Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization | Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOXIC AIR POLLUTION AND ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION TO THE GREAT LAXES BASIN |
THBREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United, assembled in annual meeting of Way 17-19, 1985, in Chicago, Illinois, endorses and urges immediate implementation of "A Proposal for a Program to Study Atmospheric Loading of Toxic Chemicals to the Great Lakes: Report to Great BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports necessary federal, state-and provincial f.unding needed to achieve the proposal's recommendations for monitoring, research on gaseous and dry deposition sampling, and pollution source inventories. SPECIFICALLY, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United endorses: |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Toxic Air Pollution in the Great Lakes Basin |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United endorses the following 1. The application of BACT for all major sources of toxic air pollution identified. The Environmental Protection Agency shall establish BACT standards for existing and modified sources to include a "floor" that, at a minimum, requires emitters to achieve emissions reductions equivalent to those achieved by the ten percent lowest emitting facilities within their industrial category. EPA shall establish firm deadlines for compliance with BACT standards; and 2. The adoption of secondary standards where BACT is noi sufficient to protect human health and the environment. Standards shall be sufficient to protect fish and wildlife, and shall include human health protection from secondary exposure through food and drinking water. Health risk assessment shall be used only as an interim control step in the uitimate phaseout of carcinogenic and persistent and/or bioaccumulative toxic substances. The risk from these toxics shall be reduced to one-in-one-million within a strict deadline. A goal of 3. A comprehensive program to address the threat from accidental releases of AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, tnat an international agreement similar to the Montreal Protocol shall be enacted that includes a prohibition on the manufacture and export of DDT and other toxic substances that have been banned for use in the U.S. and Canada. |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1989 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Transboundary Air Quality |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports the creation of a Detroit-Windsor Air Pollution Board, with full public articipation to set standards for air, and water, and leachate in the transboun ary Great Lakes area; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that both federal, state, and provincial governments fund a major programme of public and consumer education, and increased support be given to localized and private efforts to reduce the use of toxic substances and to control their storage and disposal along with an emphasis on recycling as called for in the IJC Third Biennial Report; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Ontario's new regulation 308 include specific recommendations for dealing with the effects of transboundary air pollution on the ambient air quality standard for Windsor and include an Ambient Air Quality Report similar to the industrial discharge reports for Ontario waterways. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Alternatives to Dredging |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports a study(ies) by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada of the need to continue full-scale, wide-spread dredging, and the availability and usefulness of preventie measures--such as strong watershed management--and environmentally and economically sound alternatives to dredging; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada study be the basis for appropriate action by local, state, federal, and provincial agencies. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Contaminated Sediments and Sediment Criteria |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that regulations with uniform numerical criteria common to both federal jurisdictions be established to determine the extent of contamination in sediment and therefore the options for disposal and treatment of that sediment; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such criteria not only measure concentrations of contaminants in sediment, but that they also take into account the cumulative effects of multiple contaminant(s), the organic content and sediment size distribution, the movement (partitioning) of contaminants between sediment and water column, and chronic as well as acute effects on biota (bioaccummulation); AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that citizens be included in the decision-making process for developing said criteria as well as in reviewing all drafts of regulations including the final criteria. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that guidelines for national criteria which take into account long-term, bioaccumulative ecosystem effects as well as human effects be developed by U.S. EPA before the end of fiscal 1990, and that specific numerical criteria shall be established for particular organic chemicals and heavy metals -- with an emphasis on Clean Water Act priority pollutants and other chemicals deemed to have a significant impact on water quality and aquatic species -- at the rate of 22 chemicals per year for the next five years; AND BE IT FURWER RESOLVED, that the U.S. General Accounting Office be asked to conduct a study to be completed by July 1990 that estimates costs and identifies funding options for a national (U.S.) Contaminated Sediments Fund and/or an expanded Super-fund and that such a study shall consider the following options: "user fees" or permit processing fees for harbor authorities, direct dischargers who contribute to the problem, commercial water users such as marinas, or the private firms with whom the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contracts dredging operations; fines levied against transportation and shipping industries for spills and discharges; and court revenues received through liability claims and enforcement actions against Clean Water Act violators; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Canada and the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec adopt uniform national guidelines and provincial criteria and standards for assessing the toxicity of contaminated sediment and that those criteria and standards take into account chronic and bioaccumulative effects on the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River ecosystem; AND Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1989 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Contaminated Sediments Site Inventory |
Therefore be it resolved that the governments of Canada and the United States develop a Great Lakes inventory and indepth assessment of contaminated sediment sites in the Great Lakes Watershed by 1994, and Be it further resolved that both governments should use compatible assessment techniques and units of measure. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1993 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Creation of a National Program for Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports an Aquafund concept in the United States and Canada to fund the im lementation of research programs, prioritization and mapping of toxic hot spots, 2 emonstration cleanup projects, and ermanent cleanup activities for contaminated sediment areas in our waterways; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such a concept or program, established in each country, must address the coordination of air, water, and land use issues on a watershed basis; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that time is of the essence in developing practical funding mechanisms for such programs and that such mechanisms be devised by the two federal governments in consultation with Great Lakes United, its member organizations, and other interested citizens' groups; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no such funding mechanism be approved that includes any scheme that could be interpreted as a "license to pollute" by direct dischargers; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that positive incentives to prevent future pollution and to encourage waste minimization and source reduction be built into any legislation or regulation; AND Et Cetera |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Open Water Disposal in Maumee Bay |
THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the U.S. and Canadian Governments not to dispose of contaminated sediments in the open waters of the Great Lakes; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Corps of Engineers must abide by state water quality standards t o the extent mandated in Section 404 of the Clean-Water Act in determining the Federal Standard for the disposal of dredged sediments. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Regulations for Confined Disposal Facilities for Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that there be an immediate ban on the construction of all and any new in water diked disposal facilities in the Great Lakes; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all existing confined disposal facilities undergo a detailed review and evaluation to determine the current integrity of their barriers, such review to be carried out by appropriate government agencies in each country; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a protocol for ongoing monitoring for leaking, discharges, and progress impacts on the surrounding ecosystem be established by December, 1988 for all currently existing confined disposal facilities and that monitoring be implemented at all sites immediately, even as the protocals are being established; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an action plan for the removal and/or closure and remediation of all confined disposal facilities be developed and that remediation of confined disposal facilities in Areas of Concern be incorporated into the Remedial Action Plan for those Areas, and that this be done with the objective of determining ecosystem-positive methods of final treatment of the contiaminated sediments involved; AND Et Cetera. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Restrictions for Dredging Activities of Contaminated Sediments |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that in such areas dredging activities be regulated as point sources of contamination, with permits required to ensure that environmental safeguards are in place and that best available dredging technology is used; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, where the dredgin activities of one nation may adversely affect the ecosystem of another, or where d redging activities are carried out in international waters, a binational committee, including citizens as well as government representatives, be appointed by the two federal governments; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, until such standards are developed, state of the art technologies minimizing environmental impacts for dredging equipment should be used on a site-specific basis; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that new federal appropriations be sought to develop new advanced dredging technologies; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that until comprehensive environmental impact and assessment processes are in place for contaminated sediments, a moratorium on open-water dumping should be instituted. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Education |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the areat Lakes United Board of Directors be charged with the responsibility of establishing an ongoing working body responsible for the promotion of environmental awareness, either through the establishment of an ongoing task force or through a formal working relationship with Great Lakes Tomorrow and other related educational organizations. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Funding for the National Sea Grant College Program |
THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United supports the reauthorization of the National Sea Grant College Program and funding at a level of $55 million, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United urges members of Congress from the Great Lakes and other coastal regions to co-sponsor HR 1175 and support full funding for the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THE Great Lakes United urges its member organizatons to communicate immediately with their representatives and senators to encourage their support for this important legislation. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1995 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Week |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United encourages the development of educational programs concerned with environmental issues. The organization urges its members to work on programs in their own localities, particularly for Great Lakes Week. Great Lakes United further recommends that the programs for Great Lakes Week be geared to attract a wider audience by including topics relating to environment (historical, recreational, etc,). |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Week |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the member organizations of Great Lakes United charge the Board of Directors to continue to designate a week to be called "Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Week" (GLW) for the purpose of educating citizens about the basin's hietory, ecology, and resource management issues; and to focus attention upon the Great Lakes ecoeyetem; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that since GLW encompasses all the educational goals of Great Lakes United, it should become a plenary seesion agenda item at the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting for ae long as Great Lakes United continues to proclaim Great Lakes Week; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that sember organizations of Great Lakes United take a coordinating role in organizing events for euch a week in their respective communities; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each Great Lakes United region designate a repreeentative to coordinate activities within their own region; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in order for a region to designate a GLW representative, Great Lakes regions of Great Lakes United need to meet to deeignate a representative; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Great Lakes Week Task Force of Great Lakes United designate individuals to obtain proclamations of each a week by Governors, Premiers, the President, the Prime Ministers and legislative bodies throughout the Great Lakes Basin; and Et Cetera |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Energy Development and Distribution |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 2. A policy of industrial cogeneration be implenented in industrial planning to allow multiple uses of energy sources for greatest efficiency; and 3. Pricing structures be reformed so as to reward conservation vation in energy use, rather than penalize restraint of uee; and 4. Research seek an optimum combination of energy resources for ecosystem protection, not just coat efficiency; and 5. We accelerate the decommissioning of problematic nuclear facilities; and 6. We pursue planning for maximizing local consumption'of locally generated energy to minimize the proliferation of land use for distribution corridors and terminate leases on abandoned corridors; and 7. Finally, we sustain public education programs directed toward approval and support of the above. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Hydropower Projects in the James Bay Region |
THEREFORE BE I T RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the James Bay hydropower project until its effects on native cultures and the environment are fully addressed by New York State and Canada in a comprehensive environmental study; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United supports Assembly Bill 2162A as a step towards the State of New York becoming responsible consumers of electricity and for the protection of the environment; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United commends Assemblymen William B. Hoyt and Maurice D. Hinchey for their leadership in introducing Assembly bill A2162A. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| IJC Nuclear Task Force |
WE THEREFORE RESOLVE that the UC recognize the magnitude of work to finish the proposed health studies and extend the We of this Task Force indefinitely and seek the necessary funding for this criticalty important work an a high priority basis! |
Great Lakes United | Jun 7 1998 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| IJC's Nuclear Task Force work be made HIGH PRIORITY and funding for monitoring be made |
Therefore BE IT RESOLVED that in regard to the pressing issue of radionuclides in the Great Lakes Basin affecting HUMAN HEALTH, the IJC shall elevate this work to the HIGH PRIORITY ranking, and Be it FURTHER RESOVLED that all necessary funding for effective monitoring be made available on a priority basis and all data from semi-annual reports be made available to the public. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 11 1998 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| No Dry Casks Should Be Permitted on the Great Lakes |
Be It Resolved, that no more dry casks should be permitted to be loaded on the shores of the Great Lakes and that cost effective alternatives to the continued generation of nuclear waste be implemented with all due speed. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 7 1998 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Power in Ontario |
THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVEil, that Great Lakes United's individual members and organizations, demand that the Government of Ontario immedidely institute an electricity eficiency programme aimed at reducing the ratio of electricity used per dollar Gross Provincial Product (GPP) by half; and immediately place an indefinite moratorium on the approval, planning or construciion of new nuclear power stations in the Province. |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1989 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Power Stations |
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the taskforce publish regular reports on its findings so as to gain a better understanding of the potential threat of radionuclide contamination on fish, wildlife and aquatic populations and on drinking water supplies taken from the Great Lakes and its impacts on aquatic, wildlife and human health. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1994 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Regulations |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will encourage citizens' groups to compile, analyze and disseminate data cn radiological effluents of gaseous,liquid and solid wastes from nuclear reactors, nuclear weapcns facilities, uranium mines, millings and nuclear waste sites. These data should be obtained with independent verification; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United will dedicate staff and organizational resources to more aggressive grass roots education projects on nuclear issues, encourage board members in every state and province to attend appropriate public forums to state Great Lakes United's position on these issues and report on all activities in next year's annual report. |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1989 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Waste |
THEREFORE B6 IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United urge the U.S. Department of Energy and Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. that any potential sites for nuclear waste repositories in the Qreat Lakes/St. Lawrence watershed be immediately disqualified from any further consideration for such use, and furthermore, future plans for nuclear waste repositories must consider the magnitude and ecologic seneitivity of the hydrological features of the location being reviewed. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Nuclear Waste Transport in the Great Lakes Basin |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakee United actively promote new federal, state, provincial and local regulations to suspend the transportation of high level nuclear waste within the Great Lakes Basin until such a time that the above concerns are fully addressed and the safe transport of the fuel can be assured. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |