Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization | Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asian Carps at the gateway of the Great Lakes at Chicago |
A power point presentation prepared by Mary Muter for the "What to do about Asian Carp in Canada?" webinar. |
Sierra Club | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) | |
| Victory! Great Lakes- St. Lawrence River Navigation Study takes a 180! |
Presentation material from the Navigation webinar that took place on August 2, 2011 at 12:00pm EDT. |
Save the River | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) | |
| The Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway System:Transportation Cost Savings from Ocean Shipping in the Lakes | Seidman College of Business | Jun 16 2007 | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) | |
| Opportunities for Ecological Design | Orb Analysis for Design | Jan 1 2008 | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) | |
| Good Green Jobs Conference 2012 |
The London District and Labour Council hosts the Good Green Jobs Conference 2012. More information in the attached .pdf file. |
London and District Labour Council | Apr 3 2012 | Multimedia (image, video, audio, PowerPoint) |
| A way forward: Strengthening decision-making and accountability under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
This report focuses on the role and actions of the federal governments (with a particular emphasis on the Canadian government), the Binational Executive Committee, and the International Joint Commission. The report is viewed principally through the lens of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, an historic pollution prevention document signed by Canada and the United States. The authors call for the two governments to reinvigorate leadership on clean-up and protection through the present review and possible renegotiation of the Agreement, and to fully involve the public throughout this process. |
Great Lakes United | Jan 14 2008 | Report |
| Great Lakes Health Effects (1 of 3) |
Health Canada's Great Lakes Health Effects Program prepared an analysis of health statistics for each of the Canadian AOCs that "may be linked to exposure to environmental contaminants." While not directly making a cause and effect link, each report stated what kinds of chemicals are known to result in particular health problems. The Health Canada reports were printed and ready for release by November 1998. The government, however, withheld them and they weren't released until almost a year later in October 1999. This was only because the government was forced to after community activists gained access to them and gave them to a news reporter. The Health Canada release was brief and they were quickly removed from the web and buried again. Shortly thereafter, Health Canada closed down its ground-breaking Great Lakes Health Effects Program. This document compiles reports for the following Areas of Concern: Jackfish Bay, Nipigon Bay, Peninsula Harbour, St. Marys River, and Thunder Bay. |
Health Canada | Oct 1 1999 | Report |
| Great Lakes Health Effects (2 of 3) |
Health Canada's Great Lakes Health Effects Program prepared an analysis of health statistics for each of the Canadian AOCs that "may be linked to exposure to environmental contaminants." While not directly making a cause and effect link, each report stated what kinds of chemicals are known to result in particular health problems. The Health Canada reports were printed and ready for release by November 1998. The government, however, withheld them and they weren't released until almost a year later in October 1999. This was only because the government was forced to after community activists gained access to them and gave them to a news reporter. The Health Canada release was brief and they were quickly removed from the web and buried again. Shortly thereafter, Health Canada closed down its ground-breaking Great Lakes Health Effects Program. This document compiles reports for: Collingwood Harbour, Detroit River, Severn Sound, Spanish Harbour, St. Clair River and Wheatley Harbour. |
Health Canada | Oct 1 1999 | Report |
| Great Lakes Health Effects (3 of 3) |
Health Canada's Great Lakes Health Effects Program prepared an analysis of health statistics for each of the Canadian AOCs that "may be linked to exposure to environmental contaminants." While not directly making a cause and effect link, each report stated what kinds of chemicals are known to result in particular health problems. The Health Canada reports were printed and ready for release by November 1998. The government, however, withheld them and they weren't released until almost a year later in October 1999. This was only because the government was forced to after community activists gained access to them and gave them to a news reporter. The Health Canada release was brief and they were quickly removed from the web and buried again. Shortly thereafter, Health Canada closed down its ground-breaking Great Lakes Health Effects Program. This document compiles reports for: Bay of Quinte, Hamilton Harbour, Metro Toronto, Niagara River, Port Hope Harbour, St. Lawrence River. |
Health Canada | Oct 1 1999 | Report |
| The Pollution of Pisces: Fish Advisories and Chemical Contaminants in the Great Lakes States |
Fish advisories are warnings to the public from state health departments and federal agencies that eating certain fish poses a danger to health because of chemical contamination. They provide graphic public testimony to the risks chemical contamination poses to local and regional ecosystems. The Great Lakes region of the United States contains a disproportionate share of the nations fish advisories. While the states bordering the Great Lakes account for 27 percent of the nations people, they are home to 75 percent of the nations fish advisories and 72 percent of all of the nations fish advisories due to POPs contamination. Fully 100 percent of the Great Lakes waters and their connecting waters are under advisories. |
Clean Water Fund; Ecology Center; Great Lake United; Lake Michigan Federation; Michigan Environmental Council; Sierrra Club Great Lakes Office | Nov 16 2000 | Report |
| Toxics in Vehicles: Mercury |
The United States had a record 210 million automobiles on the road in 1999, up 15 million from 1994, and the total for all of North America in 1996 was more than 235 million. Each year, some 12 million of these vehicles are retired from useful life. Many of the materials used in their production create problems along the way, either in the vehicleÕs manufacture, use or end-of-life. This report examines the historic and continuing use of the highly toxic metal mercury in automobiles and estimates its releases to the environment from end-of-life vehicle (ELV) processing. The report will show that emissions from vehicle recycling and disposal processes are one of the largest sources of mercury contamination to the environment. The report also examines strategies for cleaner production and proposes key policy solutions to eliminate mercury hazards from both new and existing vehicles. |
Ecology Center; Great Lakes United; University of Texas Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies | Jan 21 2001 | Report |
| Practical Problems with POPs Exemptions How U.S.-Proposed General Exemptions Undermine the International POPs Treaty |
The United States government has proposed that a number of general exemptions be included in the international treaty on persistent organic pollutants (POPs). This document explains how these exemptions will undermine the treaty. |
Great Lakes United; Pesticide Action Network | Nov 17 2000 | Report |
| United Nations POPs negotiations and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
This report is to provide the United States delegates to the POPs treaty negotiations with an overview of relevant legal and policy issues that emerge from the Great Lakes experience and agreements, where work on POPs elimination has been underway for over two decades. Of particular concern in the current round of negotiations are a broad set of exemptions advanced by the US delegation which would be severe loopholes to the proposed treaty. This report evaluates relevant lessons learned in the Great Lakes and consistency issues between what has been done in the Great Lakes and the pending global POPs treaty. The report demonstrates that: 1) The "virtual elimination"; and "zero discharge" goals adopted in the Great Lakes region are necessary and practical policies to include in any POPs treaty. 2) The POPs treaty should include the precautionary principle. 3) The US-proposed exemptions are inconsistent with the policies adopted and lessons learned in the Great Lakes region. |
Great Lakes United | Nov 3 2008 | Report |
| Ocean Shipping In the Great Lakes - Phase I |
The principal conclusion of this study is that a cessation of ocean shipping on the Great Lakes would result in a transportation cost penalty of US$54.9 million per year. The study has been peer reviewed by a panel of four peer reviewers from the agricultural economics and economics professions who concluded that the study methodology and conclusions are reasonable. The relatively small transportation cost penalty of US$54.9 million is due to the fact that just 12.3 million metric tons of ocean vessel cargo passed into and out of the Lakes via the MLO Section of the St. Lawrence Seaway in 2002, or some 6.8% of total Great Lakes -St. Lawrence Seaway System tonnage. |
Grand Valley State University; JL Roach Inc. | Dec 6 2005 | Report |
| Ocean Shipping In the Great Lakes - Phase II |
In 2005, a report entitled "Ocean Shipping in the Great Lakes: Transportation Cost Increases That Would Result from a Cessation of Ocean Vessels Shipping" was published. This research activity was funded by The Joyce Foundation and looked at transportation cost increases that would occur if, for whatever reason, ocean shipping ceased in the Great Lakes. The research concluded that shippers would incur additional costs of $55 million annually if this should occur. This is a relatively small amount compared to overall transportation costs associated with the movement of ocean vessel cargo into and out of the Great Lakes region. These cost advantages must be weighed against the costs associated with ocean vessel shipping, especially the cost of invasive species introduction and management. In fact, the research was originally prompted by a number of initiatives related to invasive species and their control through better methods of ballast management. |
Grand Valley State University; JL Roach Inc. | Oct 1 2007 | Report |
| The Future of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: The ENGO Perspective |
In response to the Binational Executive Committee’s (BEC) invitation to comment on their draft review of the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA), the sixty-four groups who submit this brief congratulate the members of the binational Agreement Review Committee (ARC) for pulling together a summary that we believe fairly reflects the discussions carried out during 2006. Therefore, in this brief, instead of focusing on the ARC document, we present our preliminary position on revision of the Agreement. As the review and possible renegotiation continues over the next couple of years, we will present more details on these policy directions. |
Great Lakes United, et al | Jul 14 2007 | Report |
| An action plan on invasive species |
This report outlines five areas in which the Obama administration and 111th Congress can take action to stop invasive species in the United States. It includes: screening intentional imports; preventing inadvertent introductions; funding early detection and response; federal leadership; addressing other funding gaps. |
National Environmental Coalition on Invasive Species | Jan 13 2009 | Report |
| A Better Seaway: Seven Principles to Guide Sustainable Shipping on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River |
Since the Seaway opened on June 26th,1959, the environmental and economic damage brought on by opening the Great Lakes to international ships has been significant. These principles address a broad range of environmental impacts including: invasive species, climate change, Seaway expansion, air emissions, ship-borne pollution, ice-breaking, and governance issues. While international vessels have been a focal point for many of the environmental impacts associated with shipping on the Great Lakes, particularly invasive species, the principles also address domestic operations. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 25 2009 | Report |
| H2Ontario: A Blueprint for a Comprehensive Water Conservation Strategy |
The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement, signed by Ontario with nine other Great Lakes jurisdictions, requires each state and province in the basin to establish water conservation goals, objectives and programs. Implementation of the recommended actions in this report would position Ontario as a regional leader on conservation. |
POLIS Water Sustainability Project | Aug 13 2009 | Report |
| Great Lakes Communications Research |
The primary goal of this research is to support effective public engagement and communications on the protection and restoration of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River ecosystems. The specific objectives are first, to identify public attitudes and values toward the Great Lakes; second, to understand the stories, images and messages that are most likely to lead people to action; and third, to identify key audience segments for messaging, and how best to reach them. |
Great Lakes United; Biodiversity Project | Oct 1 2007 | Report |
| The Fate of the Great Lakes: Sustaining or Draining the Sweetwater Seas? |
This report explores the history of water use and diversion in the Great Lakes, the policy framework that directs action, and the threats facing the Great Lakes from irresponsible water use. It provides recommendations to better conserve and protect the Great Lakes. |
Canadian Environmental Law Association; Great Lakes United | Feb 10 1997 | Report |
| Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement |
The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, amended in 1987. |
International Joint Commission | Report | |
| The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: Challenges to Meet, Promises to Keep |
In 2005 and 2006 the Alliance for the Great Lakes convened a dialog among leading Great Lakes nongovernmental policy groups (NGOs) in the Great Lakes region to identify key issues and recommendations for the current review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (Agreement), a pact the environmental NGOs have cared passionately about for decades. This report is a result of that process. |
Multiple | Report | |
| Annual Report 2009 |
Great Lakes United's Annual Report for 2009. |
Great Lakes United | Nov 20 2010 | Report |
| Solutions to the Asian Carp Crisis |
A backgrounder on the Asian carp. |
Great Lakes United | Report |