Home

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Title Description Organization Date published Content Typesort icon
Alternative Non-Incineration Destruction Technology for PCBs Other Historic Chlorinated Hazardous Waste

Therefore be it resolved that, in keeping with the virtual elimination goal and zero discharge policy of the GLWQA, Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada and the United States to choose methods for destroying stockpiles of PCBs and other chlorinated hazardous waste that meet the following critera:

1. No incineration of chlorinated hazardous waste
2. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be evaluated on the basis of a 100% destruction efficiency standard
3. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must be closed loop systems
4. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not be used as an alternative to banning and stopping the generation of hazardous waste.  These technologies must never be used as an excuse not to meet the IJC's goals of zero discharge. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must only be used for the destruction of historic stockpiles of chlorinated hazardous waste, and must never be used for control of process waste.
5. Alternative, non-incineration technologies must not themselves  generate persistent toxic substances or otherwise threaten or endanger human health or the environment
6. All alternative, non-incineration destruction methods should be properly and comprehensively evaluated before applications are approved and their use tightly regulated and controlled by federal, state, provincial and municipal authorities
7. Destruction, transportation and/or handling of these substances shall not pose additional risk to human health and/or the envionment
8. All proposals must pay particular attention to occupational health and safety issues.  Potential risks from occupational exposure should be monitored and fully disclosed to all employees.
9. All communities and workers have a right to fully participate and accept or reject destruction proposals.
10. Potential host communities should be fully consulted before implementation of destruction programmes, with all available data fully disclosed.  Emergency response plans shall be developed with host community input.
11. Destructio nof wates should be paid for by the generator of such wastes.

Great Lakes United Jun 7 1998 Great Lakes United resolution
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Chicago World's Fair

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United at its annual meeting in Toronto, May 13, 1984, opposes any filling of Lake Michigan for the 1992 World's Fair.

Great Lakes United May 13 1984 Great Lakes United resolution
Restoration of Coastal Brook Trout in Lake Superior

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United enthusiastically supports full rehabilitation and restoration of the native coaster brook trout in Lake Superior and its tributary waters;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That GLU calls upon all citizens of the Lake Superior Basin and especially on all of the state, provincial, First Nation, and tribal governments in the Basin to expeditiously take all of the necessary steps to assure that their respective fishery management agencies both can and do implement plans leading to the maximum possible rehabilitation and restoration of the native coaster brook trout to the waters and tributaries of Lake Superior;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it calls on the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and especially on its Lake Superior Committee to modify their Joint Strategic Plan, Fish Community Objectives and other policies to accommodate the maximum possible restoration of the native coaster brook trout to the waters and tributaries of Lake Superior;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it calls on the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and its Lake Huron and Lake Michigan Committees to evolve plans for the restoration of coaster brook trout in Lakes Huron and Michigan;

AND BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that it calls on the federal governments of the United States and Canada, especially their wildlife and environmental agencies, on public and private charitable foundations, and on North American private environmental and conservation organizations to support, to undertake and to provide resources for a broad initiative to conduct the research, to restore the habitat in and the hnctionality of rivers and coastal areas, to develop the restoration stocking capacity, and to implement the regulations that are necessary to rehabilitate and restore the stocks of the unique coaster brook trout to the waters of the Upper Great Lakes.

Great Lakes United Jun 13 1999 Great Lakes United resolution
Stop Stream Reconfiguration in Great Lakes basin to Expand Habitat for Non-Native Species

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls on fisheries management units around all of the Great Lakes to stop any further removal of the natural features of streams for the purpose of expanding the habitat for non-native species.

Great Lakes United Jun 7 1998 Great Lakes United resolution
US Federal Wetlands Legislation

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes HR 1330 and S 1463 and endorses HR 4255 as an important, fair legislative tool to halt further loss of wetlands in the US.; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United will communicate this position to all U.S. Senators and Representatives from Great Lakes states within the next month.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in Canada

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the government of Ontario to substantially revise and immediately implement the draft Provincial Wetlands Planning Policy Statement; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must immediately develop effective wetlands protection legislation and expedite its implementation and enforcement to provide effective protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Ontario government must undergo a full review of the municipal land use planning and review process to ensure that it provides adequate protection for wetlands; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the meantime, all existing statutes and regulations that provide for the protection of all wetlands must be used and enforced, including the Conservation Authorities Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, the Public Lands Act, and the Federal Fisheries Act.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetland Protection in United States

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls upon the Congress of the United States to proceed deliberately in reauthorizing the Clean Water Act, and to oppose the numerous bills that would weaken wetland protection provisions of the Act, particularly Section 404; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Congress explicitly include wetland protection in the Clean Water Act Goal Statement, and that the current regulatory definition of waters of the United
States be amended to presume that all waters and wetlands are susceptible to use in interstate commerce; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the list of activities regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act be expanded to include all activities that may damage or degrade wetlands such as draining, dredging, channelizing, flooding, placement of floating and piling supported structures; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 401 should be amended to expressly broaden the protections provided by this section to include wetlands, and direct states to address physical and biological alterations of aquatic areas, as well as chemical pollution; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Nationwide permit program should be substantially revised to control ongoing cumulative wetland losses, specifically to (1) eliminate Nationwide General Permit No. 26, (2) comply with Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines, and (3) prohibit using multiple general permits to avoid the acreage limitations of other general or individual permit requirements.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Wetlands Protection

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United:

- opposes any attempts to reduce the scope of the Section 404 program or the protections now given wetlands by the U.S. EPAss 404(b) (1) Guidelines;
- supports reforms of existing federal farm programe to remove subsidies for production of taurplua crops on wetlande drained and cleared after 1981;
- recommends the elimination of federal, state, and provincial tax incentives for draining and clearing of wetlande.

 

Great Lakes United May 19 1985 Great Lakes United resolution
Above Ground Storage of Radioactive Waste

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls on the Federal Cabinet to immediately overrule the Minister's decision and direct her to make preparations for a full, independent panel environmental assessment hearing to fully address the health and social concerns expressed by the public.

Great Lakes United Jun 13 1999 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Wetlands

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that a new Annex specifically addressing wetlands losses and their effects on the integrity of the Great Lakes ecosystem be added to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement at its next revision; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for the wetland base in the Great Lakes Basin to be restored, the U,S, and Canadian federal governments should immediately declare the Great Lakes Basin a "demonstration region" for a "Net Gain" in wetland functions and quantity.

Great Lakes United May 5 1991 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Zebra Mussel Research

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United, at its 1994 annual meeting in Buffalo, New York, petition Congress to restore full funding provided by the Non-Indigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to ensure the completion of current research programs designed to develop strategies to understand, deal with, and perhaps reduce the econornidecological impacts of the zebra mussel, AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United call upon all its member organizations to write their Congresspersons and members of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees urging them to support the restoration of full funding for zebra,mussel research in the Great Lakes.

Great Lakes United Jun 6 1994 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Lakes Zebra Quagga Mussel Research

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United petitions Congress to restore full funding provided by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to ensure the completion of current research programs designed to develop strategies to understand, deal with, and perhaps reduce the economic and ecological impacts of nonindigenous aquatic nuisance species such as zebra mussels and sea lamprey, and

Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United call upon all its member organizations to write their state congresspersons and members of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees urging them to support the restoration of full funding for zebra mussel research in the Great Lakes.

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the Canadian federal through the agencies of Fisheries and Oceans in cooperation with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and the Quebec Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food to pursue research on the impacts of these exotic species.

Great Lakes United May 5 1993 Great Lakes United resolution
Great Legacy Natural Heritage Areas Program

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that GREAT LAKES UNITED will work to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy Program to preserve natural areas as reservoirs of biodiversity and protect the best examples of biodiversity in aquatic and terrestrial sites located in pristine or restored areas of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU strongly urges the Council of Great Lakes Governors to provide regional political leadership necessary to establish and implement the Great Legacy program, a Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin-wide biodiversity conservation strategy; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that GLU urges the states and provinces in the Great Lakes Basin as well as local units of government to take expeditious and appropriate steps to support the establishment and implementation of the Great Legacy program;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be conveyed to the Governors and Premlers of the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Basin and the office of the Council of Great Lakes Governors.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Inclusion of Fish and Wildlife for Consideration in Remedial Action Plans

THEREFOREI BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United request the International Joint Commission and i t e Water Quality Board, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and its habitat Advisory Board and the 32 Federal, State, and Provincial reaource agencies that in the drafting and implementation of Remedial Action Plans:

1. Fish and,Wildlife habitat needs be given full consideration;
2. Fish and Wildlife professioaala be involved from the start;
3. Great Lakea United and other citizens be involved;
4. Commieeions and Agencies be requested to keep Great Lakes United and other citizens' grouge provided with information on the development process.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Introduction of Exotic Species into the Great Lakes Ecosystem

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United encourage provincial, state, and federal agencies and academic institutions to proceed expeditiously with such research; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United and its member organizations request their regulatory agencies to implement, enforce and monitor voluntary and required actions by shippers and other users of Great Lakes resources, to prevent the further introduction of such exotic organisms; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that members of Great Lakes United organizations, and all users of Great Lakes resources in general, be encouraged to take all appropriate individual actions to prevent the further spread of such exotic organisms in the Great Lakes region.

Great Lakes United May 6 1990 Great Lakes United resolution
NYS Environmental Trust Fund

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the establishment of an Environmental Trust Fund in New York State which:

  • provides funds on an Annual basis for open space protection, clean water and solid waste managements;
  • dedicates, at a minimum, a $100 million a year through existing beer and soda tax of $87 million a year and $14 million a year from cunent lubricating oil tax currently going into general fund;
  • works to establish additional revenue resources such as unclaimed nickel deposits for drink containers, a proposed tire tax, or other concepts including water use fees; and
  • includes a mechanism for the Environmental Facilities Corporation to issue bonds to increase availability of funds for this purpose.
Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Preservation of Strawberry Island

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakea United provide expertise and assistance to achieve the goals of erosion control, future State ownerahip and long-term management.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United encourage the Federal Governmental Agencies, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and the New York Department of Parka and Recreation to apply ecologically aound methods to control erosion and to further enhance the recreational, fisheries and other natural benefits of the island.

Great Lakes United May 18 1986 Great Lakes United resolution
Protection for Long Point, Ontario

BE IT RESOLVED, that the government of Ontario be urged to take the steps outlined above with respect to the Long Polnt watershed: AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the governments of Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York across Lake Erie from Long Point and the federal governments of Canada and the United States, through the appropriate legislators, agencies and ministries, the International Joint Commisslon, and non-governmental agencies and groups be urged to ask the Ontario government to pursue the actions listed above to protect and preserve Long Point, a world class example of biodiversity and variety of natural habitat.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Reauthorization of the US Endangered Species Act

NOW BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that Great Lakes Unlted supports passage of HR 4045 and will communicate this position to Congressmen from the Great Lakes states.

Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste; AND

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United make the reclassification of Class C low level radioactive waste to high level a top priority issue.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Municipal Waste Management

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the following policies:

1. Each government jurisdiction shall set up programmes to remove household and commercial/industrial hazardous wastes, as well as infectious wastes, from the municipal solid waste stream.

2a. The governments within the Great Lakes Basin shall set a minimum 50% target for removal of household and commercia1 industria1 materials from the municipal solid waste stream through reduction, reuse and recycling methods, including composting, within the next ten years.

2b. State and provincial governments shall establish programs to assist in the development of markets for used oil, glass, paper, metal tires and other materials.  Procurement of products made from these materials shall be encouraged wherever possible.

2c. The local, state/provincial and federal governments shall train appropriate personnel to oversee, implement and coordinate the above programs.

3. Within the next three years, each Province and State within the Great Lakes Basin shall ass legislation requiring re cling of household and industrial / commercial wastes in order to achieve the targets in Section 2.

4a. The appropriate government jurisdictions shall pass packaging legislation so as to reduce excess and non-reusable and non-recyclable packaging and to promote recyclable packaging.

4b. Plastic packagin material shall be labelled as to composition so as to enhance recyclability.

5a. A programme to develop, institute and reach the minimum 50% target for reduction, reuse and recycling of wastes must be attained before new landfills and incinerators are considered for wastes.

5b. Recyclable materials shall be exempt from any flow control restrictions.

6. The government jurisdictions shall provide adequate funding through the budgetary process to ensure that the above actions can be implemented.

Great Lakes United May 8 1988 Great Lakes United resolution
Need for Strong Medical Waste Regulations

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United:

  • Urges the International Joint Commission to advocate strongly with the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada to adopt strong rules which eliminate the discharge of persistent toxic compounds from medical waste incinerators,
  • Urges the International Joint Commission to advocate for and work with the health care industry to adopt a materials policy which will lead to zero discharge of persistent toxic compounds, and
  • Urges the U.S. EPA to adopt strong rules to eliminate the formation of dioxin and the release of mercury by medical waste incinerators, and to encourage the health care industry to adopt a materials policy which will lead to zero discharge of persistent toxic substances.
Great Lakes United May 31 1997 Great Lakes United resolution
Nuclear Waste

BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United diligently campaign for the reclassification of Class C nuclear wastes from low level to high level nuclear waste.

Great Lakes United May 3 1987 Great Lakes United resolution
Human Health Project

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Task Force takes into account that:

  • Human health is a key component for driving public policy for change; AND
  • The Task Force broadens the concept of human heah, taking lnto consideration such factors as employment, education, occupation, ethnlclty, race, gender and sexual preference; AND
  • Is essential that the project have representation within the community; AND
  • The Task Force recognizes all Great Lakes citizens as exposed populations; AND
  • The proposal include funding to enable the Task Force to provlde basinwide community direction to the project.
Great Lakes United May 3 1992 Great Lakes United resolution
Promoting Sustainable Food System Support

Therefore, be it resolved that Great Lakes United, wherever possible, source food and farm products locally, with a preference for organically grown products.
Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United, wherever possible, sign on to sustainable food and food system policies.
Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United urge and support its network to do the same.

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution