the fuel can be assured. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Waste |
THEREFORE B6 IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United urge the U.S. Department of Energy and Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. that any potential sites for nuclear waste repositories in the Qreat Lakes/St. Lawrence watershed be immediately disqualified from any further consideration for such use, and furthermore, future plans for nuclear waste repositories must consider the magnitude and ecologic seneitivity of the hydrological features of the location being reviewed. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Wetlands Protection |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United: - opposes any attempts to reduce the scope of the Section 404 program or the protections now given wetlands by the U.S. EPAss 404(b) (1) Guidelines;
|
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Right to Know |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that strong right-to-know legislation be enacted that:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that employers should be prohibited from disciplining, diacharging or discriminating against workers who exercise right-to-know rights when implemented into law or files a complaint against their employer. THERBFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Federal, State and Local agencies responsible for the enforcement of the above provisions, implement meaningful penalties against employers who repeatedly violate right-to-know legislation. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Ohio River Canal Study Proposal in Congress |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes B.R. 1519 or any such legislation to fund the atudy of a Lake Erie-Ohio River Canal Project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is inappropriate to fund studies on far-reaching projecta inconsistent with the Great Lakes Charter when other federal qualitative and quantitative research prograre for the Greet Lakes Basin are being crippled in the Halls of Congrees. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Implementation of the Great Lakes Charter |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United re-affirms its opposition to any new diversions out of or into the Great Lakes Basin; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on provincial and state governmenta to demonstrate a commitment to implementing the Great Lakes' Charter through
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on its members to bring their elected public officials to account for any proposal they support which could increase chances for inter-basin diversion of Great Lakes waters, and requeat their public officials to define their commitment to implementing the Great Lakes Charter. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Navigation on the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence River Waterway System |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes United navigation task force should be broadened and continue its work for the purpose of: (1) investigating the critical issues which have been advanced in the position paper and any others which may arise; and (2) work along with Great Lakes United members in the development and refining of an action strategy for implementation of Great Lakes United resolutions on commercial navigation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United Navigation's Task Force-promote the following recommendations: The establishment of uniform and coordinated regulatory standards and rules governing commercial navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System which takes the unique environmental, 'social, climatic, economic conditions of the Basin into account. Elements to be coneidered in these uniform regulatory initiatives are: 1. limitation of hazardous goods transported on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System to ice free and good weather conditions; 2. and in some instances, completely banning the transportation of some kinds of hazardous material, such as radiotoxic material; 3. the enactment of provisions which would impart absolute liability for carriers and shippers of hazardous materials; 4 . the application of stringent safety requirements (which would equal thoee most stringent standards now existing in the basin); 5. the mandatory development of proven containment and clean-up provisions and mechanisms 6. the creation of coordinated mechanisms to ensure the proper monitoring and enforcement of the uniform regulations between Canada and the U.S 7. further research ott the ecological and human health effects of various substances and materials and the working toward a more specific and uniform definition of "hazardous" and "dangerous" material. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Sault St. Marie Lock |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes that no justification exists to spend $226.6 million at this time for a new 1300 ft. lock at Sault Ste. Marie. However, if construction of this lock is to proceed despite these objections it should include the following elements not included in the Detroit District's final interim feasibility study. They are: (1) Dredged materials be used to enhance the local environment. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Water Conservation |
THEREFOREs BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United supports water conservation planning, programs, and measures in the Great Lakes region and in more arid regions in the U.S. and Canada, not only for present needs but also for use by future generations; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the conversion of additional arid lands to agricultural lands through irrigation. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Reauthorization of the Coastal Zone Management Act |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Coastal Management Act be reauthorized with continued etrong federal support for state management programs; and BE IT FURTHER RBSOLVBD THAT, special emphasis and additional funding be provided for additional acquisition of estuarine sanctuaries forprotection and study; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the crippling Supreme Court decision undermining the consietency provision be overturned in the area of offahore oil and gas leaeing, and that the federal consistency provision be strengthened to encompass other important federal activities, such as the designation of ocean incineration sites; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Coaetal Zone Management Act, with a reinstituted consistency provision for ell federal activities directly affecting states' coastal zonee, be expeditiously reauthorized by Congress at adequate funding levels during the 1984 legielative session. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Canadian Grand Canal Program |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakea United exprasses its outrage that the Grand Canal project could even be seriously considered by Canadian private interest groups and public officials and opposes any study or further considerations of the proposal. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems and Pretreatment |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, GLU recommends that BPI, the states and provinces and municipalities place a high priority on the evaluation and control of industrial discharges to municipal treatment systems; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, environmental groups and local citizens actively participate in the overview of development and implementation of local pretreatment programs; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, municipalities with adequate technical and financial assistance from the federal, state, and provincial agencies assure that adequate monitoring is conducted to identify and determine the need for control of toxic substances. This evaluation shall not be limited to EPA'a priority pollutants and should focus on industrial raw materials, catalysts, intermediates, by- products, etc. The evaluation shall include periodic sludge, air and effluent evaluations. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Use of Risk Assessment for Regulating Carinogens |
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United does not endorse the principle of quantitative risk assessment as the sole basis for eetabliahing environmental standards for carcinogens; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United also recognizes that the quantitative evaluation of data may be useful in sore circumstances, such as the prioritization of environmentally significant chemicals; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourages the development of alternative rethoda to set environrental standards for carcinogens, such as goals of non-detectable discharges and lowest achievable discharge linite, using Best Available Technology, where they prove to be more protective to human health and the environment; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourages the State, Provincial and Federal government and the IJC to coordinate the development of standards and guidelines consistent with the principles articulated in the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement or any revised agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great LakeS United encourages the State, Provincial and Federal governments as well as industries that discharge wates into the Great Lakes, to expand their efforts to curtail the pollution of the Great Lakes by examing source reduction and source elimination technologies, and any other environmentally sound alternatives for waste disposal. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Backsliding Modification to Waste Water Toxic Discharges in Wisconsin |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Great Lakes United that it urges the Wisconsin legislature to disapprove the new wasteload allocation regulations, and that it urges the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to disapprove the proposed modifications for the pulp and paper mills discharging into Cluster II of the Fox River absent further study of the mill's ability to continue complying with the existing permit limitations and the potential for increased discharges of toxic pollutants into the Great Lakes watershed; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thet Great Lakes United urges Wisconsin, Michigan and all the Great Lakes jurisdictions to adopt a stringent "anti-backsliding" policy which prohibits the relaxation of discharge permit effluent limitations except in exceptional circumstances; and BE IT FURTHER BESOLVED,that areat Lakes United supports the amendment of the Clean Water Act by the U.S. Congrese to include a stringent "anti-backeliding" policy which prohibits the relaxation of discharge permit effluent limitations except in exceptional circumstances; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges its member organizations to express their concern over such backsliding from permit effluent limitatione to the area Lakes jurisdictions and to the U . S . Congress. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Clean Water Act |
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges Congress to reauthorize a Clean Water Act which |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Adequate Enforcement and Implementation of Environmental Laws |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United work work with its member organizations at the state, provincial and national levels to: 1. assess and analyze the staffing and funding needs of state, national and international programs that should operate to protect the Great Lakes from pollution and mismanagement, |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Toxic Agreements |
THBREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United supports promulgation and implementation of the Greet Lakee Toxic Substances Control Agreement; BE IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement in the implementation and review of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement is essential to the control of toxic pollutants entering the Great Lakes System; BB IT FURTHBR RESOLVED, that U.S. and Canadian citizen involvement is the design of any Basin-wide agreement including, at a minimum, consultation and responce as provided for in the agreement, is essential to the control of toxic pollutants; and FINALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that the success of the Great Lakes Toxic Substance Control Agreement in controlling the entry of toxic pollutants into the Great Lakes system is dependent upon continuing public involvement. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Airborne Toxic Pollutants |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United recommends the following refinements to state, federal and provincial air quality programs: Sources of non-criteria pollutants should use Best Available Control Technology to reduce and/or eliminate toxic releases. Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Legislative Hearings on Toxic Deposition |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United requests the: United States House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce; and |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Use of Oil Over-Charge Monies |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes states apply a significant amount of funds to long-term and meaningful energy conservation efforts and utilization of renewable energy sourcee consistent with the court decieion. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Costal Zone Management |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOVLED THAT those states with federally approved Coastal Management Programs under the DZMA should work expeditiously to significantly improve their Programs, and that pertinent Canadian federal and provincial jurisdictions vigorously undertake protection of costal areas. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT states without federally approved Coastal Management Programs under the CZMA should make the creation and approval of a Program a top priority; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED THAT Coastal Management Programs should include strict erosion set-back regulations, a coherent policy overseeing commercial and residential lakefront development and assured access for the public to lakefront areas; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT serious water quality issues, including but not limited to toxic pollution, acidic deposition, heavy metals and other pollutants associated with development, be address by the Great Lakes states so that water-dependant industries, and recreational and aesthetic uses of the Lakes can continue; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED THAT coastal barriers not presently protected by state or federal laws, and those that are proposed for inclusion in the Coastal Barriers Resources System, be included in the System. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United endorse the establishment of a US-Canadian joint Coastal Management program. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Inclusion of Fish and Wildlife for Consideration in Remedial Action Plans |
THEREFOREI BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United request the International Joint Commission and i t e Water Quality Board, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and its habitat Advisory Board and the 32 Federal, State, and Provincial reaource agencies that in the drafting and implementation of Remedial Action Plans: 1. Fish and,Wildlife habitat needs be given full consideration; |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |