Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.
If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.
| Title | Description | Organization | Date published |
Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creation of Two-headed River National Park |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Great Lakes United supports the establishment of the Two-Hearted River National Park if control of hunting, fishing, trapping, and related activities remains with the State of Michigan. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Energy Development and Distribution |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 2. A policy of industrial cogeneration be implenented in industrial planning to allow multiple uses of energy sources for greatest efficiency; and 3. Pricing structures be reformed so as to reward conservation vation in energy use, rather than penalize restraint of uee; and 4. Research seek an optimum combination of energy resources for ecosystem protection, not just coat efficiency; and 5. We accelerate the decommissioning of problematic nuclear facilities; and 6. We pursue planning for maximizing local consumption'of locally generated energy to minimize the proliferation of land use for distribution corridors and terminate leases on abandoned corridors; and 7. Finally, we sustain public education programs directed toward approval and support of the above. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Great Lakes Water Levels Flows and Diversions II |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition the government of Ontario to reverse its decision not to designate this project and to formally designate this project under the Environmental Assessment Act or to establish a commission under Public Inquiries Act to suspend approvals process and to report within 60 days. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United work with the Friends of the Magpie River to ensure these environmental concerns are addressed and no increased diversion are permitted into the Great Lakes Basin. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1987 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Kenosha Diversion |
THEREFORE, Great Lakes United demands a formal investigation of the Kenosha diversion by the Wisconsin Justice Department, Wisconsin State Legislature. the Council of Great Lakes Governors and the Michigan Attorney General, to determine how it could occur, what state laws were also broken, how to enforce the cessation of the diversion, and any penalties that may be appropriate. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Levels and Flows I |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TEAT, Great Lakes United undertake a comprehensive collation of data and information on the proposed structural and land use options and review the risks of each so that we may better evaluate our future ections. Where there is a lack of information |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Level and Flows II |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United reaffirm support for detailed aaseaament of current water use so ae to better approach defense of Great Lakes United opposition to diveraions and further to affirm Great Lakes United's goal af developing a legal defense against diversion;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United seek the means to fund the necessary legal research and intervention. |
Great Lakes United | May 18 1986 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Levels Flows and Diversions |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, Great Lakes United requests that the Governments of the United States and Canada send a reference to the International Joint Commission requesting them to monitor consumptive use of Great Lakes water and study possible control measures (along with THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, such a study include no commitment to future diversion of Great Lakes waters out of the area Lakes Basin. |
Great Lakes United | May 7 1983 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Michigan Mud Creek Irrigation Proposal |
Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the governor of Michigan, the Michigan Natural Resources Commission, and the Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Management Committee to reject this precedent-setting proposal and to implement a water resources conservation plan that documents all withdrawal and consumption of Great Lakes water and groundwater resources. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1993 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Ohio River Canal Study Proposal in Congress |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes B.R. 1519 or any such legislation to fund the atudy of a Lake Erie-Ohio River Canal Project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is inappropriate to fund studies on far-reaching projecta inconsistent with the Great Lakes Charter when other federal qualitative and quantitative research prograre for the Greet Lakes Basin are being crippled in the Halls of Congrees. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Permanent Diversion of Water Out of Great Lakes Basin at Lowell Indiana |
BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United urges the Great Lakes governors to withhold approval of Lowell's water diversion proposal; AND BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED THAT, alternatives should be publicly examined in more detail, including the alternative for the state to commit to supporting construction of a pipeline to re-divert the water back into Lake Michigan (as was agreed to in the Wisconsin case) and also water conservation methods that will be used with timetables for implementation of these measures. |
Great Lakes United | May 5 1991 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Implementation of the Great Lakes Charter |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United re-affirms its opposition to any new diversions out of or into the Great Lakes Basin; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on provincial and state governmenta to demonstrate a commitment to implementing the Great Lakes' Charter through
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United calls on its members to bring their elected public officials to account for any proposal they support which could increase chances for inter-basin diversion of Great Lakes waters, and requeat their public officials to define their commitment to implementing the Great Lakes Charter. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Quebec-Canada St. Lawrence River Agreement |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Quebec - Canada Agreement include a section specifying that the St. Lawrence River clean up effort must have a public participation component similar to the ones In C.O.A. and the GLWQA. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Use of Ontario Fishing License Revenues |
Therefore be it resolved that the Province of Ontario keep its original promise to use this revenue, as they had originally stated they would, for enhancement of remediation and fish stocking. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1993 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Introduction of Exotic Species Through Ship Ballast |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports the development and implementation of research and regulation to stop the introduction of exotic species into the Great Lakes Basin by ships ballast waters. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Navigation I |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the members of Great Lakes United are hereby advised to be prepared to communicate to Members of Congress, their concerns relative to winter navigation just prior to the vote; and to remind those Congressmen that signed the letter of opposition of their commitment; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United wishes to extend its appreciation for the outstanding contributions of several public officials who have played key roles in organizing the opposition to this legislation, including Canadian Minister of the Environment Ckarlee Caccia, Canadian-U.S. Ambassador Allan Gotlieb, Michigan Governor James Blanchard, Michigan Congressmen David Bonior, Robert Davis, Dennis Hertel, Harold Sawyer, New York Congressmen Henry Nowak and David O.B. Martin, and Minnesota Congressman James Oberstar. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Navigation II |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, Great Lakes United reaffirm its Navigation Resolution of 1983; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Navigation Task Force undertake the preparation of a poeition paper representing the Great Lakee United view of commercial navigation use of the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence. In the preparation of this poaition paper, the task force will consider the need to place the issue of navigation on the Great Lakes within the wider context of social, economic and environmental factors--the ecosystem approach. Specifically, the task force shall address navigation issues, including:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, with these considerations in mind the task force shall develop a Great Lakes United action strategy for effective protection of the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the task force shall submit its poaition paper and recomrendations to the Great Lakes United Annual Meeting in 1985, with recorrendationa for inmediate action forwarding to the Board of Directors in the interim. |
Great Lakes United | May 13 1984 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Navigation on the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence River Waterway System |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Great Lakes United navigation task force should be broadened and continue its work for the purpose of: (1) investigating the critical issues which have been advanced in the position paper and any others which may arise; and (2) work along with Great Lakes United members in the development and refining of an action strategy for implementation of Great Lakes United resolutions on commercial navigation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United Navigation's Task Force-promote the following recommendations: The establishment of uniform and coordinated regulatory standards and rules governing commercial navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System which takes the unique environmental, 'social, climatic, economic conditions of the Basin into account. Elements to be coneidered in these uniform regulatory initiatives are: 1. limitation of hazardous goods transported on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River System to ice free and good weather conditions; 2. and in some instances, completely banning the transportation of some kinds of hazardous material, such as radiotoxic material; 3. the enactment of provisions which would impart absolute liability for carriers and shippers of hazardous materials; 4 . the application of stringent safety requirements (which would equal thoee most stringent standards now existing in the basin); 5. the mandatory development of proven containment and clean-up provisions and mechanisms 6. the creation of coordinated mechanisms to ensure the proper monitoring and enforcement of the uniform regulations between Canada and the U.S 7. further research ott the ecological and human health effects of various substances and materials and the working toward a more specific and uniform definition of "hazardous" and "dangerous" material. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Proposed Sault St. Marie Lock |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United believes that no justification exists to spend $226.6 million at this time for a new 1300 ft. lock at Sault Ste. Marie. However, if construction of this lock is to proceed despite these objections it should include the following elements not included in the Detroit District's final interim feasibility study. They are: (1) Dredged materials be used to enhance the local environment. |
Great Lakes United | May 19 1985 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Adoption of Proposed Toxic Water Pollution Control Regulations in Wisconsin |
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United urges the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board and the members of the Wisconsin legislature to remedy the deficiencies described above by amending the draft regulations proposed by the WDNR to include the improvements recommended by Great Lakes United and the other groups participating in the Wisconsin Campaign for Clean Water and then to adopt them in final form; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to the Governor of Wisconsin, the Secretary of the WDNR, members of the appropriate committees of the Wisconsin legislature, and all seven members of the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Winter Navigation |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United reaffirms its long-standing opposition to Winter Navigation; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that our opposition be one of Great Lakes United's highest priorities. |
Great Lakes United | May 8 1988 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Increased Federal Funding of the Great Lakes Research Laboratories |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United petition Congress to Increase the funding for federal Great Lakes research programs because of their losses due to Inflation since 1980; these programs Include, but are not limited to: 1. NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United support the full annual eleven million dollars funding level authorized in Congress to implement the Great Lakes Amendment to the Clean Water Act. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| International Joint Commission Biennial |
Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United repeats its request that the International Joint Commission hold a Saturday workshop on virtual elimination strategy at the upcoming Seventh Biennial meeting, and Be it further resolved that the IJC adjust the program schedule for the RAP forum to Saturday or Sunday to accommodate the RAPIPAC members who cannot attend a weekday meeting. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1993 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| Michigan DNR |
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United opposes the abolishment of the citizen boards and commission. |
Great Lakes United | May 3 1992 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| New York State Environmental Assistance Fund |
Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United supports the concept of funding environmental improvement projects from the recovery of unclaimed beverage container deposits and other sources, and that Great Lakes United supports enactment of New York State's Environmental Assistance Fund to assist municipalities in financing needed environmental projects, preserve and protect open space, enhance public recreational opportunities, and assist Adirondack Park communities in developing and improving land use plans. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1993 | Great Lakes United resolution |
| North American Free Trade Agreement |
Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United reaffirms its commitment to work to oppose the North American Free Trade Agreement. |
Great Lakes United | Jun 6 1993 | Great Lakes United resolution |